Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: karnataka prisons act 1963 section 41 · Page 1 of about 42 results (0.071 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 04 2026

State of Karnataka vs Smt. Pavithra Gowda

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-04-2026

The enactments that are required to be noticed are the Prisons Act, 1894 (‘the 1894 Act’ for short); Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963; Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974; and Karnataka Prisons and Correctional Services Manual, 2021. The issue in the lis revolves … BENGALURU - 560 098. 2 . NAGARAJA R., S/O RACHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, NO.432, A AND B BLOCK, RAMAKRISHNA NAGARA, MYSURU - 570 022. … TO ASSIST THE COURT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023/READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH / SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

State of Kerala vs K.Haridas

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … above margin of ala of nose. connected cases 418. Superficial lacerated wound 0.4 x 0.1 cm on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Girija Menon vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … above margin of ala of nose. connected cases 418. Superficial lacerated wound 0.4 x 0.1 cm on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 12 2020

Ajeesh vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … above margin of ala of nose. connected cases 418. Superficial lacerated wound 0.4 x 0.1 cm on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Jithesh vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … above margin of ala of nose. connected cases 418. Superficial lacerated wound 0.4 x 0.1 cm on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Joseph vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … above margin of ala of nose. connected cases 418. Superficial lacerated wound 0.4 x 0.1 cm on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Suo- Motu, vs Jithesh,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … above margin of ala of nose. connected cases 418. Superficial lacerated wound 0.4 x 0.1 cm on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

P.K.Vimaladevi vs K.Haridas

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … above margin of ala of nose. connected cases 418. Superficial lacerated wound 0.4 x 0.1 cm on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2011

Rohit Shekhar Vs. Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

law laid down in (2010) 7 SCC 263 Selvi vs. State of Karnataka, no sample could be obtained from the defendant no.1 per force without … the matron under the general or special powers of the Medical Officer. As per Section 37 of the Prisons Act, any prisoner wanting to be medically examined or appearing to be sick has to be reported before the … to the Family Reforms Act. In the judgment pronounced on 14th March, 1963 reported at [1963] 2 All E.R. 386, W. v. W. The question … which such refusal might have on the credibility of that party. It is important to note that under Section 41(1) of this Statute, a child born as a result of artificial fertilisation or surrogacy or the guardian of:

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2017

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-15-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

the constitutional and statutory backdrop.33. In J.Jayalalithaa & Ors v. State of Karnataka & Ors.[8]., the Court held that fair trial is the main object … General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by … to the specific performance of the agreement. The relief was claimed under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 but not under Section 21 of that Act. The High Court came to the conclusion that Section 28 … were recovered from the house of the third respondent and FIR Nos. 41 to 44 of 2005 were registered. In November, 2005 he was arrested

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial