Advanced Search Results

State of Karnataka Vs. Abdul Kareem Telgi @ Kareem Lala

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

22 of the Karnataka Prison Manual, 1978, reads “22. Under section 4 read with Section 10 of the Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963 (Karnataka thus:75. Act of 33 of 1963) there shall be for every Prison a Superintendent who shall manage … of Cr.P.C., challenging the acquittal of respondents/ accused Nos.1, 2, 3, 5 to 11, 18 , 26, 31, 32 and 33 in S.C.Nos.643 of 2003, 352 of 2004 and 353 of 2004, dated 14.9.2010, on the file

Hajaresab Vs. Udachappa Deceased by L.Rs.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 50

Reported in : ILR1984KAR900

Matched in: Court Karnataka

Y. Dass and anr. Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 302, 324(34), 326 and 433A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 20(2) and 226; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23(1) and 23-D; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1978

Reported in : 1990CriLJ234; ILR1989KAR3409; 1989(3)KarLJ595

Matched in: Court Karnataka

Navtej Singh Johar Vs. Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice Secr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

occasions, the other concomitant rights are affected. 15(2013) 2 SCC39816(2013) 10 SCC59129 32. The petitioners have advanced their argument that Section 377 IPC impedes the … to citizens. It did not apply only to 'white' people. It did not apply only to good people. Prisoners, murderers and even traitors were to be entitled to the freedoms that were declared. There were no exceptions … in Suresh Koushal (supra) had been guided by social morality leaning on majoritarian perception whereas the issue, in actuality, needed to be debated upon in the backdrop of constitutional morality. A contention was also advanced that the … 31-44 Decisions in Naz Foundation and Suresh Koushal………………..…………………………….. Other judicial pronouncements on Section 377 IPC ……………………….………………………….. The Constitution - an organic charter of progressive rights…………………………………

Siddappa S/o Rajendra Bhanji Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF MARCH, 2020 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT W.P.No.204884/2015 (LA-KIADB) Between: … State Government shall pay for such acquisition compensation in accordance with the prisons of this Act. (2) Where the amount of compensation has been determined … latches which a litigant approaches the writ Court with, the limitation period prescribed by the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 has to be kept in view; such a course would do justice to both the sides, by balancing … in lieu of employment; such an arrangement falls within the scope of section 29 (1) & (2) of the 1966 Act; it is profitable to

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(8) SCC534; Bhanumati v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2010) 12 SCC1; K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka, (2011) 9 SCC1; State of Madhya Pradesh v. Rakesh Kohli, (2012) 6 SCC312; Namit Sharma v. Union of … Maneka, the Supreme Court considered a challenge to the provisions for solitary confinement under Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 which stipulated that a prisoner “under sentence of death” is to be kept in a cell apart … India”, Economic & Political Weekly (2015), Vol. 50 Issue 22, at page 32 320 Ibid, at page 34 321 Bert-Jaap Koops et al., “A Typology

Rohit Shekhar Vs. Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

law laid down in (2010) 7 SCC 263 Selvi vs. State of Karnataka, no sample could be obtained from the defendant no.1 per force without … the matron under the general or special powers of the Medical Officer. As per Section 37 of the Prisons Act, any prisoner wanting to be medically examined or appearing to be sick has to be reported before the … to the Family Reforms Act. In the judgment pronounced on 14th March, 1963 reported at [1963] 2 All E.R. 386, W. v. W. The question … suffering from venereal diseases. We may also notice that Section 2 of Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939, Section 32 of Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, Section 10 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869, Section 13 of Hindu

High Court of Karnataka, Rep. by the Registrar General, Bangalore Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

after the completion of the parole period and he has no objection for issuing appropriate directions. 5. The Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963 (in short, 'the Prisons Act') and the Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974 (in short, 'the Prisons Rules), governs the … (Prayer: This criminal petition is filed under Sections 482 and 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to issue appropriate directions to the respondents and

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs. Yuvraj and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

720 Gupta @ Sethi Gupta V/s. State of Bihar (2013) 12 SCC 383), (2) Venkatesha V/s. State of Karnataka, (3) Sudevanand V/s. State through CBI (2012 AIR (SCW) 953), (4) Bangaru Laxman V/s. State [Through CBI] and … (P.W.1) was original accused no.3, who was arrested on 16th March, 2012 and he was lodged in District Prison, Jalgaon. As per the prosecution case, on 21st June, 2012, the Approver wrote a letter to the Superintendent, … on 21/06/2012 (Ex.52) mentioning therein that, he was repenting of his sinful act and desirous to disclose entire incident. He requested Investigating Officer to produce … said case, have been therefore forwarded to this Court for confirmation under section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The accused no.1-Yuvraj Kashinath Sabale and … one gold Pendant and gold Ear-rings (Karnafule) total 32.250 gms. Recovery panchanama was accordingly drawn by Investigating

Sushil Arora vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Gopal Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, (2010) 6 SCC407 Shivasharanappa and Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka, AIR2013SCC2144 Lahu Kamlakar Patil and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2013 (1) Crimes 386 SC; Joseph @ Jose … the appellants, viz Sonveer @ Pinku (Crl. Appeal no.283/2016) was acquitted of the charge under Section 27 Arms Act 1959, which had been additionally framed against him and against another appellant Vishnu (Crl. Appeal no.1338/2015), on the … in judicial custody in another case relating to FIR No.47/2007 under Sections 324, 506 & 34 IPC PS Prashad Nagar.6. After the arrests of the