Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: karnataka prisons act 1963 section 28 · Page 1 of about 63 results (0.061 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 04 2026

State of Karnataka vs Smt. Pavithra Gowda

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-04-2026

The enactments that are required to be noticed are the Prisons Act, 1894 (‘the 1894 Act’ for short); Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963; Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974; and Karnataka Prisons and Correctional Services Manual, 2021. The issue in the lis revolves … to be given besan flour 60 grams jaggery 60 grams and oil 28 grams. … … … Scale No.III Scale of Diet for C class … TO ASSIST THE COURT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023/READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH / SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2025

Deepa Angadi W/O Siddapa Ctp 0898 vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Aug-22-2025

remitting the sentence.4. Learned AGA on instructions would submit that:4.1. remission under Section 63 (2) (e) of the Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963, is not a matter of right, and it is left to the total discretion of the Respondent authorities … 4 months and 12 days; Siddappa has undergone incarceration for total period of 18 years 2 months and 28 days and Mallavva has undergone incarceration of 15 years 6 months 13 days as on 1.4.2023. -4-3.3. An

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 1990

Karnataka Board of Wakfs Vs. Joharmal Jawanji

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-02-1990

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 - Sections 70; Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 5(2), 25 and 28; Public Wakfs (Extension of Limitation) Act, 1959 - Sections 2

Reported in : ILR1990KAR679; 1990(1)KarLJ270

unidentifiable with the notified property, the plaintiff cannot take advantage of the Notification dated 11th April 1983. - KARNATAKA PRISONS ACT, 1963 [K.A. No. 33/1963]. Karnataka Prisons Manual, Article 650: [S.R. Bannurmath & K. Ramanna, JJ] Parole - Question whether … 1954 (Central Act 29 of 1954) or registered under Section 25 or 28 of the said Wakf Act, filed by the Karnataka Board of Wakfs, … fee of Rs. 15/-purporting to do so under Notification No. HD 19 CCF 61 dated 10-8-1961 issued under Section 70 of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. Defendants contended that the said Notification is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 22 2026

Sri Chan Pasha a. vs National Investigation Agency

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-22-2026

Matched in: Court Karnataka

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

State of Kerala vs K.Haridas

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … were properly packed and sealed. MOs 2 to 28 recovered as per Ext.P23 inquest report are identified

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Girija Menon vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … were properly packed and sealed. MOs 2 to 28 recovered as per Ext.P23 inquest report are identified

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Ajeesh vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … were properly packed and sealed. MOs 2 to 28 recovered as per Ext.P23 inquest report are identified

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Jithesh vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … were properly packed and sealed. MOs 2 to 28 recovered as per Ext.P23 inquest report are identified

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Joseph vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … were properly packed and sealed. MOs 2 to 28 recovered as per Ext.P23 inquest report are identified

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Suo- Motu, vs Jithesh,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … were properly packed and sealed. MOs 2 to 28 recovered as per Ext.P23 inquest report are identified

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial