Advanced Search Results
State of Karnataka vs Smt. Pavithra Gowda
Karnataka
Mar-04-2026
The enactments that are required to be noticed are the Prisons Act, 1894 (‘the 1894 Act’ for short); Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963; Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974; and Karnataka Prisons and Correctional Services Manual, 2021. The issue in the lis revolves … TO ASSIST THE COURT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023/READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH / SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED … 1 . SMT. PAVITHRA GOWDA D/O. PUTTANNA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, NO.808, 24TH CROSS, KENCHENAHALLI ROAD, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 098. 2 . NAGARAJA
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. P. Jayaraj Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Apr-25-1985
Constitution
Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963; Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974; Criminal Procedure code - Sections 428; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
ILR1986KAR1460
the Advisory Board for the District Prison, Mysore, will hereinafter be referred to as the 'Advisory Board'. The Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963 ; The Karnataka Prison Rules, 1974 ; and the Karnataka Prison Manual, 1978, will be referred to in … to surrender to the jail authorities of the District Prison, Mysore within 24 hours from the time of the service of the order. During the … prematurely.2. 1) The petitioner along with four other accused was convicted on 18-8-1978 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 148, 307 read with Section 149; and Section 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeepa Angadi W/O Siddapa Ctp 0898 vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka Dharwad
Aug-22-2025
remitting the sentence.4. Learned AGA on instructions would submit that:4.1. remission under Section 63 (2) (e) of the Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963, is not a matter of right, and it is left to the total discretion of the Respondent authorities … the Hon9ble Apex Court in the case of Asfaq vs. State of Rajasthan and others1 more particularly Para 24 thereof which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:24. Applying these principles in the case at hand, on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
High Court of Karnataka, Rep. by the Registrar General, Bangalore Vs. ...
Karnataka
Apr-09-2014
Education
after the completion of the parole period and he has no objection for issuing appropriate directions. 5. The Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963 (in short, 'the Prisons Act') and the Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974 (in short, 'the Prisons Rules), governs the … to surrender before the prison on the scheduled date and time, within 24 hours to the jurisdictional police station of his failure; that the National … (Prayer: This criminal petition is filed under Sections 482 and 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to issue appropriate directions to the respondents and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Bureau of Investigation, Bangalore Vs. Kenche Mahesh Kumar
Karnataka
Jul-21-2015
Criminal
Matched in: Court Karnataka
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala vs K.Haridas
Kerala
Aug-12-2020
S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … on the defence side and also after considering 244 documents exhibited for the prosecution, 25 documents for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirija Menon vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Aug-12-2020
S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … on the defence side and also after considering 244 documents exhibited for the prosecution, 25 documents for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjeesh vs the State of Kerala
Kerala
Aug-12-2020
S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … on the defence side and also after considering 244 documents exhibited for the prosecution, 25 documents for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJithesh vs the State of Kerala
Kerala
Aug-12-2020
S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … on the defence side and also after considering 244 documents exhibited for the prosecution, 25 documents for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoseph vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Aug-12-2020
S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … on the defence side and also after considering 244 documents exhibited for the prosecution, 25 documents for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »