Advanced Search Results

Vidya Nand Jha @ Bidya Nand Jha, Son of Prayag NaraIn Jha and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13, 13(1) and 13(2); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years under Section 120B read with 420 of the Indian Penal Code, rigorous imprisonment for two years under Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code and rigorous imprisonment … for two years under Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code and rigorous imprisonment for two years under Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code.2. Vidyanand Jha, appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 391 of 2001 has been sentenced

Kalidas Biswas Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 419, 420, 466, 467 and 468

Reported in : (2004)2CALLT389(HC)

started on the basis of FIR lodged by Balai Chandra Biswas since deceased under Sections 419/420/466/467/468/34 of the Indian Penal Code raising allegations that one of his sons Kalidas Biswas presently thepetitioner in collusion with other accused … Kanti Ghosh. The learned trial Court framed charges under Section 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 468/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the present petitioner and other two accused persons. The learned trial Court

Mal Singh Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227, 397 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 227; India Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406, 420, 468 and 471; Arms Act - Sections 25, 54 and 59

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)710; 98(2002)DLT163; 2002(63)DRJ17

a direction to reconsider the whole case and re-frame the charges in case FIR No.571/93 under Sections 420/468/471, IPC, P.S. Hauz Khas.2. In brief, prosecution allegations are that complainant was running a business of selling of sweets … S.K. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has

State of Maharashtra Vs. Madhukar Wamanrao Smarth

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 31(1), 248 and 389; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 109 and 420

Reported in : AIR2008SC1793; 2008CriLJ2591; JT2008(4)SC461; 2008(4)SCALE412; (2008)5SCC721; 2008AIRSCW2475; 2008(2)AICLR743; 2008(3)LH(SC)1857

theJudgmentConviction under sectionImprisonmentState of Maharashtra v. SunilMishraRegular Criminal Case No.372/0210.1.200722.2.0743 daysNo information(A) Under Section 420 r/wSection 34, 109 IPC Section 248(ii) Cr.P.C.(A) Rl for 6 years And fine ofRs. 20000/- and in default to suffer Rl for 3 … for 6 years And fine ofRs. 20000/- and in default to suffer Rl for 3 months (B) Under Section 468 r/wSection 34 IPC + Section 248(ii) Cr P.C.(B) Rl for 5 years And fine ofRs. 15,000/- in Default

Devender Singh Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Companies Act - Sections 394 and 394(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 320, 357, 397, 482 and 561A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 47, 120B, 147, 148, 279, 307, 379, 406, 409, 418, 419, 420, 427, 452, 463, 464, 465, 467, 468, 471, 472, 474, 498A and 506; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2008(106)DRJ139

their disputes. 7.3 The non-compoundable offences involved in the present case include Section 468 and 471 of the IPC. Section 468 prescribes punishment for the offence of forgery of a document for the purpose of cheating defined under Section … para 21: 'at best, the only offence that can be allegedly made out is one punishable under Section 420 IPC which is a compoundable offence and the Bank is ready and willing to compound the same and

Manish Madan and Anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

taken by the applicant learned trial court further proceeded towards framing charges for the offence under Sections 419/468/471 IPC read with Section 120B IPC and Sections 420/511 IPC read with Section 120B IPC vide order dated 05.05.2014.

Manish Madan and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

taken by the applicant learned trial court further proceeded towards framing charges for the offence under Sections 419/468/471 IPC read with Section 120B IPC and Sections 420/511 IPC read with Section 120B IPC vide order dated 05.05.2014.

Manish Madan and Anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

taken by the applicant learned trial court further proceeded towards framing charges for the offence under Sections 419/468/471 IPC read with Section 120B IPC and Sections 420/511 IPC read with Section 120B IPC vide order dated 05.05.2014.

Washeshar Nath Chadha Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 409; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2)

Reported in : 48(1992)DLT140; 1992(1)DRJ24

which included commission. This amounts to commission of offence under sections 463, 464, 468 and 420 of the IPC. Forgery is committed in preparing documents dishonestly and fraudulently regarding the termination of agreement of commission by resorting … Sat Pal, J.(1) This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') is directed against First Information. Report

Pawan Kumar JaIn Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) - Section 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34, 465; Companies Act, 1956; Transfer of Property Act, 1982 - Section 52

therefore, a prima facie offence under Section 471 IPC is also disclosed against the petitioner. The offence under Section 468 IPC is however not made out because admittedly, the General Power of Attorney was executed and got registered … & Anr," whereby the petitioner and his co-accused were summoned to face trial for the offences under Section 420/467/468/471/34 IPC in the complaint filed by respondent No.2.2. Briefly stated, facts relevant for the disposal of this petition