Advanced Search Results

Ramdayal Yadav and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 302, 380 and 448

Reported in : [2004(1)JCR302(Jhr)]

in S.T.No. 38/88, whereby and whereunder, all the appellants have been convicted under Section 302/149, 448 and 380 IPC and sentencing each of them to undergo imprisonment for life under Section 302/149 IPC. However, no separate sentence

Ramakrishna, Mandya Vs. the Secretary, Home Dept. Bangalore and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227, 72, 161, 142(1), 145, 367(1), 74, 20(1), 72/161, 21, 74(1), 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 448, 302, 143, 144, 148, 301, 57; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 235(1), 401(5), 402, 432, 433, 433A, 435, 401, 432(3); uttar pradesh Prisoners’ Release on Probation Act, 1938; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(8)(b), 3(60)(b), 14, 21

the murder of Honnegouda by entering into the farm house and thereby he has committed offence punishable under Section 448 and 302 of IPC. Prosecution has failed to prove the charges levelled against accused-2 to 9 for offence

Vijai and Another Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chennai

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

302 r/w 34 of IPC. The trial court, by judgement dated 29.10.2014, convicted both A1 and A2 under Section 448 r/w 34 of IPC instead of under Section 449 r/w 34 of IPC and under Section 302 r/w

Md. Ankoos and ors. Vs. the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 145; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 120B, 148, 149, 302, 307 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145, 161, 161(3), 162, 172, 172(2), 172(3), 378 and 386

Reported in : AIR2010SC566; 2009(57)BLJR2852; JT2009(14)SC6; 2010(I)OLR(SC)556; 2009(13)SCALE584; (2010)1SCC94; 2009(10)LC4781(SC)

in the village. 77 persons were sent up for trial for the offences under Sections 148, 448, 307, 302, 120B read with 109, IPC. The Court of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge at Warangal vide his judgment dated … D. 1 to D.5 with intent to kill them and that you thereby committed an offence punishable Under Section 448 IPC and within the cognizance of this Court. CHARGE No. 3: That you on the above mentioned date,

Anisetti Veerabhadra Rao S/O Ramulu and Vs. the State of Andhra Prades ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 114, 302, 307 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 174, 313 and 391

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD(Cri)645; 2008(3)ALT(Cri)296; 2009CriLJ730

Sessions Judge found A1-Anisetti Veerabhadra Rao and A2-Anisetti Venkata Ramana guilty for the offences under Sections 448 and 302 IPC and convicted them accordingly and sentenced each of them to suffer RI for 6 months for the … convicted them accordingly and sentenced each of them to suffer RI for 6 months for the offence under Section 448 IPC and imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default to suffer SI for

Mallikarjun Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

the sentence of life imprisonment imposed upon each of them. The High Court also affirmed their conviction under Section 448 read with Section 34 IPC and sentence of imprisonment imposed upon each of them.2. The appellants-accused No.1-Mallikarjun, accused … and by which the High Court affirmed the conviction of the appellants-accused Nos.1, 2 and 4 under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and the sentence of life imprisonment imposed upon each of them. The

Namathoti Sankaramma Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 173, 202, 210, 210(1), 210(2) and 210(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 120B, 209, 302, 306, 406, 448, 489 and 506

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD(Cri)588; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)17; 2000CriLJ4831

No. 19 of 1995 was registered at Dakkli police station for offences under Sections 302 and 209 of IPC. After investigation, the charge-sheet was filed by the police for the offences under Sections 448, 306 and 506 … order passed by the learned Sessions Judge dt. 29-5-2000 in Cri. P. No. 178 of 2000 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act under which the application for condoning the delay in presenting criminal revision petition

MoijuddIn and ors. Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34

Sessions Judge, Barpeta, Assam in Sessions Case No. 6/89 convicting the accused appellants under Section 302/34 of the IPC and sentencing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000 each, in … where Malanchabibi and Mongla Mia succumbed to their injuries.5. On receipt of the FIR a case under Section 448/326/307/34 IPC was registered. Malanchabibi died on 16.2.1986 while Mongla Miadied after 6/7 days. Eventually, on conclusion of investigation,

Jai Kamal Sahu Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 447 and 448; Evidence Act, 1872

to suffer, for his conviction under Section 302 IPC, imprisonment for life and undergo, for his conviction under Section 448 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of 2 (two) months, both the sentences having been directed to run

Babu Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 300, 302, 304, 307, 323, 336, 447, 448 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1633

judgment dated May 14, 2001 while acquitting co-accused persons, convicted and sentenced the appellants as under: -Durga Prasad:Under Section 448 IPC:To suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.Under Section 302 IPC:To suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.