Advanced Search Results

Vithalrao Udhaorao Uttarwar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 15, 15(3), 16, 17, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 25, 25(1), (2), (2A), (2B), (3), (4), (5) and (6),29(1), 31, 31(2), 31-A, 31-B, 31-C, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 50, 53(1), 53(2), 132, 133, 226, 277, 245, 246, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 301, 352, 354, 355, 357, 358, 359(1), 359(1-A), 360, 367, 368 and 394; Constitution (Fortieth Amendment) Act; Constitution (Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Act, 1972; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2-A, 2(5), 22(5), 2(9), 2(21), 2(30), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(14), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 4(1), 11, 12, 12(2), 13, 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15, 16, 16(3), 17, 17(1), 18, 21, 21-A(1), 21(4), 23, 27, 28

Reported in : AIR1977Bom99

(Act No. 27 of 1961) as amended by the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) and (Amendment) Act, 1972 (Act No. 21 of 1975) Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) (Amendment) Amendment Act, 1975 (Act … the provisions of Article 14 of' the Constitution. But as Act 40 of 1975, has been placed by Section 5 of the 39th Amendment in the protected 9th Schedule of the Constitution, it becomes immune from such an

Ruckelshaus Vs. Monsanto Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

S. 1021 [ Footnote 1 ] For purposes of our discussion of FIFRA, the term "pesticides" includes herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, rodenticides, and plant regulators. See §§ 2(t) and (u) of FIFRA, as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§ 136(t) … and data-disclosure provisions of FIFRA effected a "taking" of property without just compensation, in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and that the data-consideration provisions violated the Amendment because they effected a taking of property for a private, … consideration or disclosure of data submitted by appellee prior to October 22, 1972, or after September 30, 1978, does not effect a taking, but EPA's … Act claim. Pp. 467 U. S. 1016 -1019. 5. Because the Tucker Act is available as a … THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI Syllabus The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to use data submitted by … compensation may be considered by EPA without limitation. Section 10, as amended in 1978, authorizes, in general,

Parmanand Choudhary and ors. Vs. Smt. Shukla Devi Mishra and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53(2), 283(1), 397, 398 and 485; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 6 and 9

Reported in : [1990]67CompCas45(MP)

assets and liabilities of that business and to carry on that business of manufacturing and selling of pesticides, insecticides and other plant protection chemicals. The other objects of the company are set forth in the memorandum of … on September 17, 1981, by the M. P. Finance Corporation under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, as amended by the Amending Act of 1972 ; the first act of mismanagement alleged was of not holding any … C.P. Sen, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 485 of the Companies Act, 1956, by the appellants/petitioners against rejection of … to Rs. 2,00,000 and each of the four partners' contribution was Rs. 50,000 and the profits and losses were to be shared equally by all

Sansar Chand. Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Section 55; Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 51; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 313

kill the frogs the insects will increase and this will require more insecticides. Use of much insecticide may create health problems. To give another example, … trophies. Chapter VI makes violation of the provisions of the Act a criminal offence. By the Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 the punishment has been increased vide Section 51 as amended, and the property derived from illegal hunting … ecological chain and ecological balance in our environment.4. The appellant herein has been convicted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 by all the three courts below and now he is in appeal before us.5. Before dealing with the

Novartis Ag and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3(d)(b), 2(1)(d), 133, 24(A), 25(1), 2(8)(10), 14, 5, 10; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Section 20(1); Patents and Designs Act, 1911

the Patents Act, 1970, was subjected to large scale changes in three stages; and finally, by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, section 5 was altogether deleted from the Parent Act (Patents Act, 1970). Between January 1, 1995 and … maintenance of public health, or the prevention or control of any epidemic disease among human beings or animals,iv) insecticides, germicides, fungicides, weedicides and all other substances intended to be used for the protection or preservation of plants;v) … the recommendations of the report, and came into force on April 20, 1972, replacing the Patents and Designs Act, 1911.44. Section 1 of the new

M.k. Ranjitsinh Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of no-grazing zones and restricted grazing zones in critical and semi-critical habitats, a prohibition on the use of insecticides and pesticides within a radius of 5 km of critical habitats and a prohibition on the encroachment of … They are: i. The GIB is listed in Part III of Schedule I of the Wild Life (Protection) Act 1972. The species listed in Schedule I are granted the highest level of protection from hunting, in terms of … Act 2010, amongst others. In 2022, the Energy Conservation Act 2001 was amended to empower the Central Government to provide for a carbon credit trading … to climate change and the attendant concerns. 15 Energy Conservation Act 2001, Section 14(w). 17 | P age However, this does not mean that the

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and Others

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Intellectual Property

representations by way of oppositions under section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) with request for hearing under rule 55 of the Patents Rules, … It did not define novelty, inventive step or industrial application. This provision remained in force in India till 1972 when the Patents Act, 1970 was brought into force. The English Courts then developed the doctrine of selection … MEMBER: By this order we dispose of five appeal Nos. TA/1 to 5/2007/PT/CH and miscellaneous petition Nos. 1 to 5/2007 in TA/1 to 5/2007/PT/CH filed

Dr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 26, 27 and 36; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 39, 41 and 42; Clean Air Acts

Reported in : AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)

of a letter by one Dr. Ashok addressed to the Chief Justice of India indicating therein that several insecticides, colour additives, food additives are in widespread use in this country which have already been banned in several … in the legislation itself, and therefore, steps should be taken for appropriate amendment to the legislation. In the net result, therefore, writ petition is disposed … in the United States of America by the Environmental Protection Agency since 1972. Soon thereafter the said insecticide has been banned in several other countries … the Act as well as to carry out the other functions assigned to the Board under the Act. Section 5 stipulates Constitution of a Registration Committee which Committee is empowered to regulate its own procedure for conduct of

Bates Vs. Dow Agrosciences Llc

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

Hursh, Annotation, Liability of Manufacturer or Seller for Injury Caused by Animal Feed or Medicines, Crop Sprays, Fertilizers, Insecticides, Rodenticides, and Similar Products, 81 A. L. R. 2d 138, 144 (1962) (“A duty of due, reasonable care … responsibility for this registration process. In 1972, spurred by growing environmental and safety concerns, Congress adopted the extensive amendments[ Footnote 9 ] that “transformed FIFRA from a labeling law into a comprehensive regulatory statute.” Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto … if it determines that a registered pesticide is misbranded.[ Footnote 11 ] Section 136v, which was added in the 1972 amendments, addresses the States’ continuing … registered pursuant to its authority under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Petitioners gave Dow notice of their intent to sue, claiming that … Court held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U. S. 504 , that the term “requirement”

Thomas Vs. Union Carbide

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

S. 986 (1984). Monsanto examined whether FIFRA's data-consideration provision effects an uncompensated taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment. In this case, we address whether Article III of the Constitution prohibits Congress from selecting binding arbitration with … to correct problems created by the Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act of 1972, 86 Stat. 973 (1972 Act), itself a major revision of prior law. … 568 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Syllabus The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) requires manufacturers of pesticides, as a precondition for registering a pesticide, to submit … application for registration of a similar product by another registrant ("follow-on" registrant). Section 3(c)(1)(D)(ii) of FIFRA authorizes EPA to consider certain previously submitted data only … Thomas v. Union Carbide - 473 U.S. 568 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Thomas v. Union Carbide,