Advanced Search Results

Ruckelshaus Vs. Monsanto Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

S. 1021 [ Footnote 1 ] For purposes of our discussion of FIFRA, the term "pesticides" includes herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, rodenticides, and plant regulators. See §§ 2(t) and (u) of FIFRA, as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§ 136(t) … and data-disclosure provisions of FIFRA effected a "taking" of property without just compensation, in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and that the data-consideration provisions violated the Amendment because they effected a taking of property for a private, … consideration or disclosure of data submitted by appellee prior to October 22, 1972, or after September 30, 1978, does not effect a taking, but EPA's … THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI Syllabus The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to use data submitted by … compensation may be considered by EPA without limitation. Section 10, as amended in 1978, authorizes, in general, … Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co. - 467 U.S. 986 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Ruckelshaus v.

Vithalrao Udhaorao Uttarwar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 15, 15(3), 16, 17, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 25, 25(1), (2), (2A), (2B), (3), (4), (5) and (6),29(1), 31, 31(2), 31-A, 31-B, 31-C, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 50, 53(1), 53(2), 132, 133, 226, 277, 245, 246, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 301, 352, 354, 355, 357, 358, 359(1), 359(1-A), 360, 367, 368 and 394; Constitution (Fortieth Amendment) Act; Constitution (Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Act, 1972; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2-A, 2(5), 22(5), 2(9), 2(21), 2(30), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(14), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 4(1), 11, 12, 12(2), 13, 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15, 16, 16(3), 17, 17(1), 18, 21, 21-A(1), 21(4), 23, 27, 28

Reported in : AIR1977Bom99

(Act No. 27 of 1961) as amended by the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) and (Amendment) Act, 1972 (Act No. 21 of 1975) Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) (Amendment) Amendment Act, 1975 (Act … Kerala : AIR1973SC1461 .22. In this aspect of the matter it is further urged that the provisions of Section 4 of the Act, now amended enacting the concept of 'family unit' and its premises are contrary to the

Parmanand Choudhary and ors. Vs. Smt. Shukla Devi Mishra and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53(2), 283(1), 397, 398 and 485; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 6 and 9

Reported in : [1990]67CompCas45(MP)

assets and liabilities of that business and to carry on that business of manufacturing and selling of pesticides, insecticides and other plant protection chemicals. The other objects of the company are set forth in the memorandum of … on September 17, 1981, by the M. P. Finance Corporation under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, as amended by the Amending Act of 1972 ; the first act of mismanagement alleged was of not holding any … C.P. Sen, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 485 of the Companies Act, 1956, by the appellants/petitioners against rejection of … C.P. Sen, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 485 of the Companies Act, 1956, by the appellants/petitioners against rejection of their

Sansar Chand. Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Section 55; Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 51; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 313

kill the frogs the insects will increase and this will require more insecticides. Use of much insecticide may create health problems. To give another example, … trophies. Chapter VI makes violation of the provisions of the Act a criminal offence. By the Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 the punishment has been increased vide Section 51 as amended, and the property derived from illegal hunting … ecological chain and ecological balance in our environment.4. The appellant herein has been convicted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 by all the three courts below and now he is in appeal before us.5. Before dealing with the

M.k. Ranjitsinh Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of no-grazing zones and restricted grazing zones in critical and semi-critical habitats, a prohibition on the use of insecticides and pesticides within a radius of 5 km of critical habitats and a prohibition on the encroachment of … They are: i. The GIB is listed in Part III of Schedule I of the Wild Life (Protection) Act 1972. The species listed in Schedule I are granted the highest level of protection from hunting, in terms of … of Rajasthan, Forest Department, ‘Project Great Indian Bustard’ 4 IUCN Red List (n 2). 4 | P … Act 2010, amongst others. In 2022, the Energy Conservation Act 2001 was amended to empower the Central Government to provide for a carbon credit trading … to climate change and the attendant concerns. 15 Energy Conservation Act 2001, Section 14(w). 17 | P age However, this does not mean that the

Collr. of Cus. Vs. Indo-swiss Synthetic Gem Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : CustomsLimitation

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 27, 27(2) and 28D; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B and 12B; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995(52)ECC53; 2003(162)ELT121(Mad)

Industry. The product manufactured by the petitioners was also registered by the Insecticides Board, Faridabad, for the manufacture of Copper Oxychloride. The petitioners require as … and D.1106 dated 19-12-1980.10. During the pendency of the above Writ Petitions, the Central Excises and Customs Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991 (Act 40 of 1991 - for short 'Amendment Act'), which was published in the Gazette of India, … by the petitioners for the period September 1, 1970 to February 19, 1972 cannot be legally termed as payment of excise duty authorised by law … under Clause (f) of the first proviso to Sub-section (2), including any such notification approved or modified under Sub-section (4), may be rescinded by the Central Government at any time by notification in the Official Gazette.'(ii) The newly

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and Others

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Intellectual Property

representations by way of oppositions under section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) with request for hearing under rule 55 of the Patents Rules, … It did not define novelty, inventive step or industrial application. This provision remained in force in India till 1972 when the Patents Act, 1970 was brought into force. The English Courts then developed the doctrine of selection … M/s Hetro Drugs Limited, India (hereinafter referred to as R 3, R 4, R 5, R 6 and R 7, respectively) filed representations by way

Dr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 26, 27 and 36; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 39, 41 and 42; Clean Air Acts

Reported in : AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)

the Schedule from time to time; or(iii) any preparation containing any one or more of such substances; 15. Section 4 contemplates Constitution of a Board called Central Insecticides Board whose duty is to advise the Central Government and … human health, this is a lacuna in the legislation itself, and therefore, steps should be taken for appropriate amendment to the legislation. In the net result, therefore, writ petition is disposed of with the observations made earlier … and after consultation with the Registration Committee set up under the Insecticides Act 1968 cancelled the Certificate of Registration in respect ofAaldrin, restricted the use … in the United States of America by the Environmental Protection Agency since 1972. Soon thereafter the said insecticide has been banned in several other countries

Bates Vs. Dow Agrosciences Llc

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

Hursh, Annotation, Liability of Manufacturer or Seller for Injury Caused by Animal Feed or Medicines, Crop Sprays, Fertilizers, Insecticides, Rodenticides, and Similar Products, 81 A. L. R. 2d 138, 144 (1962) (“A duty of due, reasonable care … responsibility for this registration process. In 1972, spurred by growing environmental and safety concerns, Congress adopted the extensive amendments[ Footnote 9 ] that “transformed FIFRA from a labeling law into a comprehensive regulatory statute.” Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto … if it determines that a registered pesticide is misbranded.[ Footnote 11 ] Section 136v, which was added in the 1972 amendments, addresses the States’ continuing … registered pursuant to its authority under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Petitioners gave Dow notice of their intent to sue, claiming that … that §136v(b) pre-empted claims such as petitioners’. Pp. 4-9. 2. FIFRA’s pre-emption provision applies only to state-law

Bharat Pulverising Mills Ltd. Vs. the Joint Director of Agriculture (i ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1992)2MLJ511

ORDERK.S. Bakthavatsalam, J.1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of insecticides. The Agricultural Officer (Quality Control) of the office of the Assistant Director of Agriculture, Papanasam, took a sample … is otherwise deceptive in respect of its contents; orSection 14 of the Act provides for revocation, suspension and amendment of licences. Section 19 of the Act speaks above the appointment of persons as Insecticide Analysts by the … of the writ petition that the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Central Act No. 46 of 1968) is intended to prevent risk to human beings in the