Advanced Search Results

Ruckelshaus Vs. Monsanto Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

S. 1021 [ Footnote 1 ] For purposes of our discussion of FIFRA, the term "pesticides" includes herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, rodenticides, and plant regulators. See §§ 2(t) and (u) of FIFRA, as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§ 136(t) … a "taking" of property without just compensation, in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and that the data-consideration provisions violated the Amendment because they effected a … data submitted by appellee prior to October 22, 1972, or after September 30, 1978, does not effect … THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI Syllabus The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to use data submitted by … not publicly disclose the health and safety information. Brief for Appellant 5, n. 5. [ Footnote 4 ] Section 3(c)(1)(D), 92 Stat. 820-822, 7 U.S.C. § 136a(c)(1)(D), reads in relevant part: "(i) With respect to pesticides containing active

Parmanand Choudhary and ors. Vs. Smt. Shukla Devi Mishra and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53(2), 283(1), 397, 398 and 485; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 6 and 9

Reported in : [1990]67CompCas45(MP)

assets and liabilities of that business and to carry on that business of manufacturing and selling of pesticides, insecticides and other plant protection chemicals. The other objects of the company are set forth in the memorandum of … on September 17, 1981, by the M. P. Finance Corporation under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, as amended by the Amending Act of 1972 ; the first act of mismanagement alleged was of not holding any … C.P. Sen, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 485 of the Companies Act, 1956, by the appellants/petitioners against rejection of … Act, 1956, by the appellants/petitioners against rejection of their petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Act, for relief against oppression and mismanagement, by

Sansar Chand. Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Section 55; Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 51; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 313

kill the frogs the insects will increase and this will require more insecticides. Use of much insecticide may create health problems. To give another example, … trophies. Chapter VI makes violation of the provisions of the Act a criminal offence. By the Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 the punishment has been increased vide Section 51 as amended, and the property derived from illegal hunting … ecological chain and ecological balance in our environment.4. The appellant herein has been convicted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 by all the three courts below and now he is in appeal before us.5. Before dealing with the … Book', which once abounded in India, is rarely to be seen today. 3. This case reveals how avaricious and rapacious persons have by organized crime

M.k. Ranjitsinh Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of no-grazing zones and restricted grazing zones in critical and semi-critical habitats, a prohibition on the use of insecticides and pesticides within a radius of 5 km of critical habitats and a prohibition on the encroachment of … They are: i. The GIB is listed in Part III of Schedule I of the Wild Life (Protection) Act 1972. The species listed in Schedule I are granted the highest level of protection from hunting, in terms of … of Contents A. The Great Indian Bustard ....................................................................................................... 3 B. The judgment dated 19 April 2021 and … Act 2010, amongst others. In 2022, the Energy Conservation Act 2001 was amended to empower the Central Government to provide for a carbon credit trading … to climate change and the attendant concerns. 15 Energy Conservation Act 2001, Section 14(w). 17 | P age However, this does not mean that the

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and Others

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Intellectual Property

representations by way of oppositions under section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) with request for hearing under rule 55 of the Patents Rules, … step or industrial application. This provision remained in force in India till 1972 when the Patents Act, 1970 was brought into force. The English Courts … plurality of distinct inventions. 4. Claims 11 and 15 fall within the scope of sub clause (e) of section 3 of the Patents Act, 1970. 5. The question of unity of the invention will be considered after the

Bates Vs. Dow Agrosciences Llc

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

Hursh, Annotation, Liability of Manufacturer or Seller for Injury Caused by Animal Feed or Medicines, Crop Sprays, Fertilizers, Insecticides, Rodenticides, and Similar Products, 81 A. L. R. 2d 138, 144 (1962) (“A duty of due, reasonable care … responsibility for this registration process. In 1972, spurred by growing environmental and safety concerns, Congress adopted the extensive amendments[ Footnote 9 ] that “transformed FIFRA from a labeling law into a comprehensive regulatory statute.” Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto … if it determines that a registered pesticide is misbranded.[ Footnote 11 ] Section 136v, which was added in the 1972 amendments, addresses the States’ continuing … the manufacturer to change its label. Pp. 9-13. 3. Petitioners’ fraud and negligent-failure-to-warn claims, by contrast, are … registered pursuant to its authority under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Petitioners gave Dow notice of their intent to sue, claiming that

Dr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 26, 27 and 36; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 39, 41 and 42; Clean Air Acts

Reported in : AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)

of a letter by one Dr. Ashok addressed to the Chief Justice of India indicating therein that several insecticides, colour additives, food additives are in widespread use in this country which have already been banned in several … in the legislation itself, and therefore, steps should be taken for appropriate amendment to the legislation. In the net result, therefore, writ petition is disposed … and after consultation with the Registration Committee set up under the Insecticides Act 1968 cancelled the Certificate of Registration in respect ofAaldrin, restricted the use … of America by the Environmental Protection Agency since 1972. Soon thereafter the said insecticide has been banned … of Section 27 the Certificate of Registration of any insecticide specified in Sub-clause (iii) of clause (e) of Section 3 or any specific batch thereof can be cancelled if the Central Government is of the opinion for reasons

Thomas Vs. Union Carbide

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

S. 986 (1984). Monsanto examined whether FIFRA's data-consideration provision effects an uncompensated taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment. In this case, we address whether Article III of the Constitution prohibits Congress from selecting binding arbitration with … to correct problems created by the Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act of 1972, 86 Stat. 973 (1972 Act), itself a major revision of prior law. … 568 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Syllabus The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) requires manufacturers of pesticides, as a precondition for registering a pesticide, to submit … application for registration of a similar product by another registrant ("follow-on" registrant). Section 3(c)(1)(D)(ii) of FIFRA authorizes EPA to consider certain previously submitted data only

WisconsIn Pub. Intervenor Vs. Mortier

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

by Congress into a comprehensive regulatory statute. Among other things, the 1972 amendments significantly strengthened the preexisting registration and labeling standards, specified that FIFRA regulates … purpose of giving to villages the largest measure of self-government in accordance with the spirit of article XI, section 3, of the [Wisconsin] constitution it is hereby declared that this chapter shall be liberally construed in favor of … 1991 Decided June 21, 1991 501 U.S. 597 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Syllabus The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA or Act), 7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq., was primarily a pesticide licensing

Bharat Pulverising Mills Ltd. Vs. the Joint Director of Agriculture (i ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1992)2MLJ511

ORDERK.S. Bakthavatsalam, J.1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of insecticides. The Agricultural Officer (Quality Control) of the office of the Assistant Director of Agriculture, Papanasam, took a sample … is otherwise deceptive in respect of its contents; orSection 14 of the Act provides for revocation, suspension and amendment of licences. Section 19 of the Act speaks above the appointment of persons as Insecticide Analysts by the … Director of Agriculture, Papanasam, took a sample of Plant Protection Chemical Monocrotophos 35% from the shop of the petitioner's dealer located at No. 37, Gandhi