Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: insecticides act 1968 section 8 · Page 1 of about 217 results (0.017 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 10 2001

Artee Minerals and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-10-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 8, 18, 24, 24(3), 24(4), 29 and 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(3)WLN658; 2002(3)WLN658

162/87 State v. Thakar Das Rajendra Kumar and Ors. for the offence under Section 2, 18/29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1968') pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Anoopgarh … so far as they relate to the present accused petitioners are quashed. Insecticide Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 8/29, 24(3) & 24(4)--Complaint filed against petitioners for the offence Under Sections 3 and 8/29 of Insecticide Act--However it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 1986

Agromore Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-28-1986

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1987)(11)ECC194

Latex Stimulant (iii) Fruitone and (iv) Transplantons were classified as pesticides by the Government of India under the Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 3(e)(i)(ii) Schedule - Appendix I items 219 and 258.Notification No. 55/75 does not give an explanation as to … Insecticides Act,1968 the said four products were pesticides. The appellant had also placed reliance on a letter dated 8.4.1982 from the Under Secretary, Government of India, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation addressed to the appellant to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 14 1991

Ravi Parkash S/O Shri Gian Chand and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-14-1991

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 7, 13, 17, 18, 23, 29, 30, 30(1), 30(3), 30(8) and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Prevention of Food Adulteration Act

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2538

the decision of the Division Bench of this Court partaining to the cancellation of the licence under the Insecticides Act, 1968, in the last paragraph of the judgment had observed as under :--'The High Court took the view that … petition is, whether a dealer of insecticides contained in sealed tins can be prosecuted for the offences Under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18 and 13 punishable Under Section 29 of the Insecticides Act read with Rule 27(5) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 03 1997

Northern Minerals Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-03-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : (1997)115PLR722

2 by the Quality Control Inspector was misbranded and why action be not taken against them under the Insecticides Act, 1968? Petitioner No. 1 gave reply Annexure P-4 to the show cause notice, requesting the Licensing Officer-cum-Deputy Director of … and that the other sample be sent to the Central Insecticides Laboratory for analysis under the provisions of section 24 (3) and (4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the rules framed thereunder and that they would

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2010

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-21-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules

the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases in relation to Prevention of Food … after shelf life of the product and `best before period' had already lapsed and therefore valuable right under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act was lost and therefore the prosecution of the applicant or the … 66 of 2009, so also the tenability of Criminal Case Nos. 393/2000, 81/1999, 31/1999, 5/1999, 18/2000, 463/2007 and 10 of 1999.2. In view of huge

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2006

Hyderabad Chemical Supplies Limited Vs. United Phosphorus Limited and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 8, 13, 35, 39, 57, 58, 64, 99, 104, 104A, 105, 106, 107, 107(1), 116, 117, 117A, 117B, 117C, 117D, 117E and 117G; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 9(3) and 9(4); Patents Act, 1997

Reported in : 2006(6)ALT515

expression 'patent' and had drawn the attention of this Court to Section 9(3) and Section 9(4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968. The Counsel would further maintain that in the light of the clear provisions specified under Section 64 of … claim;(m) that the applicant for the patent has failed to disclose to the Controller the information required by Section 8 or has furnished information which in any material particular was false to his knowledge;(n) that the applicant contravened

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2020

Union of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

PROVISIONS SIMILAR TO SECTION221)(d) OF THE ACT112 We may notice that the Seeds Act, 1966 (Section 14(1)(e), the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Section 21(f)), the Kerala Fish Seed Act, 2014 (Section 19(1)(e), Uttarakhand 143 Ground Water (Regulation and Control of Development … The explanation and action taken against him, shall be forwarded to the Court by the Competent Authority within 8 weeks from today through Registrar General of this Court who shall place the same before us for perusal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2012

Maliakkal Industrial Enterprises Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-15-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Section 38 of the plenary legislation, viz., the Insecticides Act, 1968. 8. Apart from that, the condition violates the fundamental rights of the petitioners … India, the respondents can insist upon the petitioners in these writ petitions to obtain a registration under the Insecticides Act, 1968, as a condition for obtaining a licence to import of boric acid, if such import is not for … prescribed in the export-import policy by the Central Government by virtue of the powers conferred on them under Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. It is pursuant to the said power, that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1996

Bharat Palverising Mills Ltd. Vs. Collr. of Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-03-1996

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1997)(93)ELT628Tri(Mum.)bai

clearance thereof under OGL. They initially filed Into Bond Bill of Entry. The item imported was covered under Insecticides Act, 1968. The appellants were holding Registration Certificate issued under Section 9 of the said Act. The said Certificates however

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2021

M/s Cheminova India Ltd. Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-04-2021

Subject : MRTP

Amritsar under 1 [email protected].(Crl.)No.4102 of 2020 Section 3(k)(i), 17, 18 and 33 punishable under Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) read with Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971.3. On 10.02.2011, Insecticide … 17.02.2011, after drawing on 10.02.2011, and the report of analysis was received on 14.03.2011, as such the said 8 [email protected].(Crl.)No.4102 of 2020 date is said to be the crucial date for commencement of period of limitation. By

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial