Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: insecticides act 1968 section 7 · Page 1 of about 228 results (0.020 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 31 2001

A.K. Chauhan Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-31-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 9, 17, 18, 29, 30 and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 156(1) and 482; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 10; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4611

A.K. Chauhan, Chemist of Delta Insecticides Ltd. under Sections 3(k)(i), 9, 17, 18,29, 30, 3(c) and 33 of Insecticides Act, 1968 and Rule 10 of Insecticides Rules, 1971.2. On 2.7.1993 the business premises of M/s Garg Trading Co., Bareta … M.L. Singhal, J.1. Through this Cr!. Misc. Petition No. 6271 -M of 2000 filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Ashok Kumar Chauhan (petitioner) has sought the quashing of complaint Annexure

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1996

Tarsem Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-16-1996

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Fertilizer Control Order, 1985; Fertilizer Control Regulations - Regulation 19; Essential Commodities Act, 1950 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (1997)115PLR34

Insecticides Act, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Drugs and Cosmetics Act. Sub-section (4) of Section 24 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 has given right to a person who has notified his intention of adducing evidence in controversion of the … to take any action against the petitioner under the aforesaid notification and for quashing the F.I.R. registered under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act read with clause 19(1) of the Fertilizers Control Order, 1985, referred to above.3.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2006

Hyderabad Beverages Private Limited Etc. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(11), 8, 9A, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2A), 13(2B), 13(D), 13(2E), 13(2), 13(3), 13(5), 13(11), 15, 16, 16(1), 21(3) and 114; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7, 19, 16(2), 14(1) and 15(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21(1), 22, 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 30(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 2000; Central Insecticides Laboratory - Sections 24, 24(3) and 24(4); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 15(3), 15(4), 25, 25(3) and 25(4); Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 26, 33B and 33O; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 18A; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921; Tenants Act - Sections 3 and 9; Indian Penal Co

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3988

under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, (hereinafter referred to as PFA Act), the Seeds Act and the Insecticides Act. It is therefore convenient to refer to the relevant statutory provisions, the rules and the judgments under each … or part thereof taken for analysis.30. Rule 21 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 prescribes the duties of a Seed Analyst and reads as under:On receipt … Guntur are sought to be quashed. 9. The complaint in C.C. No. 37 of 2004 was filed under Section 7(b) read with Section 19 of the Seeds Act, 1966. Allegations In the complaint are that, on 24.7.2003, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 25 2005

Knight Queen Industries (P) Ltd. Through Its Authorised Signatory Sh. ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-25-2005

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3A, 3A(1), 3D, 4, 21 and 21(2); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 7, 8A and 15; Uttar Pradesh Trdde Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 2000; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21 and 21(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 9(4); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act; Gujarat Sales Act, 1969; Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 6; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax (Amendment) Act; Central Excise Act; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Constitution of India - Article 136; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 19(3) and 19(4); Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Rules, 1948 - Rule 41(1) and 41(7); Customs Act; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 2; Sales Tax Law

Reported in : [2006]145STC226(All)

using chemicals for manufacturing the finished goods which have been treated as 'insecticides' under the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and photostate copies of the Certificate of Registration of the license issued under Section 9(4) of the 'Insecticide' … wherein in column 7 he has mentioned the commodity traded as ' Mosquito Repellent, Mats/Coils etc'. Similarly under Section 7 of the Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as Act') the petitioner applied for registration in '

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2001

G.S. Prasad and ors. Vs. State Represented by the Assistant Director o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-2001

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Seeds Act, 1996 - Sections 13(2), 15, 15(3), 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 19; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rule 21 and 21(3); Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 7(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)314; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)231

which are hit by the Rule, would get vitiated. The Supreme Court while interpreting Section 24 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 which is in pari materia to Rule 21 (3) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 observed:'Then in order to … East Godavari District filed a complaint against the petitioners herein and two others purporting it to be under Section 7(b) read with Section 19 of the Seeds Act, 1966 (for short 'the Act').In the complaint, it is inter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 14 1991

Ravi Parkash S/O Shri Gian Chand and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-14-1991

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 7, 13, 17, 18, 23, 29, 30, 30(1), 30(3), 30(8) and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Prevention of Food Adulteration Act

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2538

the decision of the Division Bench of this Court partaining to the cancellation of the licence under the Insecticides Act, 1968, in the last paragraph of the judgment had observed as under :--'The High Court took the view that … or use of such insecticide or of the circumstances of its manufacture or import.(2) For the purposes of Section 7, an insecticide shall not be deemed to be misbranded only by reason of the fact that --'(a) there

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1986

Artee Minerals and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-10-1986

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987CriLJ1086; 1987(1)WLN94

registration of the case against them, on complaint filed by the Asstt. Inspector, Udaipur, Agriculture Quality Control under Insecticides Act, 1968. Petitioner 1 is the firm and petitioners 2 to 5 are its partners. The petitioner 6 is the … its partners. The petitioner 6 is the Chief Executive and the petitioner 7 is the Senior Sales Representative. In para 12 of the complaint, the … of the complaint, it would be obvious that the contents of this para lack the requisite requirements of Section 33. It should have been clearly alleged that the persons, who are being prosecuted are the persons who

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2001

Mehta Krishi Kendra and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-03-2001

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Fertilizers (Control) Order, 1985 - Regulation 19 and 19(1); Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 19 and 21; Insecticides Act, 1968; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj472; 2002(1)WLN264

and Haryana High Court in the case of Tarsem Singh (Supra) held that in every enactment, for example Insecticides Act, 1968, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 there is a provision to send … that these misc. petitions have no force and they should be dismissed. 7. I have heard both. 8. In my considered opinion, the argument raised … Garg, J. 1. These two criminal misc. petitions which have been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are being decided by a common order as common questions of law and facts are involved

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1997

Dr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-1997

Subject : Environment

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 26, 27 and 36; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 39, 41 and 42; Clean Air Acts

Reported in : AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)

considering the recommendations of the Expert Committee and after consultation with the Registration Committee set up under the Insecticides Act 1968 cancelled the Certificate of Registration in respect ofAaldrin, restricted the use of Dieldrin, for Locust Control in desert … Cases, the Notification dated 1.1.1996 of the Central Government issued in exercise of powers under Sub-section (2) of Section 27 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 phasing out progressively the manufacture and use of Benzene Hexachloride and directing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 1997

Northern Minerals Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-03-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : (1997)115PLR722

2 by the Quality Control Inspector was misbranded and why action be not taken against them under the Insecticides Act, 1968? Petitioner No. 1 gave reply Annexure P-4 to the show cause notice, requesting the Licensing Officer-cum-Deputy Director of … and that the other sample be sent to the Central Insecticides Laboratory for analysis under the provisions of section 24 (3) and (4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the rules framed thereunder and that they would … today. It be checked and registered. Notice to accused be issued for 7.4.1992.' On 7.4.1992 the following order was passed :'Notice to accused not issued.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial