Advanced Search Results
M/S.Saidharani Shakambari Pvt. Lt Vs. The Commissioner and Director of ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-10-2015
MRTP
the respondent along with the said Memo, it is stated that these products are not covered either under Insecticides Act, 1968 or under Fertilizer Control (Order) Act, 1985. The substance of the Memo is that since these products are … the power to make rules in Section 36. The State Government is also empowered to make rule under Section 37. In accordance with the rule making power, the Central Government made the rules, called the Insecticides Rules, 1971.13.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Maliakkal Industrial Enterprises
Kerala
Jun-03-2014
Education
i). Whether an insecticide, which has non-insecticidal uses, can be regulated in view of Section 38 of the Insecticides Act 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short). ii). Whether the policy of the Government as manifested in … origin from which the material is proposed to be imported. :6. Purpose of imported W.A. Nos.617/2012 & others 37 (specify the use and enclose valid licence to work, a factory licence issued by Chief Factories inspector showing
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKnight Queen Industries (P) Ltd. Through Its Authorised Signatory Sh. ...
Allahabad
Nov-25-2005
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3A, 3A(1), 3D, 4, 21 and 21(2); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 7, 8A and 15; Uttar Pradesh Trdde Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 2000; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21 and 21(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 9(4); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act; Gujarat Sales Act, 1969; Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 6; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax (Amendment) Act; Central Excise Act; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Constitution of India - Article 136; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 19(3) and 19(4); Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Rules, 1948 - Rule 41(1) and 41(7); Customs Act; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 2; Sales Tax Law
[2006]145STC226(All)
using chemicals for manufacturing the finished goods which have been treated as 'insecticides' under the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and photostate copies of the Certificate of Registration of the license issued under Section 9(4) of the 'Insecticide' … Act 1947 was answered by the Orissa High Court in State of Orissa v. Janta Medical Stores (1976) 37 STC 33 in the negative. To the same effect is the decision of this Court in Indo International
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri Aravind Neelar S/O Pandappa Neelar vs the State of Karnataka
Karnataka Dharwad
Aug-01-2025
the Court of Civil Judge and JMFC, Gokak, registered for offence punishable under Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticide Act, 1968 and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, is before this Court with a prayer … 102649 OF 2024 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SHRI ARAVIND NEELAR S/O PANDAPPA NEELAR, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O: CTS NO.4883, “SHRI PARIHARA SADAN”, FULBAG GALLI, … BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI-590 001. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVRAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE)AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY INSECTICIDE INSPECTOR AND ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, SHRI A.D. SAVADATTI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: THE OFFICE OF THE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Competent Authority Vs Karur District LLIN Fabric and Bednet Manuf ...
Chennai
Mar-23-2026
is stated by the Writ Petitioners that 2nd respondent is astatutory body constituted under Section 5 of “the Insecticides Act, 1968” (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). As per Section 5(5) of the Act, the 2nd respondent is empowered
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD. Rama Moorthy, Managing Director, S.S.D. Oil Mills Company Ltd. Chen ...
Kerala
Feb-21-2012
Land Acquisition
consequence." 12. In M/s.Gupta Chemicals Pvt.Ltd v. State of Rajasthan (2002 (2) FAC 148), the prosecution was under Insecticides Act 1968. Shelf life of the sample of the insecticide seized had expired and for that reason no further steps … private complaint filed on 3.6.2003 by the 1st respondent herein, the Food Inspector, Perambara, alleging offences punishable under Section 16(1)(a)(i) read with Section 7(i) and Section 2(ia)(a)(m) of the Prevention of Food Adultration Act (Act 37 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Asks.n. Subrahmanyam vs.state
Delhi
Nov-19-2018
Land Acquisition
17(1) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short, „PFA Act”); and Section 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short, “Insecticides Act”).42. On corporate criminal liability, the following observations of a constitution bench of Supreme Court … 32), latrines and urinals (Section 33), accommodation (Section 34), Creches (Section 35), First-aid (Section 36), Canteens, etc. (Section 37).15. The seventh chapter (―safety and health measures‖) is what is crucial to the present case. It confers, by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Sharma
Supreme Court of India
Aug-28-2020
Land Acquisition
PROVISIONS SIMILAR TO SECTION221)(d) OF THE ACT112 We may notice that the Seeds Act, 1966 (Section 14(1)(e), the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Section 21(f)), the Kerala Fish Seed Act, 2014 (Section 19(1)(e), Uttarakhand 143 Ground Water (Regulation and Control of Development … Act, 1999, there is no express power of arrest, as such conferred. Instead, it is relevant to notice Section 37 of the said enactment: “37. Power of search, seizure, etc.- (1) The Director of Enforcement and other officers
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPruthviraj T K vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Apr-01-2026
OF HONBLE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CN HALLI, TUMAKUR FOR VIOLATION OF SECTION 29 (1) OF THE INSECTICIDES ACT, 1968 AT ANNEXURE - A AND B AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER … JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 8180 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:1. PRUTHVIRAJ T.K.,A REGISTERED PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN, S/O KUMARAIAH, AGED 37 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S. PRITHVI AGRO CENTRE, LOCATED AT ANJINEYA SWAMY TEMPLE ROAD, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI, TUMKUR -572 218.2. M/S. GIA
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSyngenta India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Delhi
Jul-01-2009
Commercial
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 5, 5(1), 9, 9(3B), 9(3C), 9(4), 10, 14 and 15; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 1977; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Insecticide Rule - Rules 4 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 39.2, 39.3 and 226
161(2009)DLT413
the decision of the Union Department of Agriculture, dated 5-11-2008, rejecting its appeal under Section 10 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 ('the Act') against the decision of the Registration Committee to granting for Emamectin Benzoate 5% SG to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »