Advanced Search Results

Hyderabad Chemical Supplies Limited Vs. United Phosphorus Limited and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 8, 13, 35, 39, 57, 58, 64, 99, 104, 104A, 105, 106, 107, 107(1), 116, 117, 117A, 117B, 117C, 117D, 117E and 117G; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 9(3) and 9(4); Patents Act, 1997

Reported in : 2006(6)ALT515

expression 'patent' and had drawn the attention of this Court to Section 9(3) and Section 9(4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968. The Counsel would further maintain that in the light of the clear provisions specified under Section 64 of … any material particular was false to his knowledge;(n) that the applicant contravened any direction for secrecy passed under Section 35 or made or caused to be made an application for the grant of a patent outside India in

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Essen Synthetics (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1987)(14)ECC169

order dated 14-7-1983, inter alia, held that insecticides had the same meaning as defined in Section 3 of Insecticides Act, -1968. The Schedule annexed to the Insecticides Act, 1968 did not include the two products DBP and DMP as … them by the Ministry of Defence. 3y Notification No.62/78-CE dated March 1, 1978, Central Government amended Notification No. 35/75-C.E. dated 1-3-1975 and added Serial No. 18 Insecticides, Pesticides, Weedicides and Fungicides in the Schedule appended to the

B.A.S.F. India Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3(A), 17, 18, 29(1) and 31(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2005CriLJ714; RLW2004(2)Raj1225; 2004WLC(Raj)UC350

ORDERIn exercise of the powers conferred under Sub-section (1) of Section 31 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Central Act 46 of 1968) and after careful examination of the case, I hereby give written consent on … Lok, Basant Bihar, New Delhi-110057.04: Dr. W. Burgert, R/o BASF South East Asia Pvt. Ltd., 7, Temasek Boulevard, 35-01, Suntee Tower One, Singapore 038987, Director of M/s B.A.S.F. India Ltd., 7, Basant Lok, Basant Bihar, New Delhi-110057.05:

Union of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

PROVISIONS SIMILAR TO SECTION221)(d) OF THE ACT112 We may notice that the Seeds Act, 1966 (Section 14(1)(e), the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Section 21(f)), the Kerala Fish Seed Act, 2014 (Section 19(1)(e), Uttarakhand 143 Ground Water (Regulation and Control of Development … DEEPAK MAHAJAN AND ANOTHER25 103. In Deepak Mahajan (supra), the question arose in the context of provisions of Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) and Section 104 of the Customs Act, 1962, which expressly

Union of India Vs. Maliakkal Industrial Enterprises

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

i). Whether an insecticide, which has non-insecticidal uses, can be regulated in view of Section 38 of the Insecticides Act 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short). ii). Whether the policy of the Government as manifested in … that the importer must obtain an import permit.27. We notice the modalities for granting W.A. Nos.617/2012 & others 35 registration/import permit for insecticides to be used for non agricultural/health purposes was introduced in the year 1991. Subsequently,

Gene Campaign . Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

use in the farmer's field without due approval from the CIB&RC would attract appropriate legal action under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Rules, 1971, made under the said Act Writ Petition (Civil) No.115 of 2004 Etc. Page 82 … tests can be meaningfully Writ Petition (Civil) No.115 of 2004 Etc. Page 35 of 260 considered, till such time it would not be advisable to … of 2004 Etc. Page 11 of 260 Rules”, for the sake of convenience), which have been framed under Sections 6, 8 and 25 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (“EP Act, 1986”, for short) in consonance with

Swastik Pesticides and Chemicals thro' Vijaykumar Vs. the State of Guj ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Insecticide Act, 1968 - Sections 3K, 3K(1), 17, 17(1), 18, 18(1), 21, 22, 22(4), 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 29 and 33; Companies Act, 1956; Food Adulteration Act; Drugs and Cosmetics Act; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 258 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2027

5) :'3. Despite the request having been made by the petitioner as envisaged under Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (herinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Admittedly, no sample was sent to the Central Insecticide Laboratory but the

Ravi Parkash S/O Shri Gian Chand and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 7, 13, 17, 18, 23, 29, 30, 30(1), 30(3), 30(8) and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Prevention of Food Adulteration Act

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2538

the decision of the Division Bench of this Court partaining to the cancellation of the licence under the Insecticides Act, 1968, in the last paragraph of the judgment had observed as under :--'The High Court took the view that … petition is, whether a dealer of insecticides contained in sealed tins can be prosecuted for the offences Under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18 and 13 punishable Under Section 29 of the Insecticides Act read with Rule 27(5) of

Ajay Pratap Singh. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sction 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 478, 412, 120; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Section 18, 31

chargesheet under Sections 409, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 18 of the Insecticides Act, 1968. After submission of the chargesheet, cognizance was taken and, while the case reached to the stage of charge,

s.n. Subrahmanyam vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

17(1) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short, „PFA Act”); and Section 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short, “Insecticides Act”).42. On corporate criminal liability, the following observations of a constitution bench of Supreme Court … other construction work (Section 31), drinking water (Section 32), latrines and urinals (Section 33), accommodation (Section 34), Creches (Section 35), First-aid (Section 36), Canteens, etc. (Section 37).15. The seventh chapter (―safety and health measures‖) is what is crucial