Advanced Search Results

Northern Minerals Limited Vs. Plant Protection Officer and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 22, 24, 24(2), 24(3), 24(4), 29(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200 and 482; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 34; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2008(105)DRJ159

30/01/91 dated 19th January, 1991 filed against it under Section 200 Cr.PC read with Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, be quashed.2. The petitioner is a manufacturer of insecticides. Amongst others, it manufactures the insecticide, Malathion 50% EC. … Insecticide Inspector to the Regional Pesticide Testing Laboratory at Chandigarh for testing and analysis in terms of Rule 34 of the Insecticides Rules, 1971. In the memorandum that accompanied the sample, the Inspector had clearly stated that

United Phospherus Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24, 24(4), 29 and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 258

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1681; 2002(5)WLN59

criminal original No. 478/94 dated 19th October, 94 taking cognizance against the petitioners under Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') hereinafter) and the present petitioners alongwith other accused were summoned. 2. Heard Mr. M.K. … insecticides manufactured from the premises and send them for test or analysis in accordance with the Rules. Rule 34 requires that the samples for test or analysis under the Act shall be sent by registered post or

s.n. Subrahmanyam vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

17(1) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short, „PFA Act”); and Section 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short, “Insecticides Act”).42. On corporate criminal liability, the following observations of a constitution bench of Supreme Court … certain building or other construction work (Section 31), drinking water (Section 32), latrines and urinals (Section 33), accommodation (Section 34), Creches (Section 35), First-aid (Section 36), Canteens, etc. (Section 37).15. The seventh chapter (―safety and health measures‖) is

Wadhawa Beej Bhandar and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 17(1), 21(1), 24(2), 29(1) and 30(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1374

the business premises of firm M/s. Wadhawa Beej Bhandar, Pipli and drew a sample of 2-4-D Ethyle Estor 34% EC Batch No. 18 under the provisions of Section 21(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 manufactured by accused … prayed that complaint annexure P/1 filed under Sections 29(1)(a) read with Section 3(k)(1) and Section 17(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 be quashed qua them so as to put a-stop to the abuse of the process of Court.2. It

Prabhakar Tulshiramji Mankar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17, 18 and 30(3); Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 10

Reported in : 2005(2)ALLMR34; 2005(2)BomCR268; 2005(1)MhLj228

174 of 1993, in respect of the same alleged misbranded insecticides, for offences under Sections 420, 486 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968. Mr. Naik, the learned counsel … of Insecticides holding licence Nos. AMT/203, AMT/283, AMT/320, AMT/336 and AMT/66 respectively issued under Section 13 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 read with Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Rules framed thereunder. On 29th August, 1990, the petitioners

Secunderabad Health Care Vs. Secunderabad Hospitals

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138,141 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 34(1)

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD613; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)206; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)293; 1998CriLJ4521

of A.P. Rep. by Joint Director of Agriculture, Guntur, 1990 (1) APLJ 313, while interpreting Section 33(1) of Insecticides Act, 1968 which is similar to Section 141 of the Act, this Court held that:'A3 and A4 are the Directors … of Haryana v. Brij Lal Mittal and others, 1998 (4) Supreme 364 the Apex Court while construing Section 34(1) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 which is exactly similar to Section 141 of the Act held:'It

Agromore Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1987)(11)ECC194

Latex Stimulant (iii) Fruitone and (iv) Transplantons were classified as pesticides by the Government of India under the Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 3(e)(i)(ii) Schedule - Appendix I items 219 and 258.Notification No. 55/75 does not give an explanation as to … without payment of Central Excise duty of Rs. 1,12,968.74 during the period from 1.3.1978 to 30.4.1980 and Rs. 34,201.42 during the period from 1.5.1980 to 31.7.1981 respectively. Two show cause notices dated 23.6.1981 and 25.9.1981 were issued

Union of India Vs. Maliakkal Industrial Enterprises

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

i). Whether an insecticide, which has non-insecticidal uses, can be regulated in view of Section 38 of the Insecticides Act 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short). ii). Whether the policy of the Government as manifested in … are taken care of and the registration is granted (Section 9(3)). The grant of W.A. Nos.617/2012 & others 34 registration, as already noticed, entitles the applicant to import goods which are registered in terms of Section 17,

M/s Cheminova India Ltd. Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Amritsar under 1 [email protected].(Crl.)No.4102 of 2020 Section 3(k)(i), 17, 18 and 33 punishable under Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) read with Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971.3. On 10.02.2011, Insecticide … on the ground that samples sent for analysis were found to contain active ingredient to the extent of 34.70% only as against the labelled declaration of 40%, alleging that it amounts to ‘misbranding’ within the meaning of

Syngenta India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 5, 5(1), 9, 9(3B), 9(3C), 9(4), 10, 14 and 15; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 1977; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Insecticide Rule - Rules 4 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 39.2, 39.3 and 226

Reported in : 161(2009)DLT413

the decision of the Union Department of Agriculture, dated 5-11-2008, rejecting its appeal under Section 10 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 ('the Act') against the decision of the Registration Committee to granting for Emamectin Benzoate 5% SG to the