Advanced Search Results
indofil Chemicals Company, Bombay and Others Vs. Kunwarsingh Madhaosin ...
Mumbai
Dec-07-1995
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 198, 199, 466, 468(2), 469 and 469(1)
1996CriLJ1234
case. The Government has framed Rules under the Insecticides Act, 1968 which is called Insecticides Rules, 1971. Rule 28 provides for the duties of Inspectors under the Act. It provides that it shall be the duty of … the Court below against the Petitioners alleging offence under Section 29(1)(b) and Section 9(1)(3) and Section 17(1)(c) of Insecticides Act, 1968. The allegation in the complaint is that the accused No. 1 is a company and accused Nos. 2
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...
Mumbai
Jun-21-2010
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules
the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases in relation to Prevention of Food … after shelf life of the product and `best before period' had already lapsed and therefore valuable right under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act was lost and therefore the prosecution of the applicant or the … till 30.4.1998 when he sent proposal for consent which he received on 28.12.1998. Thus the Joint Commissioner wasted eight months for giving consent unmindful of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNorthern Minerals Limited Vs. Plant Protection Officer and anr.
Delhi
Jul-16-2008
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 22, 24, 24(2), 24(3), 24(4), 29(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200 and 482; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 34; Constitution of India - Article 227
2008(105)DRJ159
30/01/91 dated 19th January, 1991 filed against it under Section 200 Cr.PC read with Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, be quashed.2. The petitioner is a manufacturer of insecticides. Amongst others, it manufactures the insecticide, Malathion 50% EC. … proceeding in respect of the sample is pending, that he intends to adduce evidence controverting the report, within 28 days of the receipt of a copy of such report. According to the petitioner, even before filing of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Swastik Pesticides and Chemicals thro' Vijaykumar Vs. the State of Guj ...
Gujarat
May-13-2005
CriminalFood Adulteration
Insecticide Act, 1968 - Sections 3K, 3K(1), 17, 17(1), 18, 18(1), 21, 22, 22(4), 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 29 and 33; Companies Act, 1956; Food Adulteration Act; Drugs and Cosmetics Act; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 258 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
(2005)3GLR2027
5) :'3. Despite the request having been made by the petitioner as envisaged under Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (herinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Admittedly, no sample was sent to the Central Insecticide Laboratory but the … at their own costs as per the provisions of Section 24(3) of the Act, within stipulated period of 28 days to the complainant as per the Act. The say of the petitioner is that despite a request
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSyngenta India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Delhi
Jul-01-2009
Commercial
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 5, 5(1), 9, 9(3B), 9(3C), 9(4), 10, 14 and 15; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 1977; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Insecticide Rule - Rules 4 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 39.2, 39.3 and 226
161(2009)DLT413
the decision of the Union Department of Agriculture, dated 5-11-2008, rejecting its appeal under Section 10 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 ('the Act') against the decision of the Registration Committee to granting for Emamectin Benzoate 5% SG to the … registered in the country under Section 9(3) as of how; that in terms of the policy enunciated in 284th meeting of the Registration Committee, the technical would be deemed to be registered after three years form the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFauji Sewa Centre Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-10-2006
Civil
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17, 18, 18(1), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 29 and 33; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Criminla Procedure Code , 1974 - Sections 482
2006CriLJ1386; 2006FAJ246
the petitioners are said to have committed offences punishable under Sections 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, hereinafter referred to as the Act. Show cause notice dated 9-1-1989 Annexure P/3 was sent to M/s. Goel … cause notice to the Insecticides Inspector or to the Court concerned within 28 days from the receipt of copy of the report of the Government … and petitioner Nos. 3 to 7, distributors, dealing in the sale of insecticides and pesticides filed petition under Section 482, Cr. P.C. for quashing of the complaint An-nexure P/l dated 14-9-1990 filed by the Insecticides Inspector, Gurdaspur
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent: Mr. Sandeep Vermani Advocate Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-28-2013
Land Acquisition
Misc.-M No.23692 of 2011) filed under Sections 3 (k) (i).17, 18 and 33 punishable under Section 29 of Insecticides Act, 1968. As per the petitioner, he cannot be held vicariously liable because he had already resigned as Director of … Chambel Fertilizers and Chemical Limited. In second case i.e.Criminal Misc.-M No.23692 of 2011, the samples were taken on 28.07.2005. The said samples were sent to laboratory for testing/analyzing and the same were declared misbranded with remarks “the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjay Pratap Singh. Vs. State of Bihar.
Patna
Jan-31-2011
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sction 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 478, 412, 120; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Section 18, 31
chargesheet under Sections 409, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 18 of the Insecticides Act, 1968. After submission of the chargesheet, cognizance was taken and, while the case reached to the stage of charge, … Thakur, Junior Plant Protection Officer, Patna were also present. The verification report was sent to the Government on 28.7.1984. It was further alleged that during physical verification of the stock, value of pesticides were found short for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Venkateswara Rao and anr. Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Public Pro ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-30-2004
Civil
Essential Commodities Act - Sections 3, 6A to 6E, 10A, 10AA and 11; ;Insecticides (Price, Stock, Display and Submission of Reports) Order, 1986
2004(2)ALD(Cri)108; 2004CriLJ3384
Insecticide Inspector means, the Insecticide Inspector appointed by the Central or State Government under Section 20 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and Sections 20 and 21 of the Insecticides Act are para material with Clauses 27-A and 28 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Central Excise Vs. Essen Synthetics (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Aug-18-1987
Excise
(1987)(14)ECC169
order dated 14-7-1983, inter alia, held that insecticides had the same meaning as defined in Section 3 of Insecticides Act, -1968. The Schedule annexed to the Insecticides Act, 1968 did not include the two products DBP and DMP as … the two products is consumed by the Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India. Earlier, the appellants till February 28, 1978 were paying Central Excise duty on the products under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »