Advanced Search Results
Dr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others
Supreme Court of India
May-02-1997
Environment
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 26, 27 and 36; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 39, 41 and 42; Clean Air Acts
AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)
Cases, the Notification dated 1.1.1996 of the Central Government issued in exercise of powers under Sub-section (2) of Section 27 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 phasing out progressively the manufacture and use of Benzene Hexachloride and directing that … considering the recommendations of the Expert Committee and after consultation with the Registration Committee set up under the Insecticides Act 1968 cancelled the Certificate of Registration in respect ofAaldrin, restricted the use of Dieldrin, for Locust Control in desert
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjay Handa Vs. the State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-24-1994
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 3K(1), 17, 18, 18(2), 24, 27(5), 29, 31, 31(1) and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 25(5) and 27(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 155(2), 156(1) and 482
1995CriLJ2002
N.K. Kapoor, J.1. Petitioner seeks quashing of complaint under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short 'the Act') read with Section/Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971, (for short 'the Rules') and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.M.P. Private Limited Vs. the State
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-24-1980
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24, 24(3), 24(4), 27 and 29(1)
1981CriLJ764
Street, Bombay, as the 1st, 2nd and 3rd accused respectively, for an offence punishable under Section 29(1)(a) ofthe Insecticides Act, 1968 (which will hereinafter be referred to as the Act). The Insecticides in question is Malstan EC 50 and … any insecticide which is not registered under the Act or the sale of which is expressly prohibited under Section 27 of the Act. The Act also prohibits the sale of any insecticide in controversion of any of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Syngenta Crop Protection Pvt. Limited Rep. by Its Commercial Manager a ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-11-2007
Constitution
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 3, 26, 27, 27(1) and 27(2)
2007(6)ALD683; 2007(6)ALT1; 2007CriLJ4773
the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the 1st respondent herein, in exercise of powers under Section 27 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short 'the Act); is challenged.2. The petitioners are the manufacturers, or distributors, as the case may be,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaldev Krishan and ors. Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-25-1991
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 17, 18, 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 29 and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5)
1992CriLJ2444
Malout, have moved this Court for quashing complaint under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, and Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971, filed against them and the manufacturer M/s. Thakar Chemicals, New … are partners of M/s. Kisan Beej Bhandar, Gur Bazar, Malout, have moved this Court for quashing complaint under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, and Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavi Parkash S/O Shri Gian Chand and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-14-1991
CriminalFood Adulteration
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 7, 13, 17, 18, 23, 29, 30, 30(1), 30(3), 30(8) and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Prevention of Food Adulteration Act
1991CriLJ2538
the decision of the Division Bench of this Court partaining to the cancellation of the licence under the Insecticides Act, 1968, in the last paragraph of the judgment had observed as under :--'The High Court took the view that … petition is, whether a dealer of insecticides contained in sealed tins can be prosecuted for the offences Under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18 and 13 punishable Under Section 29 of the Insecticides Act read with Rule 27(5) of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJindal Brothers and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-31-1993
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 17, 18, 24(4), 29, 30(3), 31 and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Companies Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482
1993CriLJ3691
by Baldev Singh, Insecticide Inspector against the petitioners under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 read with Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Gidderbaha.2. The … Harmohinder Kaur Sandhu, J. 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of complaint dated 2-4-1992 (Annexure P-7) filed by Baldev
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKissan Brothers Faridkot Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-25-2000
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 15, 17, 18. 29, 30(3) and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5)
2001CriLJ234
Inspite of this, the sample was declared misbranded. The petitioner filed an appeal under Section 15 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The Joint Director (Plant protection), Punjab, Chandigarh, vide his order dated 10-5-1999, … been filed under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 read with Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971.2. In similar circumstances, this Court quashed the proceedings in the case of M/s.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSh. Hanuman Sharma Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-03-1992
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Insecticide Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 17, 18, 22(6), 29 and 33; Insecticide Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5)
1993CriLJ124
present petitioner. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has referred to Sub-section (6) of Section 22 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, which is reproduced as under:-'(6) The insecticide Inspector shall restore one, portion of a sample so divided or … a complaint under Sections 3(k), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticide Act 1968 read with Rule 27(5) of the Insecticide Rules 1971. The main allegation in the complaint is that Aldrin 30% E.C. is manufactured
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Kamlesh Purkait and anr. Vs. Sri Sambhunath Dey, Drug Inspector an ...
Kolkata
Jan-21-2000
CivilFood Adulteration
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 27(4) and 28A(4);; Companies Act, 1956;; Insecticides Act, 1968;; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
(2000)3CALLT424(HC)
a Judgment of the Hon'ble apex Court reported in : 2000CriLJ2962 , which is a case under the insecticides Act. 1968. In the said Judgment it was held by the Hon'ble apex Court as follows :--'The procedure for testing … Revision No. 143 of 1997) is for quashing of a proceeding before C.R. Case No. 1169/ 96 under sections 27 and 28A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 now pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »