Advanced Search Results

M/s Cheminova India Ltd. Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Amritsar under 1 [email protected].(Crl.)No.4102 of 2020 Section 3(k)(i), 17, 18 and 33 punishable under Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) read with Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971.3. On 10.02.2011, Insecticide

Dr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 26, 27 and 36; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 39, 41 and 42; Clean Air Acts

Reported in : AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)

considering the recommendations of the Expert Committee and after consultation with the Registration Committee set up under the Insecticides Act 1968 cancelled the Certificate of Registration in respect ofAaldrin, restricted the use of Dieldrin, for Locust Control in desert … issued under Section 13. Section 17 is the prohibition for import as well as manufacture of certain insecticides. Section 26 is the power of the State Government to require any person or class of persons to report occurrence

Syngenta India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 5, 5(1), 9, 9(3B), 9(3C), 9(4), 10, 14 and 15; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 1977; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Insecticide Rule - Rules 4 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 39.2, 39.3 and 226

Reported in : 161(2009)DLT413

the decision of the Union Department of Agriculture, dated 5-11-2008, rejecting its appeal under Section 10 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 ('the Act') against the decision of the Registration Committee to granting for Emamectin Benzoate 5% SG to the … granting for Emamectin Benzoate 5% SG to the third respondent, (hereafter 'Jaishree') in its 293rd meeting held o 26.09.2008.2. The facts necessary for deciding the case are that with the Act was brought into force with express

Gaur Hari Guchhait & Ors vs.shogun Organics Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Allethrin, an application was preferred by the original plaintiff in the year 1995 under Section 9 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1968, Act”).  On 17th March, 1997, the original plaintiff was granted registration … by the counsel for respondent (original plaintiff) that neither under Section 30 of the 1970, Act nor under Section 26 of the Patents and Designs Act, 1911, disclosing the process of manufacturing to the Government authority would tantamount

Syngenta Crop Protection Pvt. Limited Rep. by Its Commercial Manager a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 3, 26, 27, 27(1) and 27(2)

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD683; 2007(6)ALT1; 2007CriLJ4773

the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the 1st respondent herein, in exercise of powers under Section 27 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short 'the Act); is challenged.2. The petitioners are the manufacturers, or distributors, as the case may be, … Prohibition of sale, etc., of insecticides for reasons of public safety:(1) If, on receipt of a report under Section 26 or otherwise, the Central Government or the State Government is of opinion, for reasons to be recorded in

Northern Minerals Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : (1997)115PLR722

2 by the Quality Control Inspector was misbranded and why action be not taken against them under the Insecticides Act, 1968? Petitioner No. 1 gave reply Annexure P-4 to the show cause notice, requesting the Licensing Officer-cum-Deputy Director of … and that the other sample be sent to the Central Insecticides Laboratory for analysis under the provisions of section 24 (3) and (4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the rules framed thereunder and that they would … M.L. Singhal, J.1. On 26.6.1991 Quality Control Inspector drew a sample of Phorate 10-G, Batch No. 2524,

United Phospherus Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24, 24(4), 29 and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 258

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1681; 2002(5)WLN59

criminal original No. 478/94 dated 19th October, 94 taking cognizance against the petitioners under Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') hereinafter) and the present petitioners alongwith other accused were summoned. 2. Heard Mr. M.K. … for cognizance and trial of the offences and Section 33 deals with the offences committed by the companies. 26. The combined reading of the relevant provisions of the act and the judgments is that the complaint was

Ajay Handa Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 3K(1), 17, 18, 18(2), 24, 27(5), 29, 31, 31(1) and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 25(5) and 27(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 155(2), 156(1) and 482

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2002

N.K. Kapoor, J.1. Petitioner seeks quashing of complaint under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short 'the Act') read with Section/Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971, (for short 'the Rules') and … per analysis report, 19.63% active ingredient contents instead of 50%. The report of the insecticide analysis is dated 26-6-1991. It states that the sample does not conform to ISI specifications with respect to its per cent active

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Essen Synthetics (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1987)(14)ECC169

order dated 14-7-1983, inter alia, held that insecticides had the same meaning as defined in Section 3 of Insecticides Act, -1968. The Schedule annexed to the Insecticides Act, 1968 did not include the two products DBP and DMP as … Excise duty which it would have otherwise charged and collected. Drawing attention to the Show Cause [Notice dated 26-12-1979, he submitted that the proposal in the Show Cause Notice appeared to be to demand duty in respect

Mohinder Singh Chauhan S/O Shri Virender Singh Chauhan, Vs. State of H ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3(K)(1), 17, 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 29(3) and 33; Insecticides Rules; Companies Act

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2656

Central Insecticides Laboratory for re-testing as per the provisions laid down under Section 24(3) and 24(4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and rules made thereunder.xxxxx8. IT is clear from the above reproduced contents that on receipt of copy of … under:-'Summons not received back. Now fresh summons be issued under Section 29(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 for 26.5.2000 on filing the process fee.3.3.2000 Sd.. CJM, Faridabad.'11. Thus, it is clearfrom the above order that the petitioners