Advanced Search Results

Mohan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17(1), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 29(1)A; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 25

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2623

notify to the inspector his intention to adduce evidence in controversion of the report. The provisions of the Section 25 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 are identical to the provisions of Section 24 of the Insecticides … for dropping the proceedings against him pending in his Court under Section 17(1)A r/w Section 29(1)A of the Insecticides Act, 1968.2. Mr. Bhansali, learned counsel for the petitioner, pointing out that the petitioner has been denied the right

United Phosphorus Ltd., Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 31(1); Drugs and Cosmetics Act - Sections 25 and 25(4)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR973

24 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, even after filing of the complaint in the Court.8. The interpretation of Section 25 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act (23 of 1940) was subject matter of consideration in Ramanbhai B. Patel … analysis issued by their own laboratory. The necessary sanction was accorded as required Under Section 31(1) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, on 1.4.1998 by the Commissioner of Agriculture. The Insecticide Inspector lodged complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad

Ajay Handa Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 3K(1), 17, 18, 18(2), 24, 27(5), 29, 31, 31(1) and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 25(5) and 27(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 155(2), 156(1) and 482

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2002

N.K. Kapoor, J.1. Petitioner seeks quashing of complaint under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short 'the Act') read with Section/Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971, (for short 'the Rules') and … has violated the provisions of Section 3(i)(k), 17, 18, 24 and 33 of the Act read with Rule 25(5) of the Rules. After noticing, the sanctioning authority in exercise of his powers vested in him vide notification

Biochem Pharmaceutical and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 18A, 22, 23, 23(4), 25 and 27; Insecticides Act, 1968; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 121(2005)DLT207; 2005(82)DRJ653

Act as well as those on the Drugs and Cosmetics Act will be relevant for the analysis. The Insecticides Act, 1968 has very similar provisions. Both Insecticides Act and the Drugs and Cosmetics Act require the sample to be … Government Analyst's report and intended to adduce evidence in controversion of the test report as provided for under Section 25 of the Act and requested that sealed sample portion of the drug be sent to them. On 16.1.1998,

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules

the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases in relation to Prevention of Food … in Section 30 minimum sentence is provided which is not provided under Insecticides Act or the Seeds Act.(O) Section 25 of the Act reads thus:Reports of Government Analysts. (1) The Government Analyst to whom a sample of any

Mohinder Singh Chauhan S/O Shri Virender Singh Chauhan, Vs. State of H ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3(K)(1), 17, 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 29(3) and 33; Insecticides Rules; Companies Act

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2656

Central Insecticides Laboratory for re-testing as per the provisions laid down under Section 24(3) and 24(4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and rules made thereunder.xxxxx8. IT is clear from the above reproduced contents that on receipt of copy of … instead, filed a complaint (Annexure P-4) against the petitioners in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad, on 25.1.2000. By the time, the petitioners were ordered to be summoned by the court, shelf life of the sample

M/s Cheminova India Ltd. Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Amritsar under 1 [email protected].(Crl.)No.4102 of 2020 Section 3(k)(i), 17, 18 and 33 punishable under Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) read with Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971.3. On 10.02.2011, Insecticide … far as the appellants are concerned. Appellants have approached the High Court seeking quashing of Complaint No.26 dated 25.03.2014 filed by the second respondent - The Insecticide Inspector, Attari, District Amritsar under 1 [email protected].(Crl.)No.4102 of 2020 Section

Gupta and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 29(1)(A); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397(2), 397(3) and 482

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1503; 2002(5)WLN67

of the Criminal proceedings pending in Criminal Case No. 959/96 for the offences under Sections 29(1)(A) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter called in short, 'the Act') in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Vijaynagar, Sriganganagar.2. Briefly … raised substantial questions of law. It may be pertinent and appropriate to state here that the provisions of Section 25(4) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 are admittedly identical to the provisions of Section 24(4) of the

Tarsem Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Fertilizer Control Order, 1985; Fertilizer Control Regulations - Regulation 19; Essential Commodities Act, 1950 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (1997)115PLR34

Insecticides Act, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Drugs and Cosmetics Act. Sub-section (4) of Section 24 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 has given right to a person who has notified his intention of adducing evidence in controversion of the … enactment, like Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, and Section 25(3) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. With the non-inclusion of such provisions of law in the impugned order,

Ashok Sureshchand Bal and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 16(1), 18, 18A, 19(3), 23, 23(4), 25, 25(3), 25(4) and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 179, 180, 245(2), 201 and 319; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 13(2); Insecticides Act, 1968

Reported in : (2002)1BOMLR483; 2002(1)MhLj211

In State of Haryana v. Unique Farmaid (P) Ltd. and others (supra), while dealing with the provisions of Insecticides Act, 1968, the accused within the statutory time limit had notified to the Inspector of his intention to adduce evidence … given to the petitioners in accordance with section 23 of the said Act.(3) The valuable right available under section 25(4) has been denied to the petitioners.In view of the above submissions, it is urged that the proceedings be