Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: insecticides act 1968 section 24 · Page 1 of about 159 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 03 1997

Northern Minerals Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-03-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : (1997)115PLR722

and that the other sample be sent to the Central Insecticides Laboratory for analysis under the provisions of section 24 (3) and (4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the rules framed thereunder and that they would be … 2 by the Quality Control Inspector was misbranded and why action be not taken against them under the Insecticides Act, 1968? Petitioner No. 1 gave reply Annexure P-4 to the show cause notice, requesting the Licensing Officer-cum-Deputy Director of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1992

Bharat Pulverising Mills Limited Madras Vs. the Joint Director of Agri ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-19-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 14, 19, 20, 22, 24 and 21(1); Insecticide Rules, 1971 - Rules 21, 22, 23 and 24; Insecticides Act, 1958; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 - Sections 83 and 29; Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977

Reported in : AIR1993Mad74; (1992)IIMLJ511

order, the petitioner preferred an appeal to the appellate authority, who is the Director of Agriculture, under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the appellate authority upheld the order of the original authority. Hence the petitioner is before the Court … any insecticide and send such samples for analysis to the Insecticide Analyst for test in the prescribed manner. Section 24 speaks about the report of the Insecticide Analyst. Section 24(1) of the Act is in the following terms:'(1)The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1981

Y.R.S. Rao Vs. Deputy Director of Agriculture, Karimnagar, Andhra Prad ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-30-1981

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24(3)(4)

Reported in : 1991LabIC1650; (1983)3SCC38b

A.D. Koshal and; E.S. Venkataramiah, JJ.1. We have gone through Section 24 of the Insecticides Act, 1968. We are of the view that under sub-section (3) of Section 24, the report signed by an Insecticide

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 15 2009

United Phosphorus Ltd., Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-15-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 31(1); Drugs and Cosmetics Act - Sections 25 and 25(4)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR973

analysis issued by their own laboratory. The necessary sanction was accorded as required Under Section 31(1) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, on 1.4.1998 by the Commissioner of Agriculture. The Insecticide Inspector lodged complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad … copy of the report to the person from whom the sample was taken. The relevant provision contained in Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, would make it amply clear that the report signed by the Insecticide Analyst

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2008

Northern Minerals Limited Vs. Plant Protection Officer and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-16-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 22, 24, 24(2), 24(3), 24(4), 29(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200 and 482; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 34; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2008(105)DRJ159

30/01/91 dated 19th January, 1991 filed against it under Section 200 Cr.PC read with Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, be quashed.2. The petitioner is a manufacturer of insecticides. Amongst others, it manufactures the insecticide, Malathion 50% EC. … Inspector to send the counter samples available at his end to any Central laboratory as per provisions of Section 24(2) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 read with Section 24(3) thereof. However, the Insecticide inspector did not bother to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 1980

S.M.P. Private Limited Vs. the State

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-24-1980

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24, 24(3), 24(4), 27 and 29(1)

Reported in : 1981CriLJ764

Street, Bombay, as the 1st, 2nd and 3rd accused respectively, for an offence punishable under Section 29(1)(a) ofthe Insecticides Act, 1968 (which will hereinafter be referred to as the Act). The Insecticides in question is Malstan EC 50 and … report that he intended to adduce evidence in controversion of the report as required in sub-section (3) of Section 24 of the Act. The second accused evidence in controversion of the report. The third accused who is the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2002

United Phospherus Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-15-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24, 24(4), 29 and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 258

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1681; 2002(5)WLN59

criminal original No. 478/94 dated 19th October, 94 taking cognizance against the petitioners under Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') hereinafter) and the present petitioners alongwith other accused were summoned. 2. Heard Mr. M.K. … shall be produced to the Court before which the proceedings are instituted in respect of such insecticide. 21. Section 24 of the Act deals with the report of the Insecticide Analyst. It will be profitable to reproduce the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2001

B.L. Agrawal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-10-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24 and 29; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR813]; RLW2003(3)Raj1565; 2002(4)WLN154

Merta Krishak Kraya Vikrya Sahakari Samiti, Merta City and ors. for the offence under Section 29 of the Insecticides act, 1968 (herein-after referred to as 'the Act of 1968') pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Merta … present accused petitioners by the Insecticide inspector, therefore, they have lost the valuable right give to them under Section 24 of the Act of 1968 to get the sample to be retested by the central Insecticide Laboratory and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 1996

State of Punjab Vs. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-25-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21, 22 and 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)97; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)197; 1996(4)Crimes169(SC); JT1996(10)SC480; 1996(8)SCALE224; (1996)11SCC613; [1996]Supp7SCR807

requirements envisaged under Section 22 read with Section 24(3) and (4) of the Act? Section 21 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short, the 'Act') gives power to the Insecticide Inspector to enter and search, at all reasonable times

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2001

U.S. Madan and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-05-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17(1), 21, 22(3), 22(4), 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(2), 24(3), 24(4) and 29(1); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 32A; Constitution of India - Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002CriLJ408; 2002(2)WLN243

160/83 State v. Kishan Beej Bhandar for the offence under Section 17(1)(a) punishable under Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1968') pending in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangaria … present accused petitioners by the Insecticide Inspector, therefore, they have lost the valuable right given to them under Section 24 of the Act of 1968 to get the sample to be retested by the Central Insecticide Laboratory and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial