Advanced Search Results

Rallis India Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 29(1), 33, 33(2) and 33(3); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 204, 319 and 482

Reported in : 1998CriLJ3593; 1998(3)WLC373; 1997WLC(Raj)UC682; 1998(1)WLN305

Sahkari Samiti Ltd. and Ors. and alleged therein the commission of offence punishable Under Section 29(1)(ka) of the Insecticides Act, 1968. On the basis of that complaint, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate by his order dated 22nd February '95 … Charbhujanath Kraya Vikraya Sahkari Samiti Ltd. and Ors. and alleged therein the commission of offence punishable Under Section 29(1)(ka) of the Insecticides Act, 1968. On the basis of that complaint, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate by his

Joint Director of Agriculture (inputs) Directorate of Agriculture, Che ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1996CriLJ530

upon the respondent to show cause why suitable action should not be initiated under the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968, for the manufacture of Mis-branded chemical. While acknowledging the receipt of the show-cause notice, the respondent submitted an … Rules is also said to be in excess of the rule making powers of the Central Government under section 36(2) of the Act while adverting to Sec. 9 of the Act, Rules 21, 23 and 24(2) of

U.S. Madan and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17(1), 21, 22(3), 22(4), 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(2), 24(3), 24(4) and 29(1); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 32A; Constitution of India - Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002CriLJ408; 2002(2)WLN243

160/83 State v. Kishan Beej Bhandar for the offence under Section 17(1)(a) punishable under Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1968') pending in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangaria … criminal case No. 160/83 State v. Kishan Beej Bhandar for the offence under Section 17(1)(a) punishable under Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1968') pending in the Court of

Deshmukha Enterprises and ors. Vs. Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Insecticide Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 24(3),(4) and 29(1),(2)

Reported in : ILR1997KAR2327; 1997(4)KarLJ286

ORDERM.P. Chinnappa, J.1. The brief facts leading to this petition are that the Inspector of Insecticides and Assistant Director of Agriculture, Gulbarga District, filed a complaint before the Munsiff and JMFC, III Court, Gulbarga, … 3 have committed offence by contravening Sub-clause (i) & VIII of Cause (K) of Section 3 of Insecticide Act, 1968, punishable under Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticide Act, 1968, (for short 'the Act'). Similarly, accused No. 4 also … is the dealer in the insecticide Anucros (Monocrotophos) and the accused Nos. 2 & 3 are its partners. The said insecticide was manufactured by the

Paushak Ltd. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 33(1) and 33(2)

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1879

prosecution should have been filed against the company represented by its Managing Director. (2) Section 33(1) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 says that whenever an offence under the Act has been committed by a company, every person who at

Northern Minerals Limited Vs. Plant Protection Officer and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 22, 24, 24(2), 24(3), 24(4), 29(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200 and 482; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 34; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2008(105)DRJ159

30/01/91 dated 19th January, 1991 filed against it under Section 200 Cr.PC read with Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, be quashed.2. The petitioner is a manufacturer of insecticides. Amongst others, it manufactures the insecticide, Malathion 50% EC.

Ashok Agencies Represented by Its Manager Shri Ashok Kumar S/O Sri Puk ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 3A(1), 4, 4(1), 22, 24, 39, 42B(1) and 42B(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3; Insecticides Rules, 1971; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Insecticides Act, 1963

Reported in : ILR2008KAR4299; 2008(6)AIRKarR16(DB)

judgment. Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Section 4--Liability to Tax and Rates thereof--Entry 23 of III Schedule--Insecticides Act, 1968--Section 3(e)--'Insecticide'--Definition of--Assessment of--Tax on the turn over relating to sales of mosquito repellants at 12.5% under the Karnataka … appellant herein has challenged the correctness of the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court doted 2.4.2007 passed in W.P. No. 5507/07, declining to interim with the combined reassessment and penalty orders dated 29.1.2007 (vide

Knight Queen Industries (P) Ltd. Through Its Authorised Signatory Sh. ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3A, 3A(1), 3D, 4, 21 and 21(2); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 7, 8A and 15; Uttar Pradesh Trdde Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 2000; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21 and 21(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 9(4); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act; Gujarat Sales Act, 1969; Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 6; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax (Amendment) Act; Central Excise Act; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Constitution of India - Article 136; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 19(3) and 19(4); Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Rules, 1948 - Rule 41(1) and 41(7); Customs Act; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 2; Sales Tax Law

Reported in : [2006]145STC226(All)

using chemicals for manufacturing the finished goods which have been treated as 'insecticides' under the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and photostate copies of the Certificate of Registration of the license issued under Section 9(4) of the 'Insecticide' … stage itself since all the respondents are represented by their respective Counsel as contemplated under Chapter XXII Rule 2, Second Proviso, Allahabad High Court Rules, 'Rules of the Court, 1952'. Parties have exchanged pleadings by filing counter

G.S. Prasad and ors. Vs. State Represented by the Assistant Director o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Seeds Act, 1996 - Sections 13(2), 15, 15(3), 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 19; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rule 21 and 21(3); Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 7(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)314; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)231

which are hit by the Rule, would get vitiated. The Supreme Court while interpreting Section 24 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 which is in pari materia to Rule 21 (3) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 observed:'Then in order to … it may be necessary to briefly notice the relevant facts leading to file of Crl. Petition No.4876 of 2000. The facts in other criminal petitions need not be noticed even according to the submission made by the

The Deputy Director of Agriculture, Kurnool Vs. Sondoz (India) Ltd. an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21(I) and 29(1); Insecticides Rules - Rule 24 and 24(2)

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1830

Prosecutor contended that the Court below erred in acquitting the accused. There are no specified rules under the Insecticides Act, 1968. (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) prescribing the procedure as to how the sample has to … the same was misbranded. Afterwards, the complaint was filed stating that the respondents-accused are liable for punishment under section 29(1) of the Insecticides Act. The complainant examined P.P. Ws 1 to 3 and marked Ex. S.P. 1 … A-16 was split up by the order of the court below dated 29-7-1986. A-4 to A-6, A-8 and A-12 were discharged by the order of