Advanced Search Results

Bharat Pulverising Mills Limited Madras Vs. the Joint Director of Agri ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 14, 19, 20, 22, 24 and 21(1); Insecticide Rules, 1971 - Rules 21, 22, 23 and 24; Insecticides Act, 1958; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 - Sections 83 and 29; Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977

Reported in : AIR1993Mad74; (1992)IIMLJ511

order, the petitioner preferred an appeal to the appellate authority, who is the Director of Agriculture, under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the appellate authority upheld the order of the original authority. Hence the petitioner is before the Court … in respect of its contents; or'Section 14 of the Act provides for revocation, suspension and amendment of licences. Section 19 of the Act speaks above the appointment of persons as Insecticide Analy-sists by the Central or a State

Tangudu Someswara Rao and ors. Vs. State of A.P. Rep., by Its Public P ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3K and 29; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 19

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD(Cri)626; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)352; 2002CriLJ510

prosecution was launched against the accused on the complaint filed under Section 29(i)(a) r/w Sec. 3K(i)(viii) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, and Rule 19 of the Insecticides Rules, 1971. The complainant was examined as PW-1 on 27.11.1998 and the

Joint Director of Agriculture (inputs) Directorate of Agriculture, Che ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1996CriLJ530

upon the respondent to show cause why suitable action should not be initiated under the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968, for the manufacture of Mis-branded chemical. While acknowledging the receipt of the show-cause notice, the respondent submitted an … possessing such technical and other qualification as may be prescribed to be Insecticide Inspectors for respective areas and Section 19 provides that the Government may appoint by Notification persons as it thinks fit and possessing such technical and

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules

the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases in relation to Prevention of Food … besides pointing out the changes required in these laws due to change in social order.The Seeds Act, 1966(A) Section 19 of the Seeds Act reads as under:Penalty - If any person (a) contravenes any provision of this Act

G.S. Prasad and ors. Vs. State Represented by the Assistant Director o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Seeds Act, 1996 - Sections 13(2), 15, 15(3), 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 19; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rule 21 and 21(3); Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 7(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)314; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)231

which are hit by the Rule, would get vitiated. The Supreme Court while interpreting Section 24 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 which is in pari materia to Rule 21 (3) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 observed:'Then in order to … of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings initiated against them for the offence punishable under Section 19(a) of the Seeds Act, 1996 on the file of the respective courts.3. Before adverting to the question that

Dharam Paul S/O Sh. Amar Nath Vs. the State of Punjab Thr. Insecticide ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13, 17, 18, 18(3), 29, 30(3) and 33; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 19(3); ;Insecticides Rules, 1971; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; ;Insecticides (Price, Stock Display and Submission of Reports) Order, 1986; ;Fertilizer Control Order, 1985

Reported in : 1991CriLJ120

filed against the present petitioner, and his other co-accused, under Sections 17, 18(1)(c) 3(k) and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. In brief, according to the allegations made in the impugned complaint, moved … ORDERS.S. Grewal, J.1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') relates to quashment of … J.1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') relates to quashment of complaint (Annexure

Hindustan Ciba Geigy Ltd. and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Companies Act - Sections 16, 19, 22, 24, 24(4), 29(1) 31, and 31(1); Insecticides Act, 1968; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971

Reported in : 1995CriLJ618; 1995(1)WLC124

to why proceedings for cancellation of their registration and licence be not initiated under the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') and the Insecticides Rules, 1971 (in short 'the Rules'). (iii) The petitioner-Company in its … the Central Insecticides Laboratory shall to the extent so specified be exercised by the head of that institution.10. Section 19 deals with the Insecticide Analyst. It provides that the Central Government or a State Government may, by notification

Tarsem Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Fertilizer Control Order, 1985; Fertilizer Control Regulations - Regulation 19; Essential Commodities Act, 1950 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (1997)115PLR34

Insecticides Act, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Drugs and Cosmetics Act. Sub-section (4) of Section 24 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 has given right to a person who has notified his intention of adducing evidence in controversion of the … the writ petitions and for the purpose of facts I am taking these from C.W.P. No. 5643 of 1995 (Tarsem Singh v. Union of India and Ors).2. Tarsem Singh, Sales Assistant, working in Indian Farmers Fertilizers Cooperative

Ashok Sureshchand Bal and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 16(1), 18, 18A, 19(3), 23, 23(4), 25, 25(3), 25(4) and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 179, 180, 245(2), 201 and 319; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 13(2); Insecticides Act, 1968

Reported in : (2002)1BOMLR483; 2002(1)MhLj211

In State of Haryana v. Unique Farmaid (P) Ltd. and others (supra), while dealing with the provisions of Insecticides Act, 1968, the accused within the statutory time limit had notified to the Inspector of his intention to adduce evidence … 1. The petitioners are being prosecuted for offence under section 18(a)(l) read with section 16(l)(a) punishable under section 27(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (hereinafter called … section 16(l)(a) punishable under section 27(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (hereinafter called the said Act) and the Rules thereunder on a complaint

Mehta Krishi Kendra and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Fertilizers (Control) Order, 1985 - Regulation 19 and 19(1); Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 19 and 21; Insecticides Act, 1968; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj472; 2002(1)WLN264

and Haryana High Court in the case of Tarsem Singh (Supra) held that in every enactment, for example Insecticides Act, 1968, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 there is a provision to send … is declared to the invalid, it should be declared prospectively and not retrospectively. Since in the present case Section 19 was declared violative of article 19 of the Constitution of India on 16.9.96 and sample was taken on