Advanced Search Results

Prabhakar Tulshiramji Mankar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17, 18 and 30(3); Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 10

Reported in : 2005(2)ALLMR34; 2005(2)BomCR268; 2005(1)MhLj228

of Insecticides holding licence Nos. AMT/203, AMT/283, AMT/320, AMT/336 and AMT/66 respectively issued under Section 13 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 read with Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Rules framed thereunder. On 29th August, 1990, the petitioners … Quality Control Inspector (Seeds/Fertilizers/Insecticides), Amravati, issued a show cause notice to the petitioners, under Section 17(i)(a), 17(i)(c) and 18(i)(c) of the Insecticides Act read with Rule 10 of the Insecticides Rules. 1971, calling upon the petitioners to

Swastik Pesticides and Chemicals thro' Vijaykumar Vs. the State of Guj ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Insecticide Act, 1968 - Sections 3K, 3K(1), 17, 17(1), 18, 18(1), 21, 22, 22(4), 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 29 and 33; Companies Act, 1956; Food Adulteration Act; Drugs and Cosmetics Act; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 258 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2027

5) :'3. Despite the request having been made by the petitioner as envisaged under Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (herinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Admittedly, no sample was sent to the Central Insecticide Laboratory but the … Criminal Complaint as well as prosecution instituted thereon in reference to the provisions of Section 3(K)(1), 17(1)(a) and 18(1)(c) of the Insecticide Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The petitioner-orig.accused No. 2 (hereinafter referred to

M/s Cheminova India Ltd. Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Amritsar under 1 [email protected].(Crl.)No.4102 of 2020 Section 3(k)(i), 17, 18 and 33 punishable under Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) read with Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971.3. On 10.02.2011, Insecticide

Agarwal Agencies and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 33, 18 and 29(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3426

taking cognizance against the petitioners for offence under Sections 17 and 18 read with Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 20th Jan., 1994 Insecticides Inspector Shri Mani Ram

Ajay Pratap Singh. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sction 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 478, 412, 120; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Section 18, 31

chargesheet under Sections 409, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 18 of the Insecticides Act, 1968. After submission of the chargesheet, cognizance was taken and, while the case reached to the stage of charge,

Biochem Pharmaceutical and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 18A, 22, 23, 23(4), 25 and 27; Insecticides Act, 1968; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 121(2005)DLT207; 2005(82)DRJ653

Act as well as those on the Drugs and Cosmetics Act will be relevant for the analysis. The Insecticides Act, 1968 has very similar provisions. Both Insecticides Act and the Drugs and Cosmetics Act require the sample to be … No. 1. Petitioner No. 1 is accused No. 1 in complaint case No. 01/04 of 1998 for offence Section 18(a)(i) punishable under Section 27(d) of The Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (in short the `Act'). The petitioners

D.A. Vaishnav Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3(K), 17, 18, 24, 24(3), 29, 31 and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1998CriLJ610

quashing the complaint dated 7-8-1992 (Ann. P. 2), under Sections 3(K) 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short, the 'Act') read with Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rule 1971, pending in the Court of … ORDERNanak Chand Khichi, J.1. The prayer of the petitioner in this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is for

Artee Minerals and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 8, 18, 24, 24(3), 24(4), 29 and 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(3)WLN658; 2002(3)WLN658

162/87 State v. Thakar Das Rajendra Kumar and Ors. for the offence under Section 2, 18/29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1968') pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Anoopgarh

Ajay Handa Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 3K(1), 17, 18, 18(2), 24, 27(5), 29, 31, 31(1) and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 25(5) and 27(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 155(2), 156(1) and 482

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2002

N.K. Kapoor, J.1. Petitioner seeks quashing of complaint under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short 'the Act') read with Section/Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971, (for short 'the Rules') and

Baldev Krishan and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 17, 18, 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 29 and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5)

Reported in : 1992CriLJ2444

Malout, have moved this Court for quashing complaint under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, and Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules, 1971, filed against them and the manufacturer M/s. Thakar Chemicals, New … are partners of M/s. Kisan Beej Bhandar, Gur Bazar, Malout, have moved this Court for quashing complaint under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, and Rule 27(5) of the Insecticides Rules,