Advanced Search Results
U.S. Madan and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Sep-05-2001
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17(1), 21, 22(3), 22(4), 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(2), 24(3), 24(4) and 29(1); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 32A; Constitution of India - Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482
2002CriLJ408; 2002(2)WLN243
160/83 State v. Kishan Beej Bhandar for the offence under Section 17(1)(a) punishable under Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1968') pending in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangaria
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhakar Tulshiramji Mankar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...
Mumbai
Sep-06-2004
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17, 18 and 30(3); Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 10
2005(2)ALLMR34; 2005(2)BomCR268; 2005(1)MhLj228
of Insecticides holding licence Nos. AMT/203, AMT/283, AMT/320, AMT/336 and AMT/66 respectively issued under Section 13 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 read with Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Rules framed thereunder. On 29th August, 1990, the petitioners … analysis, the District Quality Control Inspector (Seeds/Fertilizers/Insecticides), Amravati, issued a show cause notice to the petitioners, under Section 17(i)(a), 17(i)(c) and 18(i)(c) of the Insecticides Act read with Rule 10 of the Insecticides Rules. 1971, calling upon
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwastik Pesticides and Chemicals thro' Vijaykumar Vs. the State of Guj ...
Gujarat
May-13-2005
CriminalFood Adulteration
Insecticide Act, 1968 - Sections 3K, 3K(1), 17, 17(1), 18, 18(1), 21, 22, 22(4), 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 29 and 33; Companies Act, 1956; Food Adulteration Act; Drugs and Cosmetics Act; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 258 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
(2005)3GLR2027
5) :'3. Despite the request having been made by the petitioner as envisaged under Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (herinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Admittedly, no sample was sent to the Central Insecticide Laboratory but the … quashing of Criminal Complaint as well as prosecution instituted thereon in reference to the provisions of Section 3(K)(1), 17(1)(a) and 18(1)(c) of the Insecticide Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The petitioner-orig.accused No. 2 (hereinafter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Fauji Sewa Centre Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-10-2006
Civil
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17, 18, 18(1), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 29 and 33; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Criminla Procedure Code , 1974 - Sections 482
2006CriLJ1386; 2006FAJ246
the petitioners are said to have committed offences punishable under Sections 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, hereinafter referred to as the Act. Show cause notice dated 9-1-1989 Annexure P/3 was sent to M/s. Goel … and petitioner Nos. 3 to 7, distributors, dealing in the sale of insecticides and pesticides filed petition under Section 482, Cr. P.C. for quashing of the complaint An-nexure P/l dated 14-9-1990 filed by the Insecticides Inspector, Gurdaspur
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.C. Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-08-1990
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17, 18 and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 401
(1990)97PLR644
15th January, 1988. It was further submitted that the sanction for launching prosecution Under Section 31(1) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 was obtained on 3rd February, 1989, i.e. much after the prosecution bad been launched in the Court of … Grewal, J.1. This revision petitions relates to quashment of complaint Annexure P-l, filed against the petitioners Under Sections 17, 18 and 33 of the Insecticide Act, 1968 consequent proceedings taken thereunder, including the summoning order.2. In brief,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others
Supreme Court of India
May-02-1997
Environment
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 26, 27 and 36; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 39, 41 and 42; Clean Air Acts
AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)
considering the recommendations of the Expert Committee and after consultation with the Registration Committee set up under the Insecticides Act 1968 cancelled the Certificate of Registration in respect ofAaldrin, restricted the use of Dieldrin, for Locust Control in desert … is the power of the licensing officer to revoke, suspend or amend the licence issued under Section 13. Section 17 is the prohibition for import as well as manufacture of certain insecticides. Section 26 is the power of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWadhawa Beej Bhandar and ors. Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-07-1997
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 17(1), 21(1), 24(2), 29(1) and 30(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
1998CriLJ1374
prayed that complaint annexure P/1 filed under Sections 29(1)(a) read with Section 3(k)(1) and Section 17(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 be quashed qua them so as to put a-stop to the abuse of the process of Court.2. It
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharam Paul S/O Sh. Amar Nath Vs. the State of Punjab Thr. Insecticide ...
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-05-1989
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13, 17, 18, 18(3), 29, 30(3) and 33; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 19(3); ;Insecticides Rules, 1971; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; ;Insecticides (Price, Stock Display and Submission of Reports) Order, 1986; ;Fertilizer Control Order, 1985
1991CriLJ120
filed against the present petitioner, and his other co-accused, under Sections 17, 18(1)(c) 3(k) and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. In brief, according to the allegations made in the impugned complaint, moved … whereas, the accused connected with the manufacture of the said pesticide are alleged to have committed offence under Section 17 of the Act, for manufacturing misbranded pesticide, and, are liable for penal action under Section 33 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Sep-21-1999
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17(1), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 29(1)A; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 25
2000CriLJ2623
for dropping the proceedings against him pending in his Court under Section 17(1)A r/w Section 29(1)A of the Insecticides Act, 1968.2. Mr. Bhansali, learned counsel for the petitioner, pointing out that the petitioner has been denied the right
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaishree Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Mar-10-1998
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17(1), 18(1), 22(6), 23(3), 24(4) and 29; Insecticides Rules
1998CriLJ1865
Magistrate has taken cognizance of offences punishable under Sections 17(1)(a) and 18(1)(c) read with Section 29 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short 'the Act').2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the petitioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »