Advanced Search Results

Hindustan Ciba Geigy Ltd. and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Companies Act - Sections 16, 19, 22, 24, 24(4), 29(1) 31, and 31(1); Insecticides Act, 1968; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971

Reported in : 1995CriLJ618; 1995(1)WLC124

to why proceedings for cancellation of their registration and licence be not initiated under the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') and the Insecticides Rules, 1971 (in short 'the Rules'). (iii) The petitioner-Company in its … made at the Bar.9. Now a brief resume of the relevant provisions of the Act and the Rules. Section 16 of the Act lays down that the Central Govt. may, by notification in the official gazette, establish a

G.S. Prasad and ors. Vs. State Represented by the Assistant Director o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Seeds Act, 1996 - Sections 13(2), 15, 15(3), 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 19; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rule 21 and 21(3); Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 7(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)314; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)231

which are hit by the Rule, would get vitiated. The Supreme Court while interpreting Section 24 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 which is in pari materia to Rule 21 (3) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 observed:'Then in order to … case any legal proceedings are taken or for analysis by the Central Seed Laboratory under sub-section (2) of Section 16, as the case may be. (3) If the person from whom the samples have been taken refuses to

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules

the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases in relation to Prevention of Food … deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.(C) Section 16 of the Seeds Act reads thus:Report of Seed Analyst. (1) The Seed Analyst shall, as soon as may

Gupta Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 24 and 29; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)571; JT2002(Suppl1)SC516; 2002(5)WLN776

being sold. He collected samples of the materials for examination. In accordance with the procedure . prescribed under Insecticides Act, 1968, the sample was divided into different parts of which one was given to the person from whom the … 1.5.2001, declining to interfere with the criminal proceeding instituted against the appellant in exercise of the power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is under challenge.4. The factual backdrop of the case which is relevant … was sent to the dealer on 10.1.1992 and to the appellants on 16.1.1992. On receipt of the intimation about the state analyst report the appellants

Murli Manohar Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 9, 17, 18, 21, 29, 33 and 33(1); Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 16 and 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82 and 83; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1295

CrPC, for quashing the criminal complaint under Sections 3k(i), 9, 17, 18, 21(b), 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Rules 16 and 19 of the Insecticides Rules, 1971 (hereinafter … V.M. Jain, J.1. This is a petition under Section 482, CrPC, for quashing the criminal complaint under Sections 3k(i), 9, 17, 18, 21(b), 29 and 33 of

indofil Chemicals Company, Bombay and Others Vs. Kunwarsingh Madhaosin ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 198, 199, 466, 468(2), 469 and 469(1)

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1234

the Court below against the Petitioners alleging offence under Section 29(1)(b) and Section 9(1)(3) and Section 17(1)(c) of Insecticides Act, 1968. The allegation in the complaint is that the accused No. 1 is a company and accused Nos. 2 … 1 is a company and accused Nos. 2 to 14 are its Directors and Accused Nos. 15 and 16 are the officers of the Company. The company deals in insecticides. A company or a person engaged in

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Food Inspector and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Food Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1A), 4, 8, 13, 13(2), 16, 17, 17(1) and 23(1A); Insecticides Act, 1968; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 and 141; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 205, 218 and 482; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 65, 65(1) and 65(2)

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2224; 2009(1)KLJ665

For the purpose of this rule:(a) the expressions 'insecticide' shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Insecticides Act, 1968 (46 of 1968);(b) unless otherwise stated:(i) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(ii) all foods refer to raw agriculturalproducts moving in commerce.(3)xxxxxxxxxxxxxx(emphasis supplied - … of the Act there is no provision for nomination of a functionary. The nature of the offence under Section 16 and 17 of the Act are totally different. Non-payment of amounts to a specified payee or holder in

Hyderabad Beverages Private Limited Etc. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(11), 8, 9A, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2A), 13(2B), 13(D), 13(2E), 13(2), 13(3), 13(5), 13(11), 15, 16, 16(1), 21(3) and 114; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7, 19, 16(2), 14(1) and 15(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21(1), 22, 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 30(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 2000; Central Insecticides Laboratory - Sections 24, 24(3) and 24(4); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 15(3), 15(4), 25, 25(3) and 25(4); Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 26, 33B and 33O; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 18A; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921; Tenants Act - Sections 3 and 9; Indian Penal Co

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3988

under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, (hereinafter referred to as PFA Act), the Seeds Act and the Insecticides Act. It is therefore convenient to refer to the relevant statutory provisions, the rules and the judgments under each … or part thereof taken for analysis.30. Rule 21 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 prescribes the duties of a Seed Analyst and reads as under:On receipt … Food Adulteration Act 1954 and Rule 50 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, liable for punishment under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954. Petitioners would contend that the Mineral Water was packed in

Ashok Sureshchand Bal and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 16(1), 18, 18A, 19(3), 23, 23(4), 25, 25(3), 25(4) and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 179, 180, 245(2), 201 and 319; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 13(2); Insecticides Act, 1968

Reported in : (2002)1BOMLR483; 2002(1)MhLj211

In State of Haryana v. Unique Farmaid (P) Ltd. and others (supra), while dealing with the provisions of Insecticides Act, 1968, the accused within the statutory time limit had notified to the Inspector of his intention to adduce evidence … 1. The petitioners are being prosecuted for offence under section 18(a)(l) read with section 16(l)(a) punishable under section 27(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (hereinafter called

Shri.M.K.Dhanuka, and anr. Vs.Government of India Rep. by Dr.Suresh Ch ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 482

1971 seeking prosecution of the petitioners and other accused for the alleged violation of Section 3(K)(i) of the Insecticides Act 1968. As per the complaint, the insecticide Inspector, who has been notified under Section 20 of the Insecticides Act … was subjected to chemical analysis at Central Insecticides Laboratory (CIL), Faridabad and as per the analysis report dated 16.9.2005, the active ingredient found to be 69.02% as against 75% which is also not conforming the relevant specification