Advanced Search Results
Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...
Mumbai
Jun-21-2010
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules
the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases in relation to Prevention of Food … Seed Analyst shall, as soon as may be after the receipt of the sample under Sub-section (2) of Section 15, analyse the sample at the State Seed Laboratory and deliver, in such form as may be prescribed, one
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKissan Brothers Faridkot Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-25-2000
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 15, 17, 18. 29, 30(3) and 33; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5)
2001CriLJ234
Inspite of this, the sample was declared misbranded. The petitioner filed an appeal under Section 15 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The Joint Director (Plant protection), Punjab, Chandigarh, vide his order dated 10-5-1999,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.S. Prasad and ors. Vs. State Represented by the Assistant Director o ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-19-2001
CriminalFood Adulteration
Seeds Act, 1996 - Sections 13(2), 15, 15(3), 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 19; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rule 21 and 21(3); Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 7(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482
2002(1)ALD(Cri)314; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)231
which are hit by the Rule, would get vitiated. The Supreme Court while interpreting Section 24 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 which is in pari materia to Rule 21 (3) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 observed:'Then in order to … Rule 21 (3) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 as amended by the Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973 read with Section 15(2) of the Seeds Act, the Seed Analyst is bound to deliver a copy of his report of analysis
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Knight Queen Industries (P) Ltd. Through Its Authorised Signatory Sh. ...
Allahabad
Nov-25-2005
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3A, 3A(1), 3D, 4, 21 and 21(2); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 7, 8A and 15; Uttar Pradesh Trdde Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 2000; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21 and 21(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 9(4); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act; Gujarat Sales Act, 1969; Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 6; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax (Amendment) Act; Central Excise Act; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Constitution of India - Article 136; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 19(3) and 19(4); Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Rules, 1948 - Rule 41(1) and 41(7); Customs Act; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 2; Sales Tax Law
[2006]145STC226(All)
using chemicals for manufacturing the finished goods which have been treated as 'insecticides' under the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and photostate copies of the Certificate of Registration of the license issued under Section 9(4) of the 'Insecticide' … at the point of sale to the consumer at the maximum rate for the time being specified in Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 or where the State Government, by notification declares any other single
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNorthern Minerals Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-03-1997
Criminal
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482
(1997)115PLR722
2 by the Quality Control Inspector was misbranded and why action be not taken against them under the Insecticides Act, 1968? Petitioner No. 1 gave reply Annexure P-4 to the show cause notice, requesting the Licensing Officer-cum-Deputy Director of … and that the other sample be sent to the Central Insecticides Laboratory for analysis under the provisions of section 24 (3) and (4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the rules framed thereunder and that they would … expired on February, 1992. Petitioner No. 2 was served on or about 15.7.1992 while petitioner No. 1 was served on or about 15.6.1996. No useful
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindofil Chemicals Company, Bombay and Others Vs. Kunwarsingh Madhaosin ...
Mumbai
Dec-07-1995
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 198, 199, 466, 468(2), 469 and 469(1)
1996CriLJ1234
the Court below against the Petitioners alleging offence under Section 29(1)(b) and Section 9(1)(3) and Section 17(1)(c) of Insecticides Act, 1968. The allegation in the complaint is that the accused No. 1 is a company and accused Nos. 2 … Procedure and under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for quashing the proceeding in Criminal Case No. 15310 of 1989 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, II Court. Thane, Heard both the sides.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Punjab Through Secretary Agriculture, Punjab Govt. and an ...
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-28-1990
CivilCommercial
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 14 and 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115
(1990)97PLR696
for analysis to the Central insecticides Laboratory, Faridabad.2. Having been granted a licence for the purpose under the Insecticides Act 1968 (herein referred to as 'the Act'), the plaintiffs are dealing in the storage and sale of Insecticides and … Licensing Officer is empowered to revoke the licence granted and any person aggrieved by such order may under Section 15, appeal against it to the appellate authority The Act, at the same time provides by Section 29 thereof
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Central Excise Vs. Essen Synthetics (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Aug-18-1987
Excise
(1987)(14)ECC169
order dated 14-7-1983, inter alia, held that insecticides had the same meaning as defined in Section 3 of Insecticides Act, -1968. The Schedule annexed to the Insecticides Act, 1968 did not include the two products DBP and DMP as … included to the Schedule of Insecticides Act. Reference was also made to Ministry of Defence specification issued on 15-7-1966 about D.B.P.and D.M.P. and a similar letter issued by the same authority on 23-7-1975. Reference during arguments was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others
Supreme Court of India
May-02-1997
Environment
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 26, 27 and 36; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 39, 41 and 42; Clean Air Acts
AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)
considering the recommendations of the Expert Committee and after consultation with the Registration Committee set up under the Insecticides Act 1968 cancelled the Certificate of Registration in respect ofAaldrin, restricted the use of Dieldrin, for Locust Control in desert … Cases, the Notification dated 1.1.1996 of the Central Government issued in exercise of powers under Sub-section (2) of Section 27 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 phasing out progressively the manufacture and use of Benzene Hexachloride and directing … other countries. To the said additional affidavit also annexed a Notification dated 15th May, 1990 of the Ministry of Agriculture which Notification indicates that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Palverising Mills Ltd. Vs. Collr. of Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Sep-03-1996
Customs
(1997)(93)ELT628Tri(Mum.)bai
clearance thereof under OGL. They initially filed Into Bond Bill of Entry. The item imported was covered under Insecticides Act, 1968. The appellants were holding Registration Certificate issued under Section 9 of the said Act. The said Certificates however … under Insecticides Act, 1968, were not permitted to be imported in terms of Sr. No. 1 of Part 156E of the Import Policy 1992-97, and because the Certificates of Registration produced was not acceptable, as it did
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »