Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: insecticides act 1968 section 11 · Page 1 of about 203 results (0.033 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 02 1997

Dr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-1997

Subject : Environment

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 26, 27 and 36; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 39, 41 and 42; Clean Air Acts

Reported in : AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)

considering the recommendations of the Expert Committee and after consultation with the Registration Committee set up under the Insecticides Act 1968 cancelled the Certificate of Registration in respect ofAaldrin, restricted the use of Dieldrin, for Locust Control in desert … 10 provides for an appeal against the decision of the Registration Committee to the Central Government against non-registration. Section 11 is the suo moto power of the Central Government in exercise of which power the Government can call

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2010

Shri.M.K.Dhanuka, and anr. Vs.Government of India Rep. by Dr.Suresh Ch ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-13-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 482

1971 seeking prosecution of the petitioners and other accused for the alleged violation of Section 3(K)(i) of the Insecticides Act 1968. As per the complaint, the insecticide Inspector, who has been notified under Section 20 of the Insecticides Act … to correct the defect in terms of judgment of Hon'ble the Apex Court reported in AIR 1988 SC 1128(U.P. Pollution Control Board V. Modi Textiles and others), it would not be possible to do so in view

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2012

Godrej Agrovet Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Oct-25-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

JMFC Badnapur. The case is filed by respondent no.2, public servant for offences punishable under various Sections of Insecticides Act, 1968 and Rules framed under the Act. Both sides are heard. 2] Copy of the complaint given by public … Oral Order: 1] The petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing and setting aside the proceeding of S.T.C.No.162/08, which is pending in the Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 25 1995

Joint Director of Agriculture (inputs) Directorate of Agriculture, Che ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-25-1995

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1996CriLJ530

upon the respondent to show cause why suitable action should not be initiated under the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968, for the manufacture of Mis-branded chemical. While acknowledging the receipt of the show-cause notice, the respondent submitted an … in Section 3(k) of the Act, which define the word 'mis branded'. 11. The learned counsel for the respondents placed very strong reliance upon the … Rules is also said to be in excess of the rule making powers of the Central Government under section 36(2) of the Act while adverting to Sec. 9 of the Act, Rules 21, 23 and 24(2) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1996

Tarsem Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-16-1996

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Fertilizer Control Order, 1985; Fertilizer Control Regulations - Regulation 19; Essential Commodities Act, 1950 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (1997)115PLR34

Insecticides Act, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Drugs and Cosmetics Act. Sub-section (4) of Section 24 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 has given right to a person who has notified his intention of adducing evidence in controversion of the … under which a person may be deprived of his life or liberty should be 'reasonable, fair and just'.' 11. In order to determine the first point formulated by the Court above, it is also necessary for me

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 2(36), 32, 32(1) and 47; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 17; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Cantonments Act, 2006; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Off-shore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 31; Patents Act, 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957; Trade Marks Act 1999; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

2006 is mandatory. To manufacture, sale and distribution of insecticides, licence is mandatory under Section 13 of the Insecticides Act, 1968. To explore minerals, licence is necessary under the Off-shore Areas Mineral (Development & Regulation) Act, 2002. To manufacture, … of trade, business, profession, etc. various legislations have been enacted with provisions relating to licensing. For example, under Section 11 of the Industries (Development & Regulation) Act, 1951, licence is mandatory for establishing any of the industries enumerated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2020

Union of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

PROVISIONS SIMILAR TO SECTION221)(d) OF THE ACT112 We may notice that the Seeds Act, 1966 (Section 14(1)(e), the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Section 21(f)), the Kerala Fish Seed Act, 2014 (Section 19(1)(e), Uttarakhand 143 Ground Water (Regulation and Control of Development … - (a) evasion or attempted evasion of duty exceeding fifty lakh rupees; or (b) prohibited goods notified under section 11 which are also notified under sub-clause (C) of clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 135; or (c)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1987

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Essen Synthetics (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-18-1987

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1987)(14)ECC169

order dated 14-7-1983, inter alia, held that insecticides had the same meaning as defined in Section 3 of Insecticides Act, -1968. The Schedule annexed to the Insecticides Act, 1968 did not include the two products DBP and DMP as … of the Insecticides Act. He also referred to Dte. General of Supplies 5c Disposals, New Delhi's letter dated 11-5-1982 which would suggest that the product D.VI.P. is an insecticides. He also referred to Dte. of Plant Protection

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2008

Northern Minerals Limited Vs. Plant Protection Officer and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-16-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 22, 24, 24(2), 24(3), 24(4), 29(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200 and 482; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 34; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2008(105)DRJ159

30/01/91 dated 19th January, 1991 filed against it under Section 200 Cr.PC read with Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, be quashed.2. The petitioner is a manufacturer of insecticides. Amongst others, it manufactures the insecticide, Malathion 50% EC. … summoned the accused, including the petitioner herein, who was arrayed as accused No. 3 in that complaint, for 11th March, 1991. On 11th March, 1991 itself, an application under Section 24(4) of the Insecticides Act was filed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2005

Swastik Pesticides and Chemicals thro' Vijaykumar Vs. the State of Guj ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-13-2005

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Insecticide Act, 1968 - Sections 3K, 3K(1), 17, 17(1), 18, 18(1), 21, 22, 22(4), 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 29 and 33; Companies Act, 1956; Food Adulteration Act; Drugs and Cosmetics Act; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 27(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 258 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2027

5) :'3. Despite the request having been made by the petitioner as envisaged under Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (herinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Admittedly, no sample was sent to the Central Insecticide Laboratory but the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial