Advanced Search Results

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

service providers had exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT DECLARING THAT SECTION 79(3)(b) OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (IT ACT) DOES NOT CONFER AUTHORITY TO ISSUE INFORMATION BLOCKING ORDERS UNDER

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000,

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000,

A.NITHIN KUMAR Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

2023, 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002, 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendement) Act, 2008. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the … in Crime No.8 of 2025, was registered for the offences under Sections 79 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of … The Inspector Police, CCD-1, Cyber Crime Police station, Chennai-South.2. R.Varshini ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in Crime No.08 of 2025,

Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

enunciated thereunder. This court is conscious that a significant amendment to this provision took place in 2008; the Information Technology Amendment Act was brought into force on 5 February, 2009. However, that amendment brought in greater clarity to the nature … under the Act; surely this was not the intention of the legislation as the entire reason for enacting Section 79 of the IT Act was to shield intermediaries from liability invited by primary infringers as long as the

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … clearly disclose commission of several cognizable offences inter alia under Sections 75, 79, 356 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ("BNS") and Sections 67 and

Sasidharan M.G. vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

It is submitted that in exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (1) of section 70B of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. 2008, effective from 27 10.2009, appointed the Respondent No.5 Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (hereinafter CERT In) to serve … MeitY. This legal process is mandatory to be followed in blocking any websites/ URLs.3.22 It is submitted that section 79 of the Information TechnologyAct, 2000 relates to exemption of intermediaries The said provision mandates due diligence to be

M.Inderjith Vs Commissioner of Police

Court : Chennai

of 2024 for the offences under sections 420, 465, 467, 468 of IPC and section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and as there was no progress in the investigation, he has filed the present petition. 2.It is the … of Police Cyber Crime Cell, 3.The State represented by The Inspector of Police Greater Chennai Police, (Crime No. 79 of 2024) Respondents PRAYER This criminal original petition is preferred under section 528 of BNSS 2023 seeking to

Arti Meenakshi Muthiah vs the Commissioner of Police

Court : Chennai

be registered for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420 IPC and Sections 66, 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. Immediately, the 1st respondent Police have sent a notice to the 3 rd respondent Bank, based on which, … Police immediately and an FIR in Crime No.109 of 2020 came to be registered for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420 IPC and Sections 66, 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. Immediately, the

Shayeed @ Syed Kkaffar Vs The State, represented by The Inspector of P ...

Court : Chennai

hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 66E, 67, 67(A) of Information Technology Act (Amendment Act), 2008 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 351(4) of BNS Act, in Crime No.381 of 2025 on the file … Police, Vedaranyam Police Station, Nagapattinam District. (Crime No.381 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event