Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … statute ............................................................................ 63 B. Interpretation of Section 2(15), the definition clause ............................................................................... 70 Summation of interpretation of Section 2(15) ............................................................................................... 85 C. Sections 10, 11,

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

off and implementation of the Aadhaar scheme.7) On March 03, 2006, approval was given by the Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India for the project titled ‘Unique Identification for BPL Families’ … inalienable rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Second Amendment to the US Constitution refers inter alia to security of person, while … from time to time.32) Chapter III deals with ‘authentication’, which has generated the maximum debate in these proceedings. Section 7 falling under this Chapter mandates that proof of Aadhaar number would be necessary for receipt of certain subsidies, … have challenged the Aadhaar project which took off by way of administrative action in the year 2009. Even after Aadhaar got a shield of statutory

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shubhash Traders,

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(MP)372

that period. Sub-section (3) was added to Section 8 of the Act by the West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1972 w.e.f. 15th Feb., 1971. Prior to 15th Feb., 1971, an application under Section 8 was required to … in CIT v. Grasim Industries Ltd. IT Appeal (L) No. 3592 of 2008. [reported at (2009) 225 CTR (Bom) 127: Ed.] The learned Counsel has … In that context, it has been held as follows:8. There is yet another good reason for insisting that right of preemption must be exercised within the period specified under Section 8 of the Act so that the … and Anr. : (2009) 223 CTR (SC) 225 : (2009) 5 SCC 791. Mr. Alok Aradhe, learned senior counsel and Mr. Sumit Nema, learned Counsel

Anilkumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the PoCSO Act’), and Section 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.4. Annexure-A2 is the statement of … of 376 and 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code 1860, and Section 6 r/w 5(l) and 8 r/w 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the PoCSO Act’), and Section 66E

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … in Crl.P. No.4676/2020 are the directors of the Petitioner in Crl.P.No.4712/2020. They have been Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 7 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 arraigned as accused Nos.3 and 4 in the Complaint. Snapdeal’s relationship with Seller

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … in Crl.P. No.4676/2020 are the directors of the Petitioner in Crl.P.No.4712/2020. They have been Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 7 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 arraigned as accused Nos.3 and 4 in the Complaint. Snapdeal’s relationship with Seller

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … For all these reasons, it was alleged that they have committed the offences punishable under the aforementioned provisions. 7 In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has alleged that he is a spirited individual working for the betterment

Dominic Thomas vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

First Class Magistrate charging the petitioner under Section 65, 43 read with Section 66 of the Information Technology(Amendment) Act, 2008. True copies of Mahazar and seizure list prepared by the Circle Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime, Thiruvananthapuram are … 001. 6 MR.ANTONY DIRECTOR, RIBBONI CONVERGENCE TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PVT.LTD.,MARY MAJOR MUNDAKKAL WEST, KOLLAM - 691 001. 7 MRS.DELSY ANTONY DIRECTOR, RIBBONI CONVERGENCE TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH ANDWP(C) NO. 6759 OF 2012 -2- DEVELOPMENT PVT.LTD., MARY MAJOR MUNDAKKAL

S.Bharath Kumar Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

in Crime No. 9 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 IPC and 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 has filed this quash petition.2. The de facto complainant/the Senior AdministrativeOfficer of 2nd respondent Institution lodged a complaint … Mr. Gopakumar, ICMR-NIRT, No.1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in connection with Crime No. 9 of 2025 on the

A.a Abdulla vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

offences involved are punishable under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. The prosecution allegation in short is as follows:The petitioner received a telephone call on 20.07.2024 from an … OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(CRL.) NO. 1376 OF 2024 PETITIONER: A.A ABDULLA AGED 75 YEARS S/O ABDUL MAJEED, FLAT NO.