Advanced Search Results

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

children over the internet.145. The aforesaid was due to the fact that, the IT Act prior to the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (for short, the ‘2008 Amendment Act’), criminalized only one act being the publication or transmission of obscene material, … provision that criminalizes the publication or transmission of “obscene material” in any electronic form and constitutes an offence. Section 67A of the IT Act, is a more aggravated offence, prescribing enhanced punishment than the preceding provision. It does

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … an offence, it has specifically said so. In that behalf, our attention is invited to Sections 66E, 67, 67A and 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000. For these reasons, it is submitted that the complaint does

Anilkumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the PoCSO Act’), and Section 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.4. Annexure-A2 is the statement of

ABIMANYU Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

under Sections 296(b), 75, 77, 78 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. Challenging the same, the petitioner has come up with this petition.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that … Inspector of Police, Mailam Police Station, Viluppuram District. Crime No.695 of 2024.2. Sivaranjini ...RespondentsCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to call for the records pertaining to the case in Crime No.695 of 2024

Manish Kumar. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act - Sections 53, 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376, 354, 306, 509, 511 Read With Section 120B; Information and Technology (Amendment) Act - Sections 66A, 66B, 67A, 67B, 72

120B of the Indian Penal Code as also under Sections 66A/66B/67A/67B and 72 of the the Information and Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. Learned Counsel Mr. Nilesh Kumar submitted that no specific allegation was attributed against the petitioner Manish Kumar … 1. The instant Criminal Revision has been preferred under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the order impugned dated 14.01.2011

Mrs. Kavitha Mahesh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commissi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2011(2)KCCR1662

to the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the further amendment to this Act by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.Consequential amendments brought about in the Indian Evidence Act by Act 21 of 2000 and Act 10/2009 are … of the evidence Act, namely in Sections 22A, 45A, 47A, 65A, 65B, 67A, 73A, 81A, 85A, 85B, 85C, 88A, 90A, 131A and more by way … (This Election Petition is filed under Section 81 of the representation of people act, 1951, praying to declare the election of the 5th respondent to

Sharat Babu Digumarti Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

offences punishable under Sections 292 and 294 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, “the IT Act”) against all of them. Avnish Bajaj filed Criminal Misc. Case No.3066 … which may extend to five years and also with fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees.” 24. Section 67A stipulates punishment for publishing or transmitting of material containing sexually explicit act, etc., in electronic form. Section 67B … the said provision. After the pronouncement by the Constitution Bench, the legislature amended Section 292 which presently reads thus:- “292. Sale, etc., of obscene books,

Anu Shanthi vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

even after the introductionof the Information Technology Act, 2000, there was no amendment to Section 293 Cr.P.C. It cannot be disputed that PW42, Assistant Director … and rigorous imprisonment for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for … committal and production of the accused persons beforethe Sessions Court, charge was framed under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act and Sections 120B, 109, 115, 449, 302, 307, 380, 511/201 and 34 IPC and when the charge

Nino Mathew vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

even after the introductionof the Information Technology Act, 2000, there was no amendment to Section 293 Cr.P.C. It cannot be disputed that PW42, Assistant Director … and rigorous imprisonment for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for … committal and production of the accused persons beforethe Sessions Court, charge was framed under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act and Sections 120B, 109, 115, 449, 302, 307, 380, 511/201 and 34 IPC and when the charge

State of Kerala vs Nino Mathew

Court : Kerala

even after the introductionof the Information Technology Act, 2000, there was no amendment to Section 293 Cr.P.C. It cannot be disputed that PW42, Assistant Director … and rigorous imprisonment for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for … committal and production of the accused persons beforethe Sessions Court, charge was framed under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act and Sections 120B, 109, 115, 449, 302, 307, 380, 511/201 and 34 IPC and when the charge