Advanced Search Results

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

children over the internet.145. The aforesaid was due to the fact that, the IT Act prior to the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (for short, the ‘2008 Amendment Act’), criminalized only one act being the publication or transmission of obscene material, … provision that criminalizes the publication or transmission of “obscene material” in any electronic form and constitutes an offence. Section 67A of the IT Act, is a more aggravated offence, prescribing enhanced punishment than the preceding provision. It does

Sri Gourav Pathak vs the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Karnataka

and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 69 of BNS, 2023 and Section 67a of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008.3. The complainant allegations are, that thecomplainant is a resident of Indirapuram, Ghaziabad District, UP, residing with her

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … 356 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ("BNS") and Sections 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 ("IT Act")4. Therefore, we request your … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short).

G.Surendhar Vs The State Rep by its, The Deputy Superintendent of Poli ...

Court : Chennai

and remanded to judicial custody on04.03.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 66E, 67 & 67A of the Information Technology Act 2008 and Section 4 of the Tamil nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women (Amendment) Act, 2002 subsequently

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … an offence, it has specifically said so. In that behalf, our attention is invited to Sections 66E, 67, 67A and 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000. For these reasons, it is submitted that the complaint does

Anilkumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the PoCSO Act’), and Section 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.4. Annexure-A2 is the statement of

ABIMANYU Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

under Sections 296(b), 75, 77, 78 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. Challenging the same, the petitioner has come up with this petition.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that … Inspector of Police, Mailam Police Station, Viluppuram District. Crime No.695 of 2024.2. Sivaranjini ...RespondentsCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to call for the records pertaining to the case in Crime No.695 of 2024

Martin Antony vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

offences under Sec.120B, 201, 212, 342, 366, 376D & 506 IPC and under Secs.66E & 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. This is the eleventh application for regular bail filed by the petitioner/accused. The learned Prosecutor would submit that … FOLLOWING:ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.Dated this the 05th day of March, 2019ORDERIt is an application for regular bail filed under Sec.439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1975 by the 2nd accused in Sessions Case SC No.118/2018 on the

Ashok Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, CCW Tenkasi

Court : Chennai

the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 75(3), 77, 78, 79 of BNS and Section 66E, 67, 67A of Information Technology Amendment Act, 2008 and Section 4 of TNPWH Act, in Crime No.08 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police,

Martin Antony vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

366, 376(D) & 506(i) r.w.s 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Secs.66E & 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. Already, this is the 13 th regular bail application filed by the petitioner in this case. Already this … No.297/2017] =========================== Dated this the 28th day of June, 2021ORDERThis is an application for regular bail filed under Sec.439 of the Cr.P.C by accused No.2 in sessions case, S.C.No.118/2018 now on the file of the 3rd Additional