Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology amendment act 2008 section 66a · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.047 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 03 2026

Smriti Achuthan vs the State Represented by

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-03-2026

to have committed offences punishable under Sections 408 and 420 of the IPC and Section 66A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. .. A-5 Smriti Achuthan, joined Pace Automation, an executive assistant to the Chairman and CEO, on 01.06.2009. She

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2024

Anilkumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-30-2024

376 and 376(2)(n) of IPC, Sec.6 r/w 5(1) and 8 r/w 7 of the POCSO Act and Sec. 66A and 67E of The Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.11. In the above situation, the conclusion to be drawn … Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the PoCSO Act’), and Section 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.4. Annexure-A2 is the statement of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2025

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-24-2025

service providers had exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner - thejudgment in the case of SHREYA SINGHAL.SHREYA SINGHAL: 12.10. Section 66A, 69A and 70 of the IT Act became the fulcrum of challenge before the Apex Court in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 06 2013

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2013

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … Cyber Crime Cell, Crime Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2011

Manish Kumar. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-31-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act - Sections 53, 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376, 354, 306, 509, 511 Read With Section 120B; Information and Technology (Amendment) Act - Sections 66A, 66B, 67A, 67B, 72

120B of the Indian Penal Code as also under Sections 66A/66B/67A/67B and 72 of the the Information and Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. Learned Counsel Mr. Nilesh Kumar submitted that no specific allegation was attributed against the petitioner Manish Kumar … 1. The instant Criminal Revision has been preferred under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the order impugned dated 14.01.2011

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2014

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-2014

Subject : Service Tax

period i.e. November 2008 to 27.2.2010, the Services provided by the Appellants fall under the taxable service of ‘Information Technology Software Service (hereinafter referred to as “ITSS”) vide clause “zzzze” of sub section (105) of Section 65 of … i.e. for the period post 27.02.2010 and held that after the said amendment in the Export Rules, the Onsite Services provided by the Appellants would … held not satisfied, (i.e. Service provided from India), then Appellants are not liable to pay service tax under Section 66A on the amount charged by subsidiaries to Appellants for onsite work and hence is liable to be refunded … are referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2014

Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan Vs. U.O.i. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-12-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

505(2) | |2. |The Representation of People Act, |Sections 8, 123 | | |1951 |(3A), 125 | |3. |Information Technology Act, 2000 &|Sections 66A, 69, | | |Information Technology |69A | | |(Intermediaries guidelines) Rules,|Rule 3(2)(b), Rule | … guidelines to promote communal harmony to the States and Union Territories in 2008 which provides inter-alia that strict action should be taken against anyone inflaming … issues including whether the existing provisions (Constitutional or Statutory) relating to disqualification to contest elections need to be amended?. The Law Commission had earlier in its 1998 recommendations emphasised on the need to strengthen the provision relating … of power vested inter-alia under Article 324 of the Constitution read with Sections 29A(5), 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2019

Shubham Bansal vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-04-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

no.2/complainant filed an application before the police about the commission of an offence under section 66A of the Information & Technology Act (hereinafter referred to as the IT Act). Though the investigation was continuing but was not … 509 IPC consisted of the maximum punishment to one year before the amendment, therefore, finding the challan has not been filed within one year from … “8. Counsel would first refer to Mander Singh and others versus Ladi 2008 (4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 388. The Court while dealing with Section 253 Cr.P.C. … No.138/2016 and restore order dated CRL.M.C.2024/2018 Page 1 of 16 26.02.2016 passed by learned CMM whereby proceedings under Section 66A, IT Act and Section 509 IPC against the petitioner has been dropped.3. The brief facts of the case

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2020

The Karassery Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-29-2020

as may be prescribed and the applicant shall furnish to him such information about the society as he may require. As per sub- section (2) … fundamental right. The petitioner Society represented by its Chief Executive, does not represent its members. The 97th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2011, inserting Part IXB containing Articles 243ZH to 243ZT, is declared as ultra vires the Constitution of … is divided into two or more societies in accordance with the provisions of Section 14.W.P.(C)No.38305 of 2016 2422. Section 66A of the KCS Act deals with powers ofRegistrar to give directions. As per Section 66A, inserted by the … State Policy of the Constitution of India, and to promote scientific and technological development, health care, market intervention and management excellence in the co-operative sector

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla Vs. Greenworld Corporation, Parwano ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 3(1A), 12AA, 19(1), 27, 31, 31(3), 31(4), 33, 33A, 33B, 33(2), 34, 34(1), 34(3), 64(4), 66, 66A, 80G(5), 80HHC(3), 80IA, 80IB, 115VZC(1), 116, 117, 118, 119, 119(1), 119(2), 120, 120(1), 124, 127, 127(1), 127(2), 127(4), 131 to 136, 142(1), 143, 143(1), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 147(1), 148, 149, 150, 150(1), 150(2), 150(3), 153, 153(2), 153(3), 154, 158BC, 234(B), 234(C), 250, 253, 253(1), 260A, 263, 263(1), 271, 271(1), 271A and 272A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 21 and 21(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136 and 142

Reported in : (2009)224CTR(SC)113; [2009]314ITR81(SC); JT2009(8)SC429; 2009(7)SCALE721; (2009)7SCC69; [2009]181TAXMAN111(SC)

copy of account of the creditors has been produced, which is placed on record. Keeping in view the information supplied by the assessee and facts on file, the income returned by the assessee is hereby accepted.In the … the proviso to Section 80HHC(3). It is true that vide the 2005 amendment the law has been clarified with retrospective effect by insertion of the … or direction contained in an order under Section 31, Section 33, Section 33A, Section 33B, Section 66 or Section 66A. Prima facie this proviso lifts the ban of limitation imposed by the other provisions of the section in … of the assessee in terms of Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as, 'the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial