Advanced Search Results

Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

enunciated thereunder. This court is conscious that a significant amendment to this provision took place in 2008; the Information Technology Amendment Act was brought into force on 5 February, 2009. However, that amendment brought in greater clarity to the nature … 21.06.2012 took note of the challenges faced by intermediaries despite following due diligence procedures. Reference is made to Section 52(1)(b), which provides absolute immunity to intermediaries, who are the backbone of the Internet, i.e. whose functions are core

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

service providers had exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … media, that every now and then, crop up on every issue. He would contend that the petitioner, an 521 US 844 (1997) intermediary, has a safe harbour under Section 79. The other provisions of Section 79 i.e.,

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … WeChat 50. Sweet Selfie21. UC News 51. Baidu Translate 22 QQ Mail 52. Vmate23. Weibo 53. QQ International24. Xender 54. QQ Security Center25. QQ Music

Akash vs the State Represented by, the Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467 and 468 of IPC r/w Section 66 D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, is on board for consideration.2. The case of the prosecution is that, the defacto complainant has been cheated

Joseph Thomas @ Sunny vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Sections 66 D and 67 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. The prosecution case is that, during the month of March 2020, the petitioner/first accused got acquainted with … CRIME POLICE STATION, KOLLAM CITY] APPLICANT/ACCUSED NO.1 JOSEPH THOMAS @ SUNNY, AGED 52 YEARS S/O. THOMAS, ARAKKAPARAMBIL -HOUSE, EDAKKARA-POST, MALAPPURAM-DISTRICT., PIN - 679331. BY ADVS. … Regular bail.2. The petitioner is the first accused in Crime No. was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Sections 66 D and 67

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … was urged that the revenue’s contention that statutory authorities’ claim for exemption is confined to the provision in Section 52 (2006) 4 SCC68353 1999 (2) SCR195(hereafter, “Board of Trustees of the Port of Madras”) 54 State of Karnataka

Karnataka State Beverages Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

is held as clarificatory in nature. Page No. 88 of the order for the Assessment Year 2012-2013. (xiv) Amendment made in Section 24 of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 is illegal. 3. The learned counsel for the … Bombay Steam Navigation Co. [1953] (P.) Ltd. v. CIT [1965] 56 ITR 52 (SC). Insofar as the opinion expressed by the Assessing Officer that the … the State Act relating to privilege fee and the claim of the petitioner that such fee is a first charge on profit preceding the charge of income-tax, is certainly required to be discouraged, being repugnant and inoperative.

India Tv Independent News Service Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Yashraj Fil ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

52 of the Copyright Act 1957 as it stood when the dispute arose i.e. prior to the Copyright Amendment Act 2012, she would be denuded from using excerpts of her performance for all times to come? Prima facie, … relation to their personal affairs. In other words, a discussion or an information or a talk in which public has an interest in which a … v. Positiv Television Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. , 2008 (38) PTC 477 (Del) ESPN Star Sports vs … has held that other than with the permission of the owner of a copyrightable work, it is only Section 52 of the Copyright Act 1957 which privileges use of copyrightable works and that the said section does not … would not justify public expenditure in the adjudicatory process. 55. Secondly, new technologies are emerging which increase the importance of amateur creative production and mix

M/S. Abraham Memorial Educational Trust and Others Vs. C. Suresh Babu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 85 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 149 of the Electricity Act, 2003, Section 47 of the Water (Prevention and Control of … the Negotiable Instruments Act was inserted in the Act w.e.f 01.04.1989, by amending the Act by means of Amendment Act 66 of 1988. This Chapter has been inserted with a view to enhance the acceptability of cheques in … Supreme Court in Ramanlal Bhailal Patel Vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2008 (5) SCC 449. wherein, in paragraph 29 of the said judgment the … by the drawer with adequate safeguards to prevent harassment of honest drawer. 52. According to the learned Amicus Curiae, the explanation of the term 'Company'

State of Kerala vs Krishnan

Court : Kerala

Investigating Officer or specific instructions of his supervising officers, if any. As per the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008 (5 of 2009) Sections(1A) and (1B) were inserted in Section 172, Cr.P.C. respectively witheffect from 31.12.2009, to provide … deceased Kripesh and respondents 3 and 4 are the parents of deceased Sarath Lal @ Joshy. The First Information Statement was lodged by one Sreekumar (CW1) and on its basis FIR No.81/2019 was registered at Bekal Police … of 2019 43equipment known as 'Lock-in-Amplifier', from Raja Ramana Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore under the Department of Atomic Energy. The said equipment was claimed … 406), Sudipta Lenka v. State of Odisha & Ors. ((2014) 11 SCC 527), Sujatha Ravi Kiran v. State of Kerala ((2016) 7 SCC 597), Vinubhai