Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … in establishing infrastructure projects: Function on “No Profit - No Loss” basis. 50 • Section 5 - Established and incorporated for securing the establishment of

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

service providers had exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … (IPC) would be attracted even for actions over the internet. In particular, Sections 124-A, 153-A, 153-B,292, 293, 295-A, 505, 505(2) IPC, it is submitted, suffice to cover the situations which are being used by the Union of

Commissioner Of Service Tax Delhi Vs. Quick Heal Technologies Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

is registered with the Service Tax Commissioner, Pune­III for providing taxable services, inter alia, under the category of “Information Technology Software 2 Service”. The assessee is engaged in the development of Quick Heal brand Antivirus Software which is … goods at all.51. The following principles to the extent relevant may be summed up:­ (a) The Constitution (Forty­sixth) Amendment Act intends to rope in various economic activities by enlarging the scope of “tax on sale or purchase of … to use of tangible goods service has also been brought under the service tax net by the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 16.05.2008 vide notification No.18/2008­ST, 35 dated 10.05.2008 whereby taxable service has been defined under Section … goods regardless of when or whether the goods are delivered for use 50 subject to the condition that the goods should be in existence for

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 2 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 Website. Snapdeal shall be entit ed to l block all such products and shall also have the right to suspend or terminate the Seller’s access to

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 2 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 Website. Snapdeal shall be entit ed to l block all such products and shall also have the right to suspend or terminate the Seller’s access to

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … Photo Wonder18. Newsdog 48. QQ Player19. Beutry Plus 49. We Meet20. WeChat 50. Sweet Selfie21. UC News 51. Baidu Translate 22 QQ Mail 52. Vmate23.

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … quashing of CR No.3212/2011 registered with the Cyber Crime Cell, Crime Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges

Sowdhamani Vs The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

of the Juvenile Justice Act,2015. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant who isthe District Information Technology Coordinator and Sirukamani Municipal Councilor in Trichy District, of a political party who has the habit of watching … petitioner, who is a woman, for the offences under Sections 504, 505(1) (b), 153 of IPC, 66E IT Act, 2008, 74, 77 of the Juvenile Justice Act,2015. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant who … as against the petitioner, who is a woman, for the offences under Sections 504, 505(1) (b), 153 of IPC, 66E IT Act, 2008, 74, 77 … against the petitioner, who is a woman, for the offences under Sections 504, 505(1) (b), 153 of IPC, 66E IT Act, 2008, 74, 77 of

Anilkumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the PoCSO Act’), and Section 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.4. Annexure-A2 is the statement of

Arti Meenakshi Muthiah vs the Commissioner of Police

Court : Chennai

be registered for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420 IPC and Sections 66, 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. Immediately, the 1st respondent Police have sent a notice to the 3 rd respondent Bank, based on which, … Police immediately and an FIR in Crime No.109 of 2020 came to be registered for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420 IPC and Sections 66, 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. Immediately, the