Advanced Search Results

Sandhya.K vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

of Cyber Crime Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 43 and 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Sections 465, 567, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code.2. The prosecution allegation is that accused Nos. 1to … as Crime No. 37 of 2022 of Cyber Crime Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 43 and 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Sections 465, 567, 468, 471 of Indian

1. Jeril Abraham vs 1. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

of Meenangadi Police Station, which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 43 and 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The aforesaid crime was registered on the basis of the complaint submitted by the 2nd respondent herein.2. Annexure-1 … is the accused in crime No.1035/2020 of Meenangadi Police Station, which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 43 and 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The aforesaid crime was registered on the basis

Ekene Godwin Vs. State Of Tamilnadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 66, read with Sections 43(J) and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The charge sheet has been filed, and the trial has proceeded. By the impugned order, the High Court

Omkar Sanjay Chatharwad vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

120(B) read with Section 34 of the IPC and under Sections 43, 66(C), 66(D), 70(3), 72 of the Information Technology Amendment Act 2008. The prosecution case, in brief, is this:2. The applicant had in furtherance of common intentionwith the other two

Nidheesh C.R. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 read with Section 34 of theI.P.C.; under Section 43 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 and under Section 120(o) of the Kerala Police Act.3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that during the

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Information Technology Act 2000 has been amended by the Parliament with effect from 27.10.2009 by way of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, in and under which, the word ''hacking'' has been removed in the amended Act, 2008 and Section 66 … replaced as follows: 66.Computer related offences: If any person, dishonestly or fraudulently, does any act referred to in Section 43, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine,

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, dishonestly or fraudulently, does any act referred to in section 43, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine

Dr. Madhukar G Angur vs the State

Court : Karnataka

for offences punishable under Sections 465 and 468 of the IPC and Sections 66 and 66D of the information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short).2. Heard Sri Kiran S.Javali, learned senior counsel appearingfor … 413 transactions. Hence, the charge against the accused under the Sections: 66, 66(D). of IT Act 2000 (Amended Act 2008) and Sec: 465, 468 IPC.” (Emphasis added)A perusal at the complaint and the summary of charge sheet is … Act reads as follows:“66. Computer related offences.-If any person, dishonestly or fraudulently, does any act referred to in Section 43, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

service providers had exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … the width and amplitude of Article 19(2) in the following paragraphs: “…. …. …. 1960 SCC Online SC 439. We shall now proceed to consider the constitutional validity of this section. The material portions of the relevant

M/S Geethanjali Effective Realty Solutions Pvt Ltd vs the Income Tax D ...

Court : Karnataka

PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR SUCH OTHER WRIT OR DECLARATION THAT THE LEGISLATURE BY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENT TO SECTIONS 191, 201, 43B, 40(a)(ia) RWS. 139 OF THE IT ACT HAS ALLOWED ADDITIONAL TIME TO THE … of streamlining and correcting anomalies. As discussed above, the amendments made in 2008 and 2010 were steps in - 15 -the said direction only. Legislative … SUCH OTHER WRIT OR DECLARATION THAT THE LEGISLATURE BY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENT TO SECTIONS 191, 201, 43B, 40(a)(ia) RWS. 139 OF THE IT ACT HAS ALLOWED … LEGISLATURE BY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENT TO SECTIONS 191, 201, 43B, 40(a)(ia) RWS. 139 OF THE IT ACT HAS … under the Provident Fund Act, the Municipal Corporation Act (octroi) and other tax laws. Therefore, by way of first proviso, an incentive/relaxation was sought to be given in respect of tax, duty, cess or fee by explicitly