Advanced Search Results

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … ploughed back to feed the charitable object. B. Arguments of the assessee-organizations 37. Mr. S.N. Soparkar, learned Senior Advocate appeared for the Ahmedabad Urban Development

Rana Ayyub Vs. Directorate Of Enforcement

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ghaziabad for alleged offences under Sections 403, 406, 418 and 420 IPC read with Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Section 4 of the Black Money Act.5. In the meantime, the petitioner received an order under Section … 2008 and Section 4 of the Black Money Act.5. In the meantime, the petitioner received an order under Section 37 of the FEMA read with Section 133(6) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 from the Mumbai Zonal Office

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

service providers had exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … are also incorporated in this Bill. So also a few minor amendments in respect of articles 341, 342, 372 and 376.”(Emphasis supplied) Thus, the statement makes it clear that the amendment was propelled by the judgments of

income Tax Officer Vs. Bothra International and ors.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

asst. yr. 1989-90 and the High Court has clearly given finding that amendment of excluding the income falling within the Clauses (iiia), (iiib) and (iiic) … B. Desrqj v. CIT (2008) 7 DTR (SC) 54, dt. 1st May, 2008 conclusively and clinchingly supports and views taken by the learned CIT(A). A … the Customs and central excise duties Drawback Rules, 1995 framed under Section 75(2) of the Customs Act and Section 37 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Under this scheme, drawback is allowed not only of the duties incurred … fact that DEPB and DDB are not part of export business profit from eligible articles or things.2. The first common ground relates to deletion of the trading addition of Rs. 5,00,000 and Rs. 3,00,000 made by the

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR, NO 374, MSQUARE, 100 FEET ROAD, HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRA NAGAR, BENGALURU, INDIA -

Sabarinath T.a vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

2005CriLJ 3115: 2005 All LJ 2334], N.R.Mon v. Md.Nasimuddin [2008 KHC 6547: 2008(6) SCC 721: 2008(2) KLD 316: 2008(2) KLT 1022: 2008(9) SCALE 334: AIR … and 307 IPC.9. No doubt, when the prosecution alleges possession of commercial quantity of contraband, the rider under Section 37 of the NDPS Act would apply. Section 37 of the NDPS Act provides as under:37. Offences to be … is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the first accused in Crime No.625 of 2022 of Kadakkavoor Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, where accused Nos.1 to 4 alleged to … provided under Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act. Unless Section37 is not amended by the legislature in cases specifically referred under Section 37(1)(b) of the

Abdul Jaleel C.P. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

under Section 37(1)(b) ofB.A.No.2416/2023 10the NDPS Act. Unless Section 37 is not amended by the legislature in cases specifically referred under Section 37(1)(b) of the … CriLJ 3115: 2005 All LJ 2334], N.R.Mon v. Md.Nasimuddin [2008 KHC 6547: 2008(6) SCC 721: 2008(2) KLD 316: 2008(2) KLT 1022: 2008(9) SCALE 334: AIR … in Rakesh Singh's case (supra), where in fact, intermediate quantity of contraband was involved and the rigour under Section 37 of the NDPS Act has no application. Summarizing so, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, complicity … is concerned. Therefore, itB.A.No.2416/2023 12 is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that, this Court rightly dismissed the first application for regular bail.7. On perusal of the materials available, the following factscould be gathered, prima facie. That

Manzoor Ali vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

CriLJ 3115: 2005 All LJ 2334], N.R.Mon v. Md.Nasimuddin [2008 KHC 6547: 2008(6) SCC 721: 2008(2) KLD 316: 2008(2) KLT 1022: 2008(9) SCALE 334: AIR … in Rakesh Singh's case (supra), where in fact, intermediate quantity of contraband was involved and the rigour under Section 37 of the NDPS Act has no application. Summarizing so, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, complicity … for the petitioners as well asthe learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary as such along with the report of the Investigating Officer, placed by the learned Public Prosecutor. Also gone through the decisions of the Apex … provided under Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act. Unless Section37 is not amended by the legislature in cases specifically referred under Section 37(1)(b) of the

Abdul Jaleel C.P vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

CriLJ 3115: 2005 All LJ 2334], N.R.Mon v. Md.Nasimuddin [2008 KHC 6547: 2008(6) SCC 721: 2008(2) KLD 316: 2008(2) KLT 1022: 2008(9) SCALE 334: AIR … in Rakesh Singh's case (supra), where in fact, intermediate quantity of contraband was involved and the rigour under Section 37 of the NDPS Act has no application. Summarizing so, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, complicity … for the petitioners as well asthe learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary as such along with the report of the Investigating Officer, placed by the learned Public Prosecutor. Also gone through the decisions of the Apex … provided under Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act. Unless Section37 is not amended by the legislature in cases specifically referred under Section 37(1)(b) of the