Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … "GIDC case"). 32 (2009) 16 SCC20833 2017 SCCOnline Bom 10021 (para 10-12) 34 (1965) 1 SCR909(hereafter “Navnit Lal Jhaveri”) 31 executive’s understanding - in the

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

enunciated thereunder. This court is conscious that a significant amendment to this provision took place in 2008; the Information Technology Amendment Act was brought into force on 5 February, 2009. However, that amendment brought in greater clarity to the nature … The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply if- FAO(OS) 540/2011 Page 34 the intermediary has conspired or abetted or aided or induced, whether by … orders, SCIL argued that MySpace, by using its content without licence or any authority committed infringing activities under Section 51(a)(i) and 51(a)(ii) of the Copyright Act (hereafter “the Act”).It argued that the moment MySpace communicated SCIL‟s works

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … role.39. Apart from the fact that the Complaint lacks necessary ingredients of Sections 405, 406, 420 read with Section 34 IPC, it is to be noted that the concept of ‘vicarious liability’ is unknown to criminal law. As

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … role.39. Apart from the fact that the Complaint lacks necessary ingredients of Sections 405, 406, 420 read with Section 34 IPC, it is to be noted that the concept of ‘vicarious liability’ is unknown to criminal law. As

Muhammed Sadhique P K vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Right to Information

offences punishable under Sections 420 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. The prosecution case is that, while the defactocomplainant was studying Online share trading through You Tube, the

Darla Praveen Kumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Station, Kollam, registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 34 of the IPC and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. The prosecution against the petitioner is that he cheated the defacto complainant and obtained an amount of

Ranchodmal Rathod Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

No.7 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 of IPC and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The complaint is that the defacto complainant was approached and he was asked to join the Wazzup group

Anil Kumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 68 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 as per the order dated 26.08.2022 in S.C. No.361/2019 on the files of the trial court. The order … the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, Sections 419, 420, 468 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 68 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and Section 66D of

Joseph Thomas @ Sunny vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Sections 66 D and 67 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. The prosecution case is that, during the month of March 2020, the petitioner/first accused got acquainted with … Regular bail.2. The petitioner is the first accused in Crime No. was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Sections 66 D and 67