Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology amendment act 2008 section 30 · Page 1 of about 786 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 23 2024

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2024

Subject : Right to Information

children over the internet.145. The aforesaid was due to the fact that, the IT Act prior to the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (for short, the ‘2008 Amendment Act’), criminalized only one act being the publication or transmission of obscene material, … 86 d. Scope of Section 67B of the IT Act.................................................................... 95 iii. Presumption of Culpable Mental State under Section 30 of the POCSO. 108 a. Concept of Statutory Presumption and Principle of Foundational Facts. .......... 110 b. Foundational

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax Kolkata Xii Vs. M/S Calcutta Export Company

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-2018

Subject : Education

40(a)(ia) of IT Act.18) With a view to mitigate this hardship, Section 40(a)(ia) was amended by the Finance Act, 2008 and the provision so amended read as under:-“40. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Sections 30 to 38, … perused the factual matrix of the case. Point(s) for consideration:-5) Whether the amendment made by the Finance Act, 2010 in Section 40(a)(ia) of the IT … remaining eleven months of the previous year. It was provided that in case of assessees falling under the first category, no disallowance under Section 40(a) (ia) of the IT Act shall be made if the tax deducted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2008

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-03-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 01 2010

Koshy Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-01-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 65, 66, 66(1), 66(2) and 77B; ;Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83 and 438; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 419 and 420

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT945

is bailable in view of Section 77B of the Information Technology Act. Section 77B was introduced by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (Act 10 of 2009). Section 77B provides that notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, … by Dr. K.A. Koshy and Dr. Serena, who are two accused persons among the accused in Crime No. 30 of 2010 of Rajpura City Police Station, Patjala District, Punjab.2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Crime No. 30

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2022

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … or even a series 11 (LVI) Lok Sabha Debates., 32nd scs., p. 3073 (August 18, 1961). 12 (1976) 1 SCC254(hereafter “Lok Shikshana Trust”) 10 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2026

Smriti Achuthan vs the State Represented by

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-03-2026

to have committed offences punishable under Sections 408 and 420 of the IPC and Section 66A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. .. A-5 Smriti Achuthan, joined Pace Automation, an executive assistant to the Chairman and CEO, on 01.06.2009. She … 2000, read with Section 120B of IPC, a case has been registered in Crime No.172 of 2011 dated 30.03.2011, pursuant to a complaint dated 31.01.2011 lodged by the defacto complainant. Since the petitioner claimed herself as innocent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2024

Anilkumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-30-2024

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the PoCSO Act’), and Section 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.4. Annexure-A2 is the statement of … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1946 CRL.REV.PET NO. 805 OF 2022 CRIME NO.1385/2013 OF MANNUTHY POLICE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2026

S.Bharath Kumar Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-10-2026

in Crime No. 9 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 IPC and 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 has filed this quash petition.2. The de facto complainant/the Senior AdministrativeOfficer of 2nd respondent Institution lodged a complaint … litres of diesel worth Rs. 5,66,547.12/- at Perry Agencies in Guindy on 30 th September, 2022 to purchase diesel using an additional linked mobile number … Mr. Gopakumar, ICMR-NIRT, No.1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in connection with Crime No. 9 of 2025 on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2023

1. Jeril Abraham vs 1. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-06-2023

of Meenangadi Police Station, which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 43 and 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The aforesaid crime was registered on the basis of the complaint submitted by the 2nd respondent herein.2. Annexure-1 … is the accused in crime No.1035/2020 of Meenangadi Police Station, which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 43 and 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The aforesaid crime was registered on the basis … OF 2022 CRIME NO.1035/2020 OF MEENANGADI POLICE STATION PETITIONER/S: JERIL ABRAHAM AGED 30 YEARS S/O AVARACHAN, PULPARAMBIL (H), BY ADVS. T.P.PRADEEP P.K.SATHEES KUMAR MINIKUMARY M.V.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2024

Jibin vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-11-2024

registered for the offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The 2 nd respondent is the defacto complainant.3. According to the prosecution, on 12.10.2023 and on 30.10.2023,the accused

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial