Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … • Section 3 & 28 - Government of Karnataka (GOK) that acquires the land from the public. • Section 29 - GOK determines the price and pays the compensation. • Section 43 - No duty under the Karnataka

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

off and implementation of the Aadhaar scheme.7) On March 03, 2006, approval was given by the Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India for the project titled ‘Unique Identification for BPL Families’ … an obligation on the Authority to ensure the security of identity information and authentication records of individuals. Likewise, Section 29 imposes certain restrictions on sharing information i.e. core biometric information collected or created under the Act or the … inalienable rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Second Amendment to the US Constitution refers inter alia to security of person, while

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

service providers had exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … Reserved on : 29.07.2025 RPronounced on : 24.09.2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … documents as requested. Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 2 0 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 4.17.8. On 22.08.2017 and 29.05.2017, the Deputy Drugs Controller, Mysuru sent emails to Snapdeal to ascertain whether the Constitution details of Snapdeal were

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … documents as requested. Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 2 0 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 4.17.8. On 22.08.2017 and 29.05.2017, the Deputy Drugs Controller, Mysuru sent emails to Snapdeal to ascertain whether the Constitution details of Snapdeal were

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … Reserved on : 21.03.2025Pronounced on : 29.04.2025 RIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 29TH DAY

Shaik Noushad Ahammed vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CONNECTION WITH FIR NO.30 OF 2025 REGISTERED U/S 66 OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (AMENDMENT) ACT 2008, 61(2), 127(7), 318(4), 308(2) OF THE BNS 2023, BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.2 CYBER CRIME PS SAS NAGAR PUNJAB AND … Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.30/2025 registered byCyber Crime Police Station, SAS Nagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 308(2), 318(4), 127(7) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, … MUDASIR HUSSAIN Digitally S/O NASIR HUSSAIN signed byNANDINI M S AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS Location: R/AT 17, 3RD CROSS HIGH COURT MASJID STREET, J.C. NAGAROF

Muthu Sivalingam vs State Rep by, the Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

respect of Crime No.55 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 of IPC, 66(D) of Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 @ u/s.420, 120(B) of IPC, 66D of IT Act, 2008 is on board for consideration. 2.The incarceration of … Inspector of Police Vellore District. (Crime No.55 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.55 of 2024 … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Muthu Sivalingam ... Petitioner Vs. State, Rep.

Sandhya.K vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

of Cyber Crime Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 43 and 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Sections 465, 567, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code.2. The prosecution allegation is that accused Nos. 1to … as Crime No. 37 of 2022 of Cyber Crime Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 43 and 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Sections 465, 567, 468, 471 of Indian … COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 5782

Jibin vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

registered for the offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The 2 nd respondent is the defacto complainant.3. According to the prosecution, on 12.10.2023 and on 30.10.2023,the accused … :1 JIBIN AGED 28 YEARS, S/O ANIL, BADANIYA HOUSE, POOJAPPURA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695012 2 ANANTHU AGED 29 YEARS, S/O VENUGOPAL, SHEELA BHAVAN, POOVAKKADU, KAZHAKOOTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695022 3 RAHUL AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. VELAYUDHAN,