Advanced Search Results

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

off and implementation of the Aadhaar scheme.7) On March 03, 2006, approval was given by the Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India for the project titled ‘Unique Identification for BPL Families’ … and annual report of the Authority.36) Chapter VI deals with the important aspects pertaining to ‘protection of information’. Section 28 of the Aadhaar Act puts an obligation on the Authority to ensure the security of identity information and … inalienable rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Second Amendment to the US Constitution refers inter alia to security of person, while

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

service providers had exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … Newspapers (Bombay)(P) Ltd. v. Union of India [(1985) 1 SCC 641: 1985 SCC (Tax) 121: (1985) 2 SCR 287], Venkataramiah, J. stated: (SCC p. 671, para 44: SCR pp. 324F-325A) “While examining the constitutionality of a law

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … M/s. Pepsi Foods Ltd and anr. vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and Ors (1998) 5 SCC749 more particularly para 28 thereof which is hereunder reproduced for easy reference:28. Summoning of an accused in a criminal case is a

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … M/s. Pepsi Foods Ltd and anr. vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and Ors (1998) 5 SCC749 more particularly para 28 thereof which is hereunder reproduced for easy reference:28. Summoning of an accused in a criminal case is a

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … is said to have tarnished her personal reputation in the society.3. On 28-09-2024 the next day, notice of legal action andformal abuse complaint was issued

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person,

Shaik Noushad Ahammed vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CONNECTION WITH FIR NO.30 OF 2025 REGISTERED U/S 66 OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (AMENDMENT) ACT 2008, 61(2), 127(7), 318(4), 308(2) OF THE BNS 2023, BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.2 CYBER CRIME PS SAS NAGAR PUNJAB AND … Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.30/2025 registered byCyber Crime Police Station, SAS Nagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 308(2), 318(4), 127(7) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, … KARNATAKA - 560 084.2. AZEEZ MOHAMMED MUSTAFA S/O R.A. JANAB AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT 20/2 J.S. RESIDENCE HARRIS ROAD, BENSON TOWN BENGALURU, KARNATAKA -

A.a Abdulla vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

offences involved are punishable under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. The prosecution allegation in short is as follows:The petitioner received a telephone call on 20.07.2024 from an … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(CRL.) NO. 1376 OF 2024 PETITIONER: A.A ABDULLA AGED 75

Haridass Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police,

Court : Chennai

hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 318(4) of BNS and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008, in Crime No.32 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of … BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28.01.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.57 of 2026 Haridass ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu,

Raju Basappa Chalawadi Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Polic ...

Court : Chennai

custody on 04.12.2025 for the offences punishable under Section 318(4) of the BNS and Section 66 D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 in Crime No. 141 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The case of … BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD) NO. 1199 of 2026 Raju Basappa Chalawadi Petitioner(s) Vs State through, The