Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology amendment act 2008 section 27 · Page 1 of about 623 results (0.064 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 19 2022

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) 27. Section 2(15) - which had been amended last, in 198324, was again … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2021

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … C.C.No.156/2020 pending before the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CMM, Mysuru taking Cognisance of the offences punishable under Section 27(a)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and issuing Summons to the petitioners.2. The Petitioner in Crl.P. No.4712/2020

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2021

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … C.C.No.156/2020 pending before the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CMM, Mysuru taking Cognisance of the offences punishable under Section 27(a)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and issuing Summons to the petitioners.2. The Petitioner in Crl.P. No.4712/2020

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 13 2009

Mayawati Vs. Cit (Central-i) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-13-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 138, 139, 139(1), 142(1), 143(2), 143(3), 147, 148 to 153, 153(2) and 163; Finance Act, 1996; Finance Act, 2002; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 27; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(Del)117; 157(2009)DLT324; [2010]321ITR249(Delhi)

to Sub-section (2) of Section 143, as it stood immediately before the amendment of said Sub-section by the Finance Act, 2002 (20 of 2002) but … IT Act must also be served within the period set-down in that Section since the discussion centered upon Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 which specifies that service of such a notice would be presumed to … the Petitioner on 29.3.2008 at her Humayun Road, New Delhi residence, in the course of which he was informed that she had shifted her residence to 3, Nehru Road, Cantonment, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh where the Notice should

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2014

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-04-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Information Technology Act 2000 has been amended by the Parliament with effect from 27.10.2009 by way of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, in and under which, the word ''hacking'' has been removed in the amended Act, 2008 and Section 66

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2013

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2013

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2026

Ranchodmal Rathod Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-09-2026

No.7 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 of IPC and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The complaint is that the defacto complainant was approached and he was asked to join the Wazzup group … Respondent(s) PRAYER To call for the records and quash the 41(A) Cr.P.C. Notice issued by the respondent dated 27.12.2025 against the petitioner herein and pass such orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Murugavel For Respondent(s): M/s.R. Rajasekaran Government Advocate (crl.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2023

Prinu vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-03-2023

alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Section 294(b) of IPC and Sections 66E and 67 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.4. Respondent No.2, the defacto complainant, entered appearance through counsel. An affidavit sworn to by her has also … STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 DARSHANA, AGED 27 YEARS D/O RAJESH KUMAR, CHAKOTTIL HOUSE, MUDAKKOT, KURISSI DESAM, CHALAVARA VILLAGE, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD, PIN - 679101 R1 BY

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2025

Anil Kumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-10-2025

Subject : Education

the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 68 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 as per the order dated 26.08.2022 in S.C. No.361/2019 on the files of the trial court. The order … OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL FOR MARADU CASES) KOZHIKODEREVISION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 32, 33, 35 AND 36 (ORIGINAL ACCUSED NOS.29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 40, 41, 43

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2022

Commissioner Of Service Tax Delhi Vs. Quick Heal Technologies Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-05-2022

Subject : Service Tax

is registered with the Service Tax Commissioner, Pune­III for providing taxable services, inter alia, under the category of “Information Technology Software 2 Service”. The assessee is engaged in the development of Quick Heal brand Antivirus Software which is … goods at all.51. The following principles to the extent relevant may be summed up:­ (a) The Constitution (Forty­sixth) Amendment Act intends to rope in various economic activities by enlarging the scope of “tax on sale or purchase of … to use of tangible goods service has also been brought under the service tax net by the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 16.05.2008 vide notification No.18/2008­ST, 35 dated 10.05.2008 whereby taxable service has been defined under Section … you perform such suggestive actions or not and Quick Heal assumes no 27 responsibility/ liability for any liability arising out of such actions/inactions.9. QUICK HEAL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial