Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 B. Arguments of the assessee-organizations ................................................................................................. 26 C. Revenue’s rebuttal arguments................................................................................................................... 54 III. Analysis and reasoning ............................................................................................................................... 55 A.

Muthu Sivalingam vs State Rep by, the Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

respect of Crime No.55 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 of IPC, 66(D) of Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 @ u/s.420, 120(B) of IPC, 66D of IT Act, 2008 is on board for consideration. 2.The incarceration of … Inspector of Police Vellore District. (Crime No.55 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.55 of 2024 … is on board for consideration. 2.The incarceration of the petitioner being from 26.11.2024 pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner and false implication in

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … images, sound, voice, codes, computer programmes, software and data bases or micro film or computer generated micro fiche.” 26 A perusal of all these definitions would indicate that had the Legislature intended to leave out or exclude

Dr. Madhukar G Angur vs the State

Court : Karnataka

for offences punishable under Sections 465 and 468 of the IPC and Sections 66 and 66D of the information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short).2. Heard Sri Kiran S.Javali, learned senior counsel appearingfor … 413 transactions. Hence, the charge against the accused under the Sections: 66, 66(D). of IT Act 2000 (Amended Act 2008) and Sec: 465, 468 IPC.” (Emphasis added)A perusal at the complaint and the summary of charge sheet is … VANDANA P. L., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE … official website, and to get wrongful gain in the form of Fees.On 26-12-2016, the accused has sent a soft copy of letter prepared on the

Shaik Noushad Ahammed vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CONNECTION WITH FIR NO.30 OF 2025 REGISTERED U/S 66 OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (AMENDMENT) ACT 2008, 61(2), 127(7), 318(4), 308(2) OF THE BNS 2023, BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.2 CYBER CRIME PS SAS NAGAR PUNJAB AND … Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.30/2025 registered byCyber Crime Police Station, SAS Nagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 308(2), 318(4), 127(7) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, … SHAIK NOUSHAD AHAMMED S/O S MOHIADDEN SAHEB AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT 26/4, 9TH MAIN 12TH CROSS, SONAPPA BLOCK 3RD STAGE, PILLANNA GARDEN BENGALURU, KARNATAKA

Gokul Krishna G.S vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Crime Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram Rural, registered under Sections 354C and 509 of IPC, Sections 66E and 67 of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Section 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, for quashing Annexure-A1 First Information

Vinod vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

for the offences punishable under Sections 354C and 306 of Indian Penal Code and Section 66E of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. Heard both sides and perused the records.4. The learned counsel for the petitionersubmitted that the parties have … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 4TH SRAVANA, 1943 CRL.MC NO. 2929 OF 2021 CRIME NO. 100/2021 OF KANAKAKUNNU

Vijay Baskaran Vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Polic ...

Court : Chennai

wherein the petitioner is said to have committed offences under Section 420 of IPC and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008.2. Pending investigation, the parties have entered into a compromisewherein the defacto complainant has agreed for quashing of

Ajimuddin Ansari vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

District, alleging commission of offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wouldsubmit that the entire issues between the petitioner and the 2 … OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 26TH KARTHIKA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 7439 OF 2023 CRIME NO.11/2023 OF CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION, THRISSUR, Thrissur PETITIONER/ACCUSED: AJIMUDDIN