Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … next decision of importance is Indian Chamber of Commerce v. CIT13. The appellant-chamber was a company registered under Section 25 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. Its memorandum and articles of association stipulated certain broad objects, which this

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Information Technology Act 2000 has been amended by the Parliament with effect from 27.10.2009 by way of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, in and under which, the word ''hacking'' has been removed in the amended Act, 2008 and Section 66 … of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).(b)the word fraudulently shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 25 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). It is sought to be argued on the side of

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860); (b) the word “fraudulently” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 25 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).” 29 Therefore, Chapter XI terms the acts covered in each

Dr. Madhukar G Angur vs the State

Court : Karnataka

for offences punishable under Sections 465 and 468 of the IPC and Sections 66 and 66D of the information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short).2. Heard Sri Kiran S.Javali, learned senior counsel appearingfor … 413 transactions. Hence, the charge against the accused under the Sections: 66, 66(D). of IT Act 2000 (Amended Act 2008) and Sec: 465, 468 IPC.” (Emphasis added)A perusal at the complaint and the summary of charge sheet is … in time are appended to the petition. In 2010, Alliance Business School Private Limited, a company registered under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Alliance Business School Private Limited is the sponsoring body to the Alliance

b.k Educational Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Parag Gupta and Associates

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tribunal Discharges functions of Appellate Tribunal under Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act, 2008 Appellate Tribunal under Information Technology Act, 2000 Appellate Tribunal under Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 under Appellate Tribunal Competition Act, 2002 … the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”), which was inserted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second 1 Amendment) Act, 2018 with effect from 06.06.2018. The said Section is as follows: “238A. Limitation.-The provisions of the Limitation Act, … For this purpose, he relied upon a number of judgments and Sections 25(3), 60 and 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. He also handed

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … and on investigation, they have discovered that these 2017 SCC online MAD 25298students were participants in the Blue Whale Challenge. Unfortunately, on being questioned, they

Sasidharan M.G. vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

It is submitted that in exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (1) of section 70B of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. 2008, effective from 27 10.2009, appointed the Respondent No.5 Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (hereinafter CERT In) to serve … CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 25TH JYAISHTA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 10819 OF 2021 PETITIONER: SASIDHARAN M.G. AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.LATE GOPALAN, MATHRU BHAVANAM KARAPPUZHA,

Dominic Thomas vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

First Class Magistrate charging the petitioner under Section 65, 43 read with Section 66 of the Information Technology(Amendment) Act, 2008. True copies of Mahazar and seizure list prepared by the Circle Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime, Thiruvananthapuram are … the fifth respondent.2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitionersubmitted that an explanation was submitted by the petitioner on 25.09.2010 before the Sub Inspector, Cyber Enquiry Cell that fifth respondent was not entrusted with any project and therefore

S.Bharath Kumar Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

in Crime No. 9 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 IPC and 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 has filed this quash petition.2. The de facto complainant/the Senior AdministrativeOfficer of 2nd respondent Institution lodged a complaint … services of HPCL Drive Track Plus Account for consumption of diesel for 25 mobile X-ray buses and associated generators. To facilitate cashless transaction nationwide, funds … Mr. Gopakumar, ICMR-NIRT, No.1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in connection with Crime No. 9 of 2025 on the

Poongodi Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Ccd- III

Court : Chennai

No.57 of 2025 was registered for the offences under Sections 318(4) of BNS, 2023, r/w Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. Even FIR was registered on 14.06.2025, there is no progress in the investigation. Hence, she filed this petition.10. … statutory timelines by the investigating agency.15. The Criminal Original Petition is accordingly disposed of with the above directions. 25.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No dss To1. The Inspector