Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … next decision of importance is Indian Chamber of Commerce v. CIT13. The appellant-chamber was a company registered under Section 25 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. Its memorandum and articles of association stipulated certain broad objects, which this

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Information Technology Act 2000 has been amended by the Parliament with effect from 27.10.2009 by way of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, in and under which, the word ''hacking'' has been removed in the amended Act, 2008 and Section 66 … of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).(b)the word fraudulently shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 25 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). It is sought to be argued on the side of

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860); (b) the word “fraudulently” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 25 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).” 29 Therefore, Chapter XI terms the acts covered in each

b.k Educational Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Parag Gupta and Associates

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tribunal Discharges functions of Appellate Tribunal under Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act, 2008 Appellate Tribunal under Information Technology Act, 2000 Appellate Tribunal under Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 under Appellate Tribunal Competition Act, 2002 … the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”), which was inserted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second 1 Amendment) Act, 2018 with effect from 06.06.2018. The said Section is as follows: “238A. Limitation.-The provisions of the Limitation Act, … For this purpose, he relied upon a number of judgments and Sections 25(3), 60 and 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. He also handed

Dominic Thomas vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

First Class Magistrate charging the petitioner under Section 65, 43 read with Section 66 of the Information Technology(Amendment) Act, 2008. True copies of Mahazar and seizure list prepared by the Circle Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime, Thiruvananthapuram are … the fifth respondent.2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitionersubmitted that an explanation was submitted by the petitioner on 25.09.2010 before the Sub Inspector, Cyber Enquiry Cell that fifth respondent was not entrusted with any project and therefore

S.Bharath Kumar Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

in Crime No. 9 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 IPC and 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 has filed this quash petition.2. The de facto complainant/the Senior AdministrativeOfficer of 2nd respondent Institution lodged a complaint … services of HPCL Drive Track Plus Account for consumption of diesel for 25 mobile X-ray buses and associated generators. To facilitate cashless transaction nationwide, funds … Mr. Gopakumar, ICMR-NIRT, No.1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in connection with Crime No. 9 of 2025 on the

Luhar Shaileshbhai Vaghaji vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

complainant.3. The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Section 420 of IPC and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.4. The 3rd respondent entered appearance through counsel. An affidavit sworn in by him is also produced.5. I … JYAISHTA, 1945 CRIME NO.14/2021 OF CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE PETITIONER/ACCUSED: LUHAR SHAILESHBHAI VAGHAJI, S/O. VAGHAJI LUHAR, AGED 25 YEARS, THAKOR VA, MORAL, BANASKANNTHA, GUJARAT, PIN - 385535 BY ADVS. T.D.SUSMITH KUMAR T.O.DEEPA C.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS/STATE/COMPLAINANT/DE FACTO COMPLAINANT:1

A.NITHIN KUMAR Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

2023, 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002, 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendement) Act, 2008. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the … The Inspector Police, CCD-1, Cyber Crime Police station, Chennai-South.2. R.Varshini ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in Crime No.08 of 2025, … Cr.P.C., to call for the records in Crime No.08 of 2025, dated 25.02.2025 on the file of the 1 st respondent police and quash the

Ajith Kumar, Rep. By his father, Sivagangai District and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Police Station Crime No.25 of 2016 for offences under Sections 509, 153(A) IPC and Section 67(A) of the Information Technology Amendment Act, 2008 and the allegation against this petitioner is that he had made derogatory remarks about women of another community

Anil Kumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 68 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 as per the order dated 26.08.2022 in S.C. No.361/2019 on the files of the trial court. The order … OF 2019 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL FOR MARADU CASES) KOZHIKODEREVISION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 32, 33, 35 AND 36 (ORIGINAL ACCUSED NOS.29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 40,