Advanced Search Results

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

children over the internet.145. The aforesaid was due to the fact that, the IT Act prior to the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (for short, the ‘2008 Amendment Act’), criminalized only one act being the publication or transmission of obscene material, … & 3 / the State. ................. 22 D. ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION ......................................................... 24 E. ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 25 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions. ................................................ 25 … Scheme of the POCSO. ................................................ 25 b. Relevant Provisions of the IT Act. ..................................................................... 38 ii. Scope of Section 15 of the POCSO and Section 67B of the IT Act. ............ 40 a. Contradictory Views of different

Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

enunciated thereunder. This court is conscious that a significant amendment to this provision took place in 2008; the Information Technology Amendment Act was brought into force on 5 February, 2009. However, that amendment brought in greater clarity to the nature … internet transactions, is explained through a diagram, extracted below: FAO(OS) 540/2011 Page 24 User /Uploader A ISP (Internet service provider) B E-Commerce site C1 Music/content … orders, SCIL argued that MySpace, by using its content without licence or any authority committed infringing activities under Section 51(a)(i) and 51(a)(ii) of the Copyright Act (hereafter “the Act”).It argued that the moment MySpace communicated SCIL‟s works

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Information Technology Act 2000 has been amended by the Parliament with effect from 27.10.2009 by way of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, in and under which, the word ''hacking'' has been removed in the amended Act, 2008 and Section 66 … For the purposes of this section - (a)the word dishonestly shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 24 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).(b)the word fraudulently shall have the meaning assigned to it in

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … the purposes of this section -- (a) the word “dishonestly” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 24 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860); (b) the word “fraudulently” shall have the meaning assigned to

Commissioner Of Service Tax Delhi Vs. Quick Heal Technologies Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

is registered with the Service Tax Commissioner, Pune­III for providing taxable services, inter alia, under the category of “Information Technology Software 2 Service”. The assessee is engaged in the development of Quick Heal brand Antivirus Software which is … goods at all.51. The following principles to the extent relevant may be summed up:­ (a) The Constitution (Forty­sixth) Amendment Act intends to rope in various economic activities by enlarging the scope of “tax on sale or purchase of … to use of tangible goods service has also been brought under the service tax net by the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 16.05.2008 vide notification No.18/2008­ST, 35 dated 10.05.2008 whereby taxable service has been defined under Section … and exempted excise duty on such “packaged software or canned software”.” 15 24. He vehemently submitted that the transaction cannot be bifurcated into two components

Smriti Achuthan vs the State Represented by

Court : Chennai

to have committed offences punishable under Sections 408 and 420 of the IPC and Section 66A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. .. A-5 Smriti Achuthan, joined Pace Automation, an executive assistant to the Chairman and CEO, on 01.06.2009. She … end in her acquittal.c. The Trial Court ought to have seen that while the de-facto complainant's complain dated 24-01-2011, based on which the FIR dated 30-03- 2011 came to be registered alleges certain acts said to have

Dominic Thomas vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

First Class Magistrate charging the petitioner under Section 65, 43 read with Section 66 of the Information Technology(Amendment) Act, 2008. True copies of Mahazar and seizure list prepared by the Circle Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime, Thiruvananthapuram are … 001. *ADDL.9 ADDL.R9 THE DIRECTOR, FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. [ADDL.R9 IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 24.11.2012 IN WP(C) 6759/2012] BY ADVS. SRI.JUSTIN JACOB, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER STATE ATTORNEY SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM) STATE ATTORNEY THIS WRIT PETITION

Jibin vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

registered for the offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The 2 nd respondent is the defacto complainant.3. According to the prosecution, on 12.10.2023 and on 30.10.2023,the accused … RAHUL AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. VELAYUDHAN, KONDUKATTIL VEEDU, ANAKKARA P.O., PALAKKAD, PIN - 685 512 4 ABHINAV AGED 24 YEARS, S/O. MOHANAN, KIZHAKKAYIL VEEDU, KONDUKADU P.O., KUTTIYADI, PIN - 673 508 BY ADVS. MITHUN P. AFSAL KHAN

Ranchodmal Rathod Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

No.7 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 of IPC and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The complaint is that the defacto complainant was approached and he was asked to join the Wazzup group … in CSR.No.3 of 2024. The petitioner appeared and given his explanation and also his account was de-frozed on 24.01.2024. Thereafter, another notice from HDFC Bank freezing the petitioner’s OD account was received referring to Crime No.7 of

Anil Kumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 68 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 as per the order dated 26.08.2022 in S.C. No.361/2019 on the files of the trial court. The order … NO.361 OF 2019 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL FOR MARADU CASES) KOZHIKODEREVISION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 32, 33, 35 AND 36 (ORIGINAL ACCUSED NOS.29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36,