Advanced Search Results

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

children over the internet.145. The aforesaid was due to the fact that, the IT Act prior to the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (for short, the ‘2008 Amendment Act’), criminalized only one act being the publication or transmission of obscene material, … & 3 / the State. ................. 22 D. ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION ......................................................... 24 E. ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 25 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions. ................................................ 25 … Scheme of the POCSO. ................................................ 25 b. Relevant Provisions of the IT Act. ..................................................................... 38 ii. Scope of Section 15 of the POCSO and Section 67B of the IT Act. ............ 40 a. Contradictory Views of different

Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

enunciated thereunder. This court is conscious that a significant amendment to this provision took place in 2008; the Information Technology Amendment Act was brought into force on 5 February, 2009. However, that amendment brought in greater clarity to the nature … internet transactions, is explained through a diagram, extracted below: FAO(OS) 540/2011 Page 24 User /Uploader A ISP (Internet service provider) B E-Commerce site C1 Music/content … orders, SCIL argued that MySpace, by using its content without licence or any authority committed infringing activities under Section 51(a)(i) and 51(a)(ii) of the Copyright Act (hereafter “the Act”).It argued that the moment MySpace communicated SCIL‟s works

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Information Technology Act 2000 has been amended by the Parliament with effect from 27.10.2009 by way of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, in and under which, the word ''hacking'' has been removed in the amended Act, 2008 and Section 66 … For the purposes of this section - (a)the word dishonestly shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 24 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).(b)the word fraudulently shall have the meaning assigned to it in

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … the purposes of this section -- (a) the word “dishonestly” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 24 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860); (b) the word “fraudulently” shall have the meaning assigned to

Dr. Madhukar G Angur vs the State

Court : Karnataka

for offences punishable under Sections 465 and 468 of the IPC and Sections 66 and 66D of the information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short).2. Heard Sri Kiran S.Javali, learned senior counsel appearingfor … 413 transactions. Hence, the charge against the accused under the Sections: 66, 66(D). of IT Act 2000 (Amended Act 2008) and Sec: 465, 468 IPC.” (Emphasis added)A perusal at the complaint and the summary of charge sheet is … both. Explanation.-For the purposes of this section,-(a) the word “dishonestly” shall have the meaning assigned to it in Section 24 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860);(b) the word “fraudulently” shall have the meaningassigned to it in

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

service providers had exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … Reserved on : 29.07.2025 RPronounced on : 24.09.2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.

Commissioner Of Service Tax Delhi Vs. Quick Heal Technologies Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

is registered with the Service Tax Commissioner, Pune­III for providing taxable services, inter alia, under the category of “Information Technology Software 2 Service”. The assessee is engaged in the development of Quick Heal brand Antivirus Software which is … goods at all.51. The following principles to the extent relevant may be summed up:­ (a) The Constitution (Forty­sixth) Amendment Act intends to rope in various economic activities by enlarging the scope of “tax on sale or purchase of … to use of tangible goods service has also been brought under the service tax net by the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 16.05.2008 vide notification No.18/2008­ST, 35 dated 10.05.2008 whereby taxable service has been defined under Section … and exempted excise duty on such “packaged software or canned software”.” 15 24. He vehemently submitted that the transaction cannot be bifurcated into two components

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … from the website or online platform, forthwith and in any event within 24 hours of receipt of the court order. Since this timeframe is mandated

Sasidharan M.G. vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

It is submitted that in exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (1) of section 70B of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. 2008, effective from 27 10.2009, appointed the Respondent No.5 Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (hereinafter CERT In) to serve

Smriti Achuthan vs the State Represented by

Court : Chennai

to have committed offences punishable under Sections 408 and 420 of the IPC and Section 66A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. .. A-5 Smriti Achuthan, joined Pace Automation, an executive assistant to the Chairman and CEO, on 01.06.2009. She … end in her acquittal.c. The Trial Court ought to have seen that while the de-facto complainant's complain dated 24-01-2011, based on which the FIR dated 30-03- 2011 came to be registered alleges certain acts said to have