Advanced Search Results

Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

enunciated thereunder. This court is conscious that a significant amendment to this provision took place in 2008; the Information Technology Amendment Act was brought into force on 5 February, 2009. However, that amendment brought in greater clarity to the nature … users to post infringing content and that the exception FAO(OS) 540/2011 Page 23 of Section 52 would be considered if at all, on case to … orders, SCIL argued that MySpace, by using its content without licence or any authority committed infringing activities under Section 51(a)(i) and 51(a)(ii) of the Copyright Act (hereafter “the Act”).It argued that the moment MySpace communicated SCIL‟s works

Commissioner Of Service Tax Delhi Vs. Quick Heal Technologies Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

is registered with the Service Tax Commissioner, Pune­III for providing taxable services, inter alia, under the category of “Information Technology Software 2 Service”. The assessee is engaged in the development of Quick Heal brand Antivirus Software which is … goods at all.51. The following principles to the extent relevant may be summed up:­ (a) The Constitution (Forty­sixth) Amendment Act intends to rope in various economic activities by enlarging the scope of “tax on sale or purchase of … to use of tangible goods service has also been brought under the service tax net by the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 16.05.2008 vide notification No.18/2008­ST, 35 dated 10.05.2008 whereby taxable service has been defined under Section … In addition to this security software, Quick Heal offers you Quick Heal 23 Remote Device Management Services to manage your device(s). Quick Heal reserves all

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … term which may extend to five years and also with fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees.” 23 The argument of the Petitioner's Advocate is that the First Information Report does not disclose any offence. The

Mahadev Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Right to Information

to Section 275 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Act 5 of 2009 (Code of Criminal Procedure amendment) Act, 2008, which runs as follows:"Provided that evidence of a witness under this Sub-Section may also be recorded by Audio-Video … so, on what terms. 8.14 The Court shall be guided by the provisions of the CPC and Chapter XXIII, Part B of the CrPC, the Evidence Act and the IT Act while examining a person through video

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be

Commissioner of Income Tax Kolkata Xii Vs. M/S Calcutta Export Company

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

perused the factual matrix of the case. Point(s) for consideration:-5) Whether the amendment made by the Finance Act, 2010 in Section 40(a)(ia) of the IT … 40(a)(ia) of IT Act.18) With a view to mitigate this hardship, Section 40(a)(ia) was amended by the Finance Act, 2008 and the provision so amended read as under:-“40. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Sections 30 to 38, … remaining eleven months of the previous year. It was provided that in case of assessees falling under the first category, no disallowance under Section 40(a) (ia) of the IT Act shall be made if the tax deducted … 4,58,99,999/- with the requirement to pay the additional tax amount of Rs. 23,88,832/- by the Respondent. (b) Being aggrieved by the order dated 12.10.2009, the

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Information Technology Act 2000 has been amended by the Parliament with effect from 27.10.2009 by way of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, in and under which, the word ''hacking'' has been removed in the amended Act, 2008 and Section 66

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4676 OF2020BETWEEN:1. SRI. KUNAL BAHL CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF M/S JASPER INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED, 238 1ST FLOOR, OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110020 2. SRI. ROHIT KUMAR BANSAL CHIEF OPERATIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4676 OF2020BETWEEN:1. SRI. KUNAL BAHL CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF M/S JASPER INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED, 238 1ST FLOOR, OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110020 2. SRI. ROHIT KUMAR BANSAL CHIEF OPERATIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF