Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … accordance with and in compliance with the applicable laws. Complaint and Allegations:4. 16. The Respondent Inspector appointed under Section 21 of the Act (as per G.O No.HFW/ 20/ IMM/ 2010 dated 20/ 04/ 2010), has filed the Complaint

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … accordance with and in compliance with the applicable laws. Complaint and Allegations:4. 16. The Respondent Inspector appointed under Section 21 of the Act (as per G.O No.HFW/ 20/ IMM/ 2010 dated 20/ 04/ 2010), has filed the Complaint

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … affirmed this position. The said contents and of website www.jeevraksha.org have been set out at Annexure B page 21 and what one finds is that they indicate, prima facie, as to how there were disputes between Parulekars

Dominic Thomas vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

First Class Magistrate charging the petitioner under Section 65, 43 read with Section 66 of the Information Technology(Amendment) Act, 2008. True copies of Mahazar and seizure list prepared by the Circle Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime, Thiruvananthapuram are … The aforementioned email was duly respondedas evident from Ext.P3 onwards. Later on fifth respondent filed a complaint, dated 21.09.2010 Ext.P4, before the Commissioner of Police alleging that his storage disks and datas were stolen from his office

S.Bharath Kumar Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

in Crime No. 9 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 IPC and 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 has filed this quash petition.2. The de facto complainant/the Senior AdministrativeOfficer of 2nd respondent Institution lodged a complaint … Mr. Gopakumar, ICMR-NIRT, No.1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in connection with Crime No. 9 of 2025 on the

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. A Kalaimani

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

465, 468, 471, 417, 4 201, 120B of IPC and Section 66 read with 43 (1) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. A Writ Petition was filed before the Madurai Bench of 7. the Madras High Court challenging the Notification … stage, a complaint was made to the Prime Minister’s Office on 17.11.2017 as well as the Board on 21.11.2017 alleging large scale malpractices in the written examination and requesting a probe into the complaints of tampering with

Anil Kumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 68 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 as per the order dated 26.08.2022 in S.C. No.361/2019 on the files of the trial court. The order … has not been properly framed. The order framing charge does not comply with the mandatory requirement under Sections 211, 212 and 213 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. (Sections 234, 235 and 236 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

Shaji Poulose Vs. The Institute Of Chartered Accountants Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

proforma for furnishing of information by auditors. 3.3 It is pertinent to highlight that by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, Section 142(2A) was inserted to the IT Act, 1961 conferring special power of audit by a Chartered … tax audits although factors such as the increased permeation of access to technology and consequential increased professional competence of auditors, dynamic and increasing economy, growth … the T.C. (Civil) No.29 of 2021 Etc. 30 appellant on 8th August, 2008 for regulating the business of its members. However, subsequently one of them … respondent- Institute by clauses (c) and (d) of Sub-section (2) of Section 29A, read with Sub-section (4) of Section 21 and Sub-sections (2) and (4) of Section 21B of the 1949 Act, the Central Government T.C. (Civil) No.29

Commissioner of Income Tax Kolkata Xii Vs. M/S Calcutta Export Company

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

perused the factual matrix of the case. Point(s) for consideration:-5) Whether the amendment made by the Finance Act, 2010 in Section 40(a)(ia) of the IT … 40(a)(ia) of IT Act.18) With a view to mitigate this hardship, Section 40(a)(ia) was amended by the Finance Act, 2008 and the provision so amended read as under:-“40. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Sections 30 to 38, … remaining eleven months of the previous year. It was provided that in case of assessees falling under the first category, no disallowance under Section 40(a) (ia) of the IT Act shall be made if the tax deducted … of Section 40(a)(ia) or to be applicable from the date of enforcement. 2126) TDS results in collection of tax and the deductor discharges dual responsibility