Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology amendment act 2008 section 20 · Page 1 of about 830 results (0.059 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 26 2018

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2018

Subject : Right to Information

off and implementation of the Aadhaar scheme.7) On March 03, 2006, approval was given by the Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India for the project titled ‘Unique Identification for BPL Families’ … are created equal, and among their inalienable rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Second Amendment to the US Constitution refers inter alia to security of person, while the Fifth Amendment prohibits inter alia … have challenged the Aadhaar project which took off by way of administrative action in the year 2009. Even after Aadhaar got a shield of statutory … Aadhaar and the architecture built thereupon has received scathing criticism from a section of the society. According to them, Aadhaar is a serious invasion into … PETITION (CIVIL) No.37 OF2015Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 1 of 567

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2022

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2021

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7H

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 07 2021

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7H

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2013

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2013

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2011

itc Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-05-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : The U.P. Urban Planning And Development Act 1973 - Sections 41, 12, 7, 14, 30, 6, 19, 9, 18; Transfer of Property Act 1882 - Section 4; Contract Act - Sections 20, 21

decision, NOIDA published the Hotel Site Allotment Scheme on 17.10.2006, by advertisements in newspapers and by issue of information brochures containing detailed terms and conditions, inviting applications for allotment of plots for 5 star, 4 star and … very same plots were to be earmarked for institutional use (for research/software/information technology services) the allotment rate would be only Rs.5000 per sq.m and if … hotel plots, hardly a year later in March 2008, as against a reserved rate (premium) of Rs.77000/- … sections of that Act relating to contracts, shall be taken as part of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 20 of Contract Act provides that where both the parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to … done, the State Government could have asked the NOIDA to make the amendments for giving effect to the policy decision dated 22nd May, 2006. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2026

Smriti Achuthan vs the State Represented by

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-03-2026

to have committed offences punishable under Sections 408 and 420 of the IPC and Section 66A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. .. A-5 Smriti Achuthan, joined Pace Automation, an executive assistant to the Chairman and CEO, on 01.06.2009. She … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI and Crl.M.P.Nos.596 and 598 of 20241. Smriti Achuthan Wife of Mr.P.J.Thomas, 493, Jalvayu Towers, NGEF Layout, Indira Nagar Post, Bangalore - 560 038. Petitioner(s)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2025

A.a Abdulla vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-28-2025

Subject : Education

offences involved are punishable under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. The prosecution allegation in short is as follows:The petitioner received a telephone call on 20.07.2024 from an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2024

Shaji Poulose Vs. The Institute Of Chartered Accountants Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-17-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

proforma for furnishing of information by auditors. 3.3 It is pertinent to highlight that by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, Section 142(2A) was inserted to the IT Act, 1961 conferring special power of audit by a Chartered … should increase the ceiling limit of tax audits although factors such as the increased permeation of access to technology and consequential increased professional competence of auditors, dynamic and increasing economy, growth of new and specialized areas of … the T.C. (Civil) No.29 of 2021 Etc. 30 appellant on 8th August, 2008 for regulating the business of its members. However, subsequently one of them … 2024 INSC451REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Oscar Laboratories (P) Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-26-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(P& H)546

Tribunal should be communicated to this centre every fortnight so that this information is available to all other charges, and there is uniformity in the … under Order 43, Rule1 of C.P.C., - Held, After introduction of Section 110A in the C.P.C., by 2002 Amendment Act, no Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable against judgment/order/decree passed by a Single Judge of a High Court. A … were granted statutory status with the insertion of Section 268A into the IT Act, 1961, by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1999. The second contention advanced by the learned Counsel for the respondent-assessee … raised by the respondent-assessee, the Tribunal vide its order dt. 25th Sept., 2000 recalled the ex parte order passed by it on 18th Nov., 1999.4.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial