Advanced Search Results

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

off and implementation of the Aadhaar scheme.7) On March 03, 2006, approval was given by the Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India for the project titled ‘Unique Identification for BPL Families’ … are created equal, and among their inalienable rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Second Amendment to the US Constitution refers inter alia to security of person, while the Fifth Amendment prohibits inter alia … have challenged the Aadhaar project which took off by way of administrative action in the year 2009. Even after Aadhaar got a shield of statutory … Aadhaar and the architecture built thereupon has received scathing criticism from a section of the society. According to them, Aadhaar is a serious invasion into … PETITION (CIVIL) No.37 OF2015Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 1 of 567

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

service providers had exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … 29.07.2025 RPronounced on : 24.09.2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.7405 OF 2025 (GM - RES) BETWEEN: X CORP.

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7H

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7H

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.2358 OF 2025

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This

Sasidharan M.G. vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

It is submitted that in exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (1) of section 70B of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. 2008, effective from 27 10.2009, appointed the Respondent No.5 Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (hereinafter CERT In) to serve … HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 25TH JYAISHTA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 10819 OF 2021 PETITIONER: SASIDHARAN M.G. AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.LATE GOPALAN, MATHRU

Sri Binoj P J vs State by Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

laws prevailing in various other countries.149. It was in the aforesaid backdrop that thelegislature by virtue of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 inter-alia amended Section 67 of the IT Act and introduced Section 67A along with Section 67B. This was … -1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17142 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI BINOJ P J

Shivaram S/O Prakash Kali vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015 against accused Nos.1 and 2 based on the first information dated 09.04.2025 received from the father of the victim girl. During the course of investigation, accused No.1 was … IN GADAG TOWN POLICE STATION CRIME NO: -2-238 OF BNS-2023, UNDER SECTIONS 66(e), 67(a) IT ACT, 2000 AND (AMENDMENT ACT)-2008, UNDER SECTION 6 OF POCSO ACT-2012 AND UNDER SECTION 3(1)(w)(2)(va) OF SC/ST (POA)-1989 (AMENDMENT) ACT-2015 PENDING ON THE … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100528 OF