Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology amendment act 2008 section 18 · Page 1 of about 1,206 results (0.128 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 23 2024

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2024

Subject : Right to Information

children over the internet.145. The aforesaid was due to the fact that, the IT Act prior to the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (for short, the ‘2008 Amendment Act’), criminalized only one act being the publication or transmission of obscene material, … to the issue involved in the case at hand. Therein this Court whilst upholding the constitutional validity of Section 18 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 which inter-alia provided for a statutory presumption of contravening the provisions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2026

Sri Binoj P J vs State by Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-12-2026

laws prevailing in various other countries.149. It was in the aforesaid backdrop that thelegislature by virtue of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 inter-alia amended Section 67 of the IT Act and introduced Section 67A along with Section 67B. This was … in one particular sub-section, whether the same is made out in the other two sub-sections or not. - 18 -II. Concept of ‘Possession’, ‘Constructive Possession’ and ‘Immediate Control’ under Section 15 of the POCSO. …. …. ….111.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2021

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … proceedings in C.C.No.156/2020 initiated against the petitioners in both the matters and certain others for alleged violation of Section 18(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 punishable under Section 27(b)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 07 2021

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … proceedings in C.C.No.156/2020 initiated against the petitioners in both the matters and certain others for alleged violation of Section 18(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 punishable under Section 27(b)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2008

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-03-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2025

Sri Yashaswi I vs State by Women Police Station

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-10-2025

of offence punishable under sections 85, 82(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS 2023, section 66(E) of the Information Technology Act, 2008 and sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015.4. … preferred this appeal.5. Respondent No.2 appeared through her counsel andfiled statement of objections contending that in view of section 18 of SC & ST (POA) Act, 1989, the application filed under Section 482 of BNSS 2023 is not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2025

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-24-2025

service providers had exemption, a safe harbour from liability for third party content. In 2009, the Parliament enacts Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘IT Amendment Act, 2008’ for short), which added Section 69A to the original enactment of 2000, and substituted … across borders, planting the seeds of international trade. This long march of progress culminated in postal reforms of 1874 and 1875 whereupon the General Postal Union, subsequently renamed as the Universal Postal Union, was born, erecting for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2025

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-29-2025

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … avoid getting cheated Published: Tue 16 Aug 2022, 5:26 PM Updated: Thu 18 Aug 2022, 11:06 AM By Ashwani Kumar”“Using fake Twitter handle @embassy_help, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2013

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2013

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … punishable under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and therefore, the First Information Report be quashed to this extent. 18 Lastly, it was urged that the statement not of the person allegedly defamed is recorded, but that of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 2022

Sasidharan M.G. vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-15-2022

It is submitted that in exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (1) of section 70B of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. 2008, effective from 27 10.2009, appointed the Respondent No.5 Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (hereinafter CERT In) to serve … been stated as under in The Law of Extraordinary Legal Remedies by F.G. Ferris and F.G. Ferris, Jr.:“Note 187.- Mandamus, at common law, is a highly prerogative writ, usually issuing out of the highest court of general

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial