Advanced Search Results

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … Diary No(s). 21237/2019; C.A. No._____/2022 @ SLP (C) No._____/2022 @ Diary No(s). 17255/2020; C.A. No._____/2022 @ SLP(C) No.1404/2021; C.A. No._____/2022 @ SLP (C) No._____/2022 @

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … 2020 1 7 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 4.17. The allegations made in the Complaint are as follows:4. 17.1. It is alleged that in October 2014, M/s Adept Biocare, a proprietary concern of one Mr. Amandeep Chawla,

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … 2020 1 7 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 4.17. The allegations made in the Complaint are as follows:4. 17.1. It is alleged that in October 2014, M/s Adept Biocare, a proprietary concern of one Mr. Amandeep Chawla,

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

legal canvass. The canvass spreads to vast and varied enactments - Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (‘Act’ for short); Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … Arvind Kamath would, though not refute the submissions, 2021 SCC OnLine Del 1788 puts across legal frame work, taking this Court through the provisions of

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … is emerging from contents of the website. In these circumstances, the First Information Report deserves to be quashed. 17 In support of this Writ Petition, Mr.Mor, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, submits that the complaint does

Sasidharan M.G. vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

It is submitted that in exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (1) of section 70B of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. 2008, effective from 27 10.2009, appointed the Respondent No.5 Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (hereinafter CERT In) to serve … Recently, the CentralGovernment has also notified Cable Television Networks (Amendment) Rules, 2021 vide Notification No GSR 416(E) dated 17.06.2021 thereby establishing a statutory mechanism for redressal of grievances/complaints of citizens relating to violation of Programme and Advertising

Sri Binoj P J vs State by Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

laws prevailing in various other countries.149. It was in the aforesaid backdrop that thelegislature by virtue of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 inter-alia amended Section 67 of the IT Act and introduced Section 67A along with Section 67B. This was … BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17142 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI BINOJ P J S/O. SRI.JOSE.P.V AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT PUDUSSERY HOUSE, CHOTTUPARA KILLANNUR,

G.Surendhar Vs The State Rep by its, The Deputy Superintendent of Poli ...

Court : Chennai

and remanded to judicial custody on04.03.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 66E, 67 & 67A of the Information Technology Act 2008 and Section 4 of the Tamil nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women (Amendment) Act, 2002 subsequently … Appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (POA) Amendment Act 2015 seeking to set-aside the orderdated 17.04.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.551/2026 passed by the Learned Principal District and Sessions Division of Ranipet District and grant bail to

Dr. Madhukar G Angur vs the State

Court : Karnataka

for offences punishable under Sections 465 and 468 of the IPC and Sections 66 and 66D of the information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short).2. Heard Sri Kiran S.Javali, learned senior counsel appearingfor … 413 transactions. Hence, the charge against the accused under the Sections: 66, 66(D). of IT Act 2000 (Amended Act 2008) and Sec: 465, 468 IPC.” (Emphasis added)A perusal at the complaint and the summary of charge sheet is … defined in theCode. The dictionary definition of “fraud” is ‘deliberate deception, treachery or cheating intended to gain advantage’. Section 17 of the Contract Act, 1872 defines “fraud” with reference to a party to a contract.27. The term “fraudulently”