Advanced Search Results

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

children over the internet.145. The aforesaid was due to the fact that, the IT Act prior to the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (for short, the ‘2008 Amendment Act’), criminalized only one act being the publication or transmission of obscene material, … 4 B. IMPUGNED ORDER .............................................................................. 10 C. SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES ...................................................... 16 i. Submissions on behalf of the Appellants. .................................................... 16 ii. Submissions on … Scheme of the POCSO. ................................................ 25 b. Relevant Provisions of the IT Act. ..................................................................... 38 ii. Scope of Section 15 of the POCSO and Section 67B of the IT Act. ............ 40 a. Contradictory Views of different

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … income of the person receiving them:]. (i) Subject to the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 16, any income derived from property held under trust or other legal obligation wholly for religious or charitable purposes,

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … on its Website conduct themselves in accordance with and in compliance with the applicable laws. Complaint and Allegations:4. 16. The Respondent Inspector appointed under Section 21 of the Act (as per G.O No.HFW/ 20/ IMM/ 2010 dated

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … on its Website conduct themselves in accordance with and in compliance with the applicable laws. Complaint and Allegations:4. 16. The Respondent Inspector appointed under Section 21 of the Act (as per G.O No.HFW/ 20/ IMM/ 2010 dated

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … Information Technology Act, 2000, the Petitioner has been framed under pressure or influence of politically well connected persons. 16 It is then stated that the website does not disclose any menacing or offensive material. It is contended

Mrs. Kavitha Mahesh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commissi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2011(2)KCCR1662

to the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the further amendment to this Act by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.Consequential amendments brought about in the Indian Evidence Act by Act 21 of 2000 and Act 10/2009 are … (This Election Petition is filed under Section 81 of the representation of people act, 1951, praying to declare the election of the 5th respondent to … CD Nos.2, 5, 6 and 14; that the memo was ordered on 16.11.2010 permitting the marking of the 4 CDs on behalf of the petitioner

S.Bharath Kumar Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

in Crime No. 9 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 IPC and 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 has filed this quash petition.2. The de facto complainant/the Senior AdministrativeOfficer of 2nd respondent Institution lodged a complaint … Mr. Gopakumar, ICMR-NIRT, No.1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in connection with Crime No. 9 of 2025 on the … were identified by Mr.V. Arumugam, SSI, CCPS, East Zone.7. The affidavits dated 16.03.2026 have been filed by therespective parties stating that the 2nd respondent has

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. A Kalaimani

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

465, 468, 471, 417, 4 201, 120B of IPC and Section 66 read with 43 (1) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. A Writ Petition was filed before the Madurai Bench of 7. the Madras High Court challenging the Notification … the year 2017-2018. 1058 vacancies were notified and 1,70,366 applications were received. A written examination was conducted on 16.09.2017 in which 1,33,567 candidates appeared. The written examination was of objective type. A2 printed book was given to

Mahadev Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Right to Information

to Section 275 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Act 5 of 2009 (Code of Criminal Procedure amendment) Act, 2008, which runs as follows:"Provided that evidence of a witness under this Sub-Section may also be recorded by Audio-Video

A.NITHIN KUMAR Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

2023, 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002, 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendement) Act, 2008. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the … The Inspector Police, CCD-1, Cyber Crime Police station, Chennai-South.2. R.Varshini ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in Crime No.08 of 2025, … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 16.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA A.Nithin Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State