Advanced Search Results

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … provided thereunder, by relying on the decision of the Apex Court in Vijay Dhanka vs. Najima Momtaj, (2014) 14 SCC638 more Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 4 4 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 particularly Para 12 thereof which

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … provided thereunder, by relying on the decision of the Apex Court in Vijay Dhanka vs. Najima Momtaj, (2014) 14 SCC638 more Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 4 4 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 particularly Para 12 thereof which

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … closed. 12 It is alleged that the Petitioner has been fighting for the rights of animals since last 14 years and also a friend of Claude Lila Parulekar, who is currently under house arrest and under illegal

Mrs. Kavitha Mahesh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commissi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2011(2)KCCR1662

to the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the further amendment to this Act by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.Consequential amendments brought about in the Indian Evidence Act by Act 21 of 2000 and Act 10/2009 are … and identified as MPEGAV-2, MPEGAV-5, MPEGAV-6 and MPEGAV-14, from out of the 14 CDs said to be comprising the videograph of the event, which has … (This Election Petition is filed under Section 81 of the representation of people act, 1951, praying to declare the election of the 5th respondent to

Luhar Shaileshbhai Vaghaji vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

complainant.3. The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Section 420 of IPC and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.4. The 3rd respondent entered appearance through counsel. An affidavit sworn in by him is also produced.5. I … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 24TH JYAISHTA, 1945 CRIME NO.14/2021 OF CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE PETITIONER/ACCUSED: LUHAR

Mahadev Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Right to Information

to Section 275 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Act 5 of 2009 (Code of Criminal Procedure amendment) Act, 2008, which runs as follows:"Provided that evidence of a witness under this Sub-Section may also be recorded by Audio-Video … document to the person, the Court may permit the document to be shown in the following manner: - 14 - NC:2023. KHC-K:6386 CRL.P No.200953 of 2023 9.1 If the document is at the Court Point, by transmitting

Joseph Thomas @ Sunny vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Sections 66 D and 67 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. The prosecution case is that, during the month of March 2020, the petitioner/first accused got acquainted with … Regular bail.2. The petitioner is the first accused in Crime No. was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Sections 66 D and 67

Anandu B vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

354, 354 A & 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 and 67 a of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. The allegation against the petitioner is that aftercollecting some naked photographs of the defacto complainant taken at … case. It is submitted that the petitioner is presently in Qatar and he is arriving in India on 14-09-2023. Reference is made in this regard to Anneuxre-A4 Airline ticket of the petitioner.5. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor,

Madhusudan Murmu and ors. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and or ...

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar State Electricity Board Electrical Engineer (General) Cadre Rules - section 2(x); Electricity Supply Act - Section79 (C), 2(2) (10), 5(3), 4 (3), 8; Bihar State Electricity Board (Conduct of Business) Regulations - Section 16 (v); Constitution of India - Article 14.

either on the post of Code A-1, Code A-4 or Code A-2 and the petitioners having degree in Information Technology (I.T.) applied for the post of Code A-3. All the petitioners on coming out successful in the written … Tribes. So far as minimum percentage of marks is concerned, that was brought under the rule through an amendment w.e.f. 14.10.1998. However, stipulation made under the advertisement issued on 20.9.2008 was subsequently diluted by the subsequent corrigendums … have been disclosed in the counter affidavit. 5. Being aggrieved with the action of the respondents-Board, all the petitioners have moved this Court, wherein prayer … of the Board, submitted that by virtue of the power conferred under Section 79 (C) of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948, Bihar State Electricity Board