Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … Summation of interpretation of Section 2(15) ............................................................................................... 85 C. Sections 10, 11, 12, 12A, 12AA and 13 of the IT Act ................................................................................ 86 Distinction between

Manish Kumar. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act - Sections 53, 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376, 354, 306, 509, 511 Read With Section 120B; Information and Technology (Amendment) Act - Sections 66A, 66B, 67A, 67B, 72

120B of the Indian Penal Code as also under Sections 66A/66B/67A/67B and 72 of the the Information and Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. Learned Counsel Mr. Nilesh Kumar submitted that no specific allegation was attributed against the petitioner Manish Kumar … petitioner and I further find that the case of the petitioner does not come within the proviso of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice ( Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 so as to deny the statutory

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

off and implementation of the Aadhaar scheme.7) On March 03, 2006, approval was given by the Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India for the project titled ‘Unique Identification for BPL Families’ … are created equal, and among their inalienable rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Second Amendment to the US Constitution refers inter alia to security of person, while the Fifth Amendment prohibits inter alia … No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 12 of 567 PDS records, state-wise, was sought to … have challenged the Aadhaar project which took off by way of administrative action in the year 2009. Even after Aadhaar got a shield of statutory … Aadhaar and the architecture built thereupon has received scathing criticism from a section of the society. According to them, Aadhaar is a serious invasion into

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … Momtaj, (2014) 14 SCC638 more Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 4 4 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 particularly Para 12 thereof which are reproduced hereunder for easy reference:12. The words “and shall, in a case where the accused

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … Momtaj, (2014) 14 SCC638 more Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 4 4 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 particularly Para 12 thereof which are reproduced hereunder for easy reference:12. The words “and shall, in a case where the accused

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … Animal Welfare Laws in the State of Maharashtra. He also runs a helpline for animals that rescues around 1200 animals a year. 8 It is alleged that the Information Technology Act, 2000 was deliberately used purely to

Mrs. Kavitha Mahesh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commissi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2011(2)KCCR1662

to the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the further amendment to this Act by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.Consequential amendments brought about in the Indian Evidence Act by Act 21 of 2000 and Act 10/2009 are … (This Election Petition is filed under Section 81 of the representation of people act, 1951, praying to declare the election of the 5th respondent to … No.MPEGAV-2 as CD No.MPEGAV-3 has been corrected subsequently by the order dated 12.1.2011, passed on Misc.Cvl.21452/2010 and therefore, submits that the marking of documents confining

Dominic Thomas vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

First Class Magistrate charging the petitioner under Section 65, 43 read with Section 66 of the Information Technology(Amendment) Act, 2008. True copies of Mahazar and seizure list prepared by the Circle Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime, Thiruvananthapuram are … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 22ND JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 6759 OF 2012 PETITIONER: DOMINIC THOMAS AGED 41

Smriti Achuthan vs the State Represented by

Court : Chennai

to have committed offences punishable under Sections 408 and 420 of the IPC and Section 66A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. .. A-5 Smriti Achuthan, joined Pace Automation, an executive assistant to the Chairman and CEO, on 01.06.2009. She … punishable under Sections 408, 420, of IPC r/w. Section 66 of Information Technology Act, 2000, read with Section 120B of IPC, a case has been registered in Crime No.172 of 2011 dated 30.03.2011, pursuant to a complaint

S.Bharath Kumar Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

in Crime No. 9 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 IPC and 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 has filed this quash petition.2. The de facto complainant/the Senior AdministrativeOfficer of 2nd respondent Institution lodged a complaint … Mr. Gopakumar, ICMR-NIRT, No.1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in connection with Crime No. 9 of 2025 on the